MFA Comment Letters

Topic: market practices

MFA Submits Comments in Response to SEC Proposed Amendments to Regulation D, Form D and Rule 15609.23.13


MFA submitted a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to proposed amendments to Regulation D, Form D […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: accredited investor accredited investors, Advance Form D, adviser registration, anti-fraud rules, assets under management, AUM, Ban on General Solicitation and Advertising, beneficial owners, capital formation, capital markets, cease and desist, censure, CFTC, Colorado Bar Association, commodities, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, competition, compliance, compliance costs, cost-benefit analysis, deemed compliant, derivatives, disclosure requirements, Division of Investment Management, due diligence, efficiency, eligible purchasers, Elizabeth Murphy, equity, examination process, Federal Securities Laws, Form 13F, Form ADV, Form D, Form PF, Franklin Group of Funds, Fund Sponsors, general partner, General Solicitation, general solicitation materials, Global Investment Performance Standards, harmonization, hedge fund industry, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, high net worth requirements, institutional investor, interpretive guidance, investment company, Investor Protection, investor qualification standards, issuers, JOBS Act, John Thune, knowledgeable employees, legends, liquidity, market practices, marketing materials, mutual fund, natural persons, Norm Champ, OCIE, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, performance, pitch book, PLI Hedge Fund Management Conference, pool participants, private capital markets, private fund, private fund managers, private fund offerings, private placement memorandum, private placements, proprietary information, public markets, qualified clients, qualified purchasers, Ray Garrett, registered investment adviser, registered investment companies, Regulation D, retail investors, RICs, Rulemaking, Schedule 13D, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, sophisticated investors, state securities regulators, statement of policy, transparency, United States Congress, Variable Life, Verification Methods,

MFA Submits Comment Letter in Response to Basel-IOSCO’s Consultative Document on Margin Requirements for Non-Cleared Derivatives09.28.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Working Group on Margining Requirements (WGMR) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: asset classes Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, best practices, bilateral exchange, bilateral exchange of variation margin, buy-side firms, CCP, CDS, CDS spreads, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, cleared derivatives, clearing, clearing house, commodities, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, concentration limits, correlated financial instruments, cost mitigation, credit, credit default swap, credit risk, cross-product master netting agreements, currency, custodian accounts, delta, Denominated in G7 Currencies, derivatives, derivatives markets, diversification, Dodd-Frank Act, eligible collateral, equities, EU, Eurodollar futures, European Union, financial instruments, foreign exchange, forwards, G7, haircuts, harmonization, hedge, hedge funds, hedged portfolios, implementation timeline, initial margin, interest rates, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, IOSCO, ISDA, liquidation, liquidity, liquidity characteristics, liquidity costs, liquidity mechanism, major swap participants, mandatory clearing, margin, margin requirements, margin threshold, margining, market advantage, market infrastructures, market liquidity, market participants, market practices, market value, minimum transfer amount, MTA, mutually offsetting transactions, netting, non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions, non-cleared derivatives, non-cleared interest rate swaps, non-compliance, notional value, novating parties, novation, novation arrangements, over-collateralization, party stepping in, party stepping out, phase-in period, portfolio margining, Portfolios, prudential regulators, prudentially regulated financial counterparties, quantitative impact study, re-hypothecation, Regulators, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory authorities, remaining party, replacement transaction, repurchase agreements, risk characteristics, risk management, risk offsets, risk profile, risk/reward profile, segregated account, segregation, SIFI, standard practice, swap dealers, swaps, systemic importance, systemic risk, systemic risk level, systemically important, systemically important non-financial firm, third-party segregation, transparency, two-way margining, U.S. Treasury futures, uniformity, United States, unlevel playing field, unsecured credit extension, variation margin, Working Group on Margining Requirements,
Results 1 - 3 of 3