MFA Comments to the U.K. Hedge Fund Working Group’s Consultation Paper

December 14, 2007

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIMA Alternative Investment Management Association, AML, audited annual accounts, board of directors, board of trustees, Borrowed Stock, bright line test, Chartered Financial Analyst Institute, cherry picking, client confidentiality, collateral agreements, collateral calls/two way collateral posting, commercial terms, compliance, compliance procedures, Comply or Explain, conflicts of interest, consultation paper, counterparties, counterparty risk, cross-market particpant working group, Derivative posistions, Difficult-to-Value Assets, Disclosure, disclosure thresholds, exchange traded posistions, exposure, Fair Value, Federal Reserve Bank of New York for OTC equity derivatives, fire sale, fund governing bodies, Fund Governing Body, funds of funds, global alternative investment industry, Global Investment Performance Standards, global relevance, Governance of Operational Risk, Hedge Fund Working Group, hedge funds, HFWG, illiquid securities, independent in-house functions, independent third parties, independent valuation services providers, inside information, Insider Dealing, Investment Policy, investor groups, investors, Irish Stock Exchange, jurisdictional requirements, Key man risk, Key Performance indicators (KPis) Fund Governance Disclosure, legal risks, Lenders/Prime Brokers/Dealers, Luxembourg Stock Exchange, managed futures funds, managers, Market Abuse, market price, market risk, marketable securities, Model Risk, net asset value, netting agreements, non-marketable, non-U.S. exchanges, offshore, one-stop shop, OTC derivatives transactions, OTC electronic transaction posistions, OTC market particpants, Outsourcing Risk, performance fee, Performance Measurement Disclosure, portfolio, portfolio management, potential conflicts, potential liability, President's Working Group on Private Pools of Capital (PWG), price sources, prime brokers, proxy voting policy, reconciliation errors, Regulators, regulatory implicationsm Websites, regulatory risks, Risk Disclosure, scenario analyses, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), segregation, service legal agreement, side letters, side pocket, soft limits, Sound Practices for Hedge Fund Managers, spectrum, stock lender, stress testing, third parties, Third Party Administrators, trade association, U.S. based funds, U.S. securities law, UK, uncertainity, United Kingdom, valuation, valuation determinations,
From: MFA, John G. Gaine

To:

Thomas Deinet, Hedge Fund Working Group

Today, MFA submitted the following response letter to the U.K. Hedge Fund Working Group on its Consultation Paper. The overall theme of our response letter is that sound practices should be global in nature and recommendations that are not capable of being implemented globally (due to differences in business models, jurisdictional requirements or for other reasons) should not be part of a global sound practices document, but should instead be considered for inclusion in a more narrowly tailored subset of recommendations for particular segments of the global hedge fund industry.

Downloads