MFA Comment Letters

Topic: operational challenges

MFA and AIMA Submit Joint Letter to ESMA in Response to Call for Evidence on Short Selling Regulation03.15.13


MFA and AIMA jointly submitted a comment letter to ESMA responding to its Call for Evidence regarding its evaluation of […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIFMD AIMA, Alternative Investment Management Association, assets under management, AUM, BaFin, Belgium, bid-ask spreads, bond, Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, capital, CDS, CESR, Commissione Nazionale per le Societa e la Borsa, Committee of European Securities Regulators, competent authorities, compliance, corporate issuer, Council of the European Union, credit default swap, delta, depositary receipts, derivative instrument, derivatives, duration, efficiency, EMIR, equity, ESMA, EU Member State, Europe, European Commission, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, eurozone, extraterritoriality, Finland, France, futures, futures market, Germany, harmonization, hedge funds, hedging, index, index derivatives, interpretive guidance, issued share capital, Italy, Latvia, Lehman Brothers, liquidity, locate, London Stock Exchange, mark-to-market, market disruption, market distortions, market participants, MiFID, net short position, Netherlands, non-EU investment firms, operational challenges, price discovery, price efficiency, price formation, prime broker, PRNewswire, public disclosure, reasonable expectation, reporting obligation, reporting requirements, reverse engineer, risk, securities, settlement, share capital, short positions, short selling, short selling bans, short selling regulation, short squeeze, single-name CDS, sovereign bonds, sovereign debt, sovereign issuer, Spain, Steven Maijoor, stock, Stock Exchange Daily Official List, T+1 reporting, T+2, technical standards, third party managers, trading volume, uncovered sovereign CDS, United Kingdom, volatility,

MFA Comments to SEC on Pay to Play Proposal10.06.09


MFA submitted a letter to the SEC today in response to its proposal to, among other things, restrict political contributions […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: academic institutions affiliated broker-dealer, agency, American Bar Association, anti-competitive effects, assets, authority, backward-looking provisions, beneficial owners, Broker, broker-dealer, California Public Employees' Retirement System, CalPERS, CalSTRS, cash solicitation, charitable institution, chief compliance officer, chilling effect, code of ethics rule, Committee on Federal Regulation of the American Bar Association, compensation arrangements, compliance burden, compliance costs, compliance procedures, Connecticut, contractual rights and obligations, covered associates, covered investment pool, de minimi exception, Dealer, direct investment, direct investors, Disclosure, disproportionately severe punishment, due diligence, executive officer, family members of covered associates, fiduciary duty, Form ADV, Foundation, fund assets, fund of funds, general partner, government assets, government entities, government official, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, Illinois, inadvertent contribution, Inadvertent Violation, inauguration or transition committee, incentive fee structure, institutional investor, instrumentality of the State, interest, investment adviser, investment advisory services, investment management industry, investment management services, investment objectives, investment services, investment techniques, legal authorities, limited partnership, liquidity, local or state political party, look-back period, look-back provision, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System, Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement System, management fees, marketing activities, Massachusetts, MSRB, municipal securities, municipal securities business, municipal securities principals, municipal securities professional, municipal securities representative, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, municipal securities underwriters, municipal underwritings, New Mexico Educational Retirement Board, New Mexico Investment Council, New York, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New York State Common Retirement Fund, offshore managers, Oklahoma, operational challenges, pay to play practices, pay to play scandals, Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Pennsylvania State Employment Retirement System, pension, personal political activities, placement agent, plan, platform arrangement, political action committee, political contributions, pool of assets, pooled investment vehicle, portfolio manager, pre-approval policies, pre-approval procedures, principal business unit, private fund, program, public pension plans, publicly offered securities, redemption requests, redemption rights, registered investment adviser, registered investment companies, registration, regulations, Regulators, requests for proposals, returned contribution, risk management, sales principals, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, securities firms, soliciting, state and federal laws, state and local entities, Teacher Retirement System of Texas, third party placement agent, third party placement agents, third party solicitors, transparency, unregistered adviser, Wall St. Journal, Washington, written compliance policies and procedures,
Results 1 - 2 of 2