MFA Comment Letters

Topic: schedule B

Comment Letter to the SEC and CFTC on Definitions of “Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer (together, SDs), Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant (together MSPs) and Eligible Contract Participant (ECP)02.22.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC and CFTC on their joint proposed rule to further define swap dealer, […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: abnormal price movement acknowledgment requirements, applicable MSP thresholds, asset mix, bank capital standards, capital markets, cash settled swaptions, CDS, CDS protection, central clearing, centrally cleared positions, CFTC, Chicago mercantile exchange, clearing member defaults, clearinghouse, CME, commercial hedging, commercial loans, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, counterparty domicile, counterparty exposure, credit default swaps, credit ratings, credit spreads, creditworthiness, currency based institutions, current uncollateralized outward exposure test, daily mark requirements, daily variation margin calls, daily volatility, Dealer, dealers, default risk, delta weighting, deregistration period, discount factor, ECP, eligible contract participant, end-users, feeder fund, financial counterparty, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., Financial Stability Oversight Council, FINRA, fixed downside risk, Form PF, Form PQR, FSOC, fund domicile, future exposure discount, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, high yield credit swaps, high-grade corporate securities, highly leveraged, highly liquid assets, independent amount of collateral, independent variable, index CDS, index derivatives, index reference entity, inflation, initial margin, interest rate swap, investment grade, investment-grade credit swaps, ISDA master agreements, jump-to-default risk, know your counterparty requirements, large private fund, liabilities to equity, LIBOR, limited purpose designations, liquidity, liquidity rights, longer-term leverage, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, Major Swap Participant, manager domicile, margin methodologies, mark-to-market exposure, market activity, market growth, market location, market-standard discount rate, master-feeder fund, minimum duration of status, mitigating commercial risk, msp, MSP definitions, MSP determination, MSP test, MSP thresholds, multiplier, non-ECP, non-investment grade, non-U.S. market, non-U.S. regulators., non-US domiciled fund, non-US entities, non-US securities, offshore fund, option expiration date, options on a swap, over-collateralization, overnight borrowing, physically settled swaptions, portfolio risk, potential future exposure calculation, potential future exposure test, potential systemic risk impact, Proposed Form PF section 1b, proposed form PF section 2(a), proposed form PF section 3, proposed form PF section 4, proposed Form PQR, quarters, question 11, question 27, question 38, question 47, question 5, question 68, reevaluation period, reference entity domicile, reproducible test, retail cash, Retail Forex Pool, risk factor multiplier, risk factor multipliers, risk mutualization, risk-mitigating tools, schedule B, SD, SD obligations, SEC, secured debt, Securities Exchange Commission, Security-Based Swap Dealer, security-based swaps, Senator Hagan, Senator Lincoln, short-term financing, short-term leverage, single-name CDS, smaller private fund, spread bank designation, substantial counterparty exposure, substantial position, swap rate, swap underlier, Swaps dealer, swaptions, systemic risk, systemically important, systemically important financial institution, term borrowings, threshold levels, tools of credit protection, trade verification, trading entity, traditional commodity pool, U.S. banking system, uncollateralized exposure, underlying instrument, undiversified market participant, United States financial markets, unpaid premiums, unsecured debt, upward adjustment, US entities, US Treasuries, valuation of collateral, variation margin, volatility,

MFA Letter to IRS Regarding Compliance Issues for Private Investment Funds Filing a Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report05.13.09


MFA submitted a letter as a follow up to its meeting on April 7 with officials from the IRS to […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: adverse guidance AML program rule, banks, Betty Santangelo, board directors, bonds, brokerate accounts, Carl E. Kennedy, checking, commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors, compliance, control the disposition, cost-efficient, covered financial accounts, demand, deposit, derivatives, Detroit Computing Center of the Internal Revenue Service, domestic feeder fund, domestic limited liability companies, domestic limited partnerships, Don Carbaugh, Don Moorehead, equity interest, FBAR, FBAR Requirements, federal register, federal tax return, filing exception, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, FinCEN, flow through, Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Reports, foreign currencies, foreign securities, Form 1040, Form 1065, Form 1120, Form 5500, Form 990, Form 990-PF, Form TD 90-22.1, Form TD F 90-22, Form TDF 90-22.1, Fund Managers, general definitions, Glen Kirkland, group filings, hedge funds, illiquid, Internal Revenue Service, interpretive guidance, IRS, IRS Reports Clearance Officer, John G. Gaine, legislators, limited liability companies, lock-up periods, master-feeder structures, mutual fund, Nancy Rose, notes, Office of Chief Counsel, OMB No. 1545-2038, Partnerships, Patton Boggs LLP, pooled interest, President's Working Group on Financial Markets, prior submissions, private equity, private investment funds, publicly-traded corporations, PWG, Question 7a, Question 9, Questioon 6a, regulations, savings, schedule B, Schedule N, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Side-by-Side Structure, signature authority, SRZ, stock certificates, tax forms, tax-exempt organization, taxpayer identification number, U.S. tax-exempt investors, United States Department of the Treasury, William Langford,
Results 1 - 2 of 2