MFA Comment Letters

Topic: Regulators

MFA Comment Letter to Prudential Regulators on Final Margin Requirements11.25.14


On November 24, MFA submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Prudential Regulators (Fed, FDIC, OCC, FCA and FHFA) to […]

MFA Submits Comment Letter in Response to Basel-IOSCO’s Consultative Document on Margin Requirements for Non-Cleared Derivatives09.28.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Working Group on Margining Requirements (WGMR) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: asset classes Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, best practices, bilateral exchange, bilateral exchange of variation margin, buy-side firms, CCP, CDS, CDS spreads, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, cleared derivatives, clearing, clearing house, commodities, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, concentration limits, correlated financial instruments, cost mitigation, credit, credit default swap, credit risk, cross-product master netting agreements, currency, custodian accounts, delta, Denominated in G7 Currencies, derivatives, derivatives markets, diversification, Dodd-Frank Act, eligible collateral, equities, EU, Eurodollar futures, European Union, financial instruments, foreign exchange, forwards, G7, haircuts, harmonization, hedge, hedge funds, hedged portfolios, implementation timeline, initial margin, interest rates, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, IOSCO, ISDA, liquidation, liquidity, liquidity characteristics, liquidity costs, liquidity mechanism, major swap participants, mandatory clearing, margin, margin requirements, margin threshold, margining, market advantage, market infrastructures, market liquidity, market participants, market practices, market value, minimum transfer amount, MTA, mutually offsetting transactions, netting, non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions, non-cleared derivatives, non-cleared interest rate swaps, non-compliance, notional value, novating parties, novation, novation arrangements, over-collateralization, party stepping in, party stepping out, phase-in period, portfolio margining, Portfolios, prudential regulators, prudentially regulated financial counterparties, quantitative impact study, re-hypothecation, Regulators, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory authorities, remaining party, replacement transaction, repurchase agreements, risk characteristics, risk management, risk offsets, risk profile, risk/reward profile, segregated account, segregation, SIFI, standard practice, swap dealers, swaps, systemic importance, systemic risk, systemic risk level, systemically important, systemically important non-financial firm, third-party segregation, transparency, two-way margining, U.S. Treasury futures, uniformity, United States, unlevel playing field, unsecured credit extension, variation margin, Working Group on Margining Requirements,

MFA Submits Comments on AIFMD Remuneration09.27.12


MFA submitted comments to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on its consultation on guidelines on sound remuneration policies […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: affiliated group AIFM, AIFMD, alignment of interests, alternative instruments, Annual Report, assets under management, audit, AUM, Balance Sheet, bank, bonuses, capital requirements, carried interest, chief compliance officer, Claw-Back, commissions, compliance, compliance staff, Confidential Information, consultation paper, control function, control functions, Council of the European Union, counsel, credit institutions, deferral of remuneration and pension, deferred remuneration, delegate, deposit-taking entity, Disclosure, distributions, ESMA, EU, EU Passport, European Commission, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Union, excessive risk-taking, fee structure, fees, financial institutions, financial stability, governing body, government insurance, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, Identified Staff, institutional investor, Insurance, investors, junior partner, Limited Liability Company, limited liability partnership, LLC, LLP, management bodies, management committees, marketing, material risk, Member State, Member State competent authorities, MiFID, MiFID firms, minimum capital requirements, non-deferred remuneration, non-EU AIFM, non-executive directors, operational risk, other risk taker, own account dealer, owner-managed AIFM, parent company, pension, performance fee, performance measures, Policy Makers, private placement, private placement regime, proportionality principle, public shareholders, redemption rights, Regulators, RemCo, remuneration, remuneration policies, retention policy, risk alignment, risk management, risk profile, Senior Management, service providers, shareholders, sophisticated investors, stakeholders, tax, Tax Implications, third country, UCITS, underperformance, United Kingdom, variable remuneration,

MFA Submits Letter to ESMA on Draft Technical Standards on OTC Derivatives08.05.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) in response to its Consultation Paper on “Draft Technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: "delta" hedge administrator, affiliated market participants, agency basis, Asia, back testing, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III, bespoke non-cleared trades, bilateral counterparty credit risk, bilateral non-cleared OTC derivatives transactions, capital, CCP, CCP governing bodies, CDS, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, clearing member, client protections, close-out, collateral, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, compliance, confidence interval, conflicts of interest, contractual relationship, Council of the European Union, counterparty risk, coupon, CPSS-IOSCO, CPSS-IOSCO standards, credit default swap, credit institutions, credit risk, Cross-Border, currency, Dealer, debt-security based swaps, default, default fund, Derivative Contracts, derivatives, derivatives contracts, direct client, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, duplicative regulation, EMIR, ESMA, EU, EU Member State, Euro, Europe, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Union, execution, extraterritorial application of EMIR, extraterritoriality, fiduciary duty, financial instrument, floating rate payment, foreign exchange, gross basis, hedging, in-the-money swap, index, indirect clearing, indirect client, initial margin, interest rate derivatives, interest rate swaps, interlocking governance arrangements, internal controls, International Organization of Securities Commissions, interpretive guidance, IOSCO, LCH Clearnet, Lee Underwood, liquidation horizons, liquidity fragmentation, major swap participants, margin, margin requirements, margin valuation, market participants, maturity, money market instruments, mutual recognition, negative correlation, net basis, netting, non-cleared OTC derivatives, non-linear products, omnibus account, OTC derivatives, OTC derivatives market, OTC derivatives transactions, over-collateralization, over-the-counter derivatives, portability, portfolio compression, portfolio reconciliation, posted collateral, principal basis, Proprietary Trading Strategy, proprietary trading tools, public disclosure, Regulators, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory technical standards, risk committee, risk management, risk management framework, risk mitigation, risk profile, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, security-based swaps, segregation, self-regulatory organization, settlement prices, SRO, Stan Ivanov, straight-through processing, stress testing, swap dealers, swaps, systemic risk, third country regime, total return swaps, trade repositories, trading costs, trading venues, transaction fees, transparency, upfront payment, variation margin,
Results 1 - 10 of 21