MFA Comment Letters

Topic: retail investors

MFA Submits Comments in Response to SEC Proposed Amendments to Regulation D, Form D and Rule 15609.23.13


MFA submitted a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to proposed amendments to Regulation D, Form D […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: accredited investor accredited investors, Advance Form D, adviser registration, anti-fraud rules, assets under management, AUM, Ban on General Solicitation and Advertising, beneficial owners, capital formation, capital markets, cease and desist, censure, CFTC, Colorado Bar Association, commodities, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, competition, compliance, compliance costs, cost-benefit analysis, deemed compliant, derivatives, disclosure requirements, Division of Investment Management, due diligence, efficiency, eligible purchasers, Elizabeth Murphy, equity, examination process, Federal Securities Laws, Form 13F, Form ADV, Form D, Form PF, Franklin Group of Funds, Fund Sponsors, general partner, General Solicitation, general solicitation materials, Global Investment Performance Standards, harmonization, hedge fund industry, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, high net worth requirements, institutional investor, interpretive guidance, investment company, Investor Protection, investor qualification standards, issuers, JOBS Act, John Thune, knowledgeable employees, legends, liquidity, market practices, marketing materials, mutual fund, natural persons, Norm Champ, OCIE, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, performance, pitch book, PLI Hedge Fund Management Conference, pool participants, private capital markets, private fund, private fund managers, private fund offerings, private placement memorandum, private placements, proprietary information, public markets, qualified clients, qualified purchasers, Ray Garrett, registered investment adviser, registered investment companies, Regulation D, retail investors, RICs, Rulemaking, Schedule 13D, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, sophisticated investors, state securities regulators, statement of policy, transparency, United States Congress, Variable Life, Verification Methods,

MFA Submits Comments on Hong Kong Consultation on Electronic Trading09.23.12


On September 23, MFA submitted comments to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission on its consultation paper on the […]

MFA Response to FSA Discussion Paper on Implementation of the AIFMD03.23.12


Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Advanced Method AIFMD, AIFMD firm, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, audit function, CAD-defined terms, capital requirements, CDS, CESR Guidelines on Risk Management and the Calculation of Global Exposure and Coutnerparty Risk for UCITS, chief compliance officer, compliance function, conflicts of interest, CRD3 framework, depositary, depositary liability, Dodd-Frank Act, ESMA, EU Passport, EUR denominated bonds, European Central Bank, European Securities and Markets Authority, exchanges, external valuer, family investment vehicle, family relationship, FCA, FCA Approach Document, Final Advice on the AIFMD, Financial Services Authority, foreign exchange, Form PF, FSA, FSA Discussion Paper "Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive", FSA Principles for Business, FSA Remuneration Code, functional and hierarchal independence, functional and hierarchical separation, hedge funds, hedging arragements, institutional investors, interest alignment, interest rate risk, internally managed AIF, internationally coordinated approach to reporting, investor capital, IPRU (INV), less than fully invested, letter-box entity, leverage, limited partnership, liquidity requirements, marketing, Member State competent authorities, MiFID, MiFID firm, MiFID investment services, MiFID portfolio managers, NAV, NAV per share, net asset value, net assets under management, non-EU AIFM, PII requirements, portfolio management, portfolio management personnel, portfolio risk, preferential treatment, prime brokers, private placement, professional indemnity insurance, professional investors, professional negligence, proportionality principle, proprietary business information, public offers, QIS disclosure requirements, qualitative risk limit, redemption terms, regulatory requirements, regulatory risks, remuneration guidelines, remuneration provisions, retail consumers, retail customers, retail investors, reverse solicitation process, risk management, risk/return profile, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, segregated account, side letters, single AIFM, swap data warehouses, SYSC 10 of the FSA Handbook, third country, third country managers, tier 4 firm, UCITS Directive, UCITS investors, UK AIFM, unregulated CIS, valuation oversight duties, valuation procedures, Value at Risk, VaR methodology,

Comment Letter to SEC and CFTC Regarding Definition of ‘Eligible Contract Participant’01.10.12


MFA and SIFMA submitted a letter and attachment to the CFTC and the SEC on their proposed definition of “eligible […]

Results 1 - 10 of 24