MFA Comment Letters

Topic: OTC transaction

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Draft Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.13.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Advanced Method Advisers Act, AIF, AIFMD, Article 3(2), Article 61, Article 9(3), AUM, AUM Calculations, bespoke system, Box 1, Box 106, Box 13, Box 19, Box 2, Box 29, Box 78, Box 79, Box 81, Box 86, Box 88, Box 89, Box 93, Box 95, Box 99, CDS, CESR Guidelines, collateral, collateral directive, Commitment Method, Committee on European Securities Regulators, confidentiality, consultation paper, counterparties, counterparty exposures, credit default swap, depositaries, depositary, diligence requirement, Dodd-Frank, due diligence, ECB, EU investors, EU Passport, European Central Bank, European Commission, exposure, Financial Services Authority, foreign exchange hedging position, Form PF, FSA, G-20, gates, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Gross Method, interest rate hedging position, international coordination, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Level 2, Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, leverage, liability regime, liability standards, liquidity risk, mark-to-market, market risk, marketing, MiFID, NAV, net asset value, omnibus accounts, operational risk, OTC transaction, passport regime, portfolio management, portfolio risk, prime brokers, private funds, professional indemnity insurance requirements, professional investors, proprietary information, re-hypothecation provisions, redemption policy, registration, remuneration, reporting period, repurchase agreement, retail investors, risk limits, risk management, safe-keeping function, SEC, securities lending agreement, segregation, semi-annual reporting, side pockets, sub-custodian, sub-investment managers, systemic risk, the directive, third party managers, transparency, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, UCITS Directive, underwriters, unobservable, valuation agents, Value at Risk, VaR,

MFA Comments on Consultation on Increasing Short Position Transparency10.09.09


MFA submitted a letter to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) today in response to its Consultation Paper […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: alternative investment classes anonymised disclosure, bid-ask spreads, capital formation, capital raising, cash markets, CESR, chilling effect, close out indicators, confidentiality, convertible arbitrage, convertible bonds, copycat behavior, delta adjusted, derivatives, designated securities, dual-listed securities, efficiency, endowments, exchange trading, Financial Services Authority, financial services sector, financial stocks, foundations, FSA, global equity markets, hedging strategies, herding, Hong Kong, Hong Kong market, institutional investors, investment managers, Journal of Finance, liquidity, listed corporations, manipulative conduct, market efficiency, market liquidity, market making, market participants, market volatility, net long position, net short positions, non-designated securities, non-public disclosure, off-exchange transaction, on-market transactions, OTC transaction, pan-European short selling disclosure regime, pensions, price discovery, price formation, price volatility, primary market, private reporting, proprietary research, public disclosure of short positions, reporting threshold, retail investors, risk management, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Futures Commission, SEHK, settlement, SFC, short positions, short sellers, short selling, short selling bans, short selling disclosure regime, short squeeze, stocks, transaction costs, transitory short position, transparency, turnover ratio, volatility,
Results 1 - 2 of 2