MFA Comment Letters

Topic: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Draft Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.13.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Advanced Method Advisers Act, AIF, AIFMD, Article 3(2), Article 61, Article 9(3), AUM, AUM Calculations, bespoke system, Box 1, Box 106, Box 13, Box 19, Box 2, Box 29, Box 78, Box 79, Box 81, Box 86, Box 88, Box 89, Box 93, Box 95, Box 99, CDS, CESR Guidelines, collateral, collateral directive, Commitment Method, Committee on European Securities Regulators, confidentiality, consultation paper, counterparties, counterparty exposures, credit default swap, depositaries, depositary, diligence requirement, Dodd-Frank, due diligence, ECB, EU investors, EU Passport, European Central Bank, European Commission, exposure, Financial Services Authority, foreign exchange hedging position, Form PF, FSA, G-20, gates, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Gross Method, interest rate hedging position, international coordination, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Level 2, Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, leverage, liability regime, liability standards, liquidity risk, mark-to-market, market risk, marketing, MiFID, NAV, net asset value, omnibus accounts, operational risk, OTC transaction, passport regime, portfolio management, portfolio risk, prime brokers, private funds, professional indemnity insurance requirements, professional investors, proprietary information, re-hypothecation provisions, redemption policy, registration, remuneration, reporting period, repurchase agreement, retail investors, risk limits, risk management, safe-keeping function, SEC, securities lending agreement, segregation, semi-annual reporting, side pockets, sub-custodian, sub-investment managers, systemic risk, the directive, third party managers, transparency, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, UCITS Directive, underwriters, unobservable, valuation agents, Value at Risk, VaR,

Comment Letter Responding to FSB’s Background Note, ‘Shadow Banking: Scoping the Issues’05.16.11


MFA submitted a comment letter in response to the FSBs Background Note on Shadow Banking. In our letter, we discussed […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ABCP conduits asset concentration, asset management structures, Background Note, bank holding companies, bank/broker counterparts, banks, borrowing arrangements, broker dealers, collateral, concentration of assets, counterparty risk management, Counterparty Risk Management Policy Group, credit intermediation chain, derivatives contracts, direct regulation of entities, Distribution/Wholesale Funding, Financial Stability Board, FSA, haircuts, hedge fund adviser, hedge fund borrowings, hedge fund industry, hedge fund leverage, highly leveraged financial institutions, individual adviser, initial margin, insurance companies, interconnectedness of hedge funds, investors, large corporate investors, legal separation of different funds, liquidity transformation, Long Term Capital Management, long-only mutual funds, low leverage, LTCM, macro-prudential approach, manage liquidity risk, margining process, mark-to market margining, maturity transformation, mutual funds, non-bank institutional investors, nonbank financial institutions, off-balance sheet vehicles, Pension Funds, private equity funds, regulation, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory arbitrage concerns, repo collateral, repo liabilities, repo sellers, secured basis, secured borrowings, shadow banking system, Shadow Banking: Scoping the Issues, short term liability, stable capital, systemic impact of hedge funds, systemic risk concerns, The UK Financial Services Authority, U.S. President's Working Group on Financial Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
Results 1 - 3 of 3