MFA Comment Letters

Topic: margin requirements

MFA Coalition Submits Joint Letter to SEC and CFTC on CDS Customer Portfolio Margining05.10.13


MFA, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) (collectively, the “Associations”) submitted a […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ACLI AIMA, Alternative Investment Management Association, American Council of Life Insurers, arbitrage, backloading, broad-based indices, broker-dealer, buy-side participants, capital, capital formation, CDS, central clearing, CFTC, clearing, clearing agency, clearing mandate, clearinghouse, collateral, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, counterparty credit risk, counterparty risk, credit default swaps, credit risk, custody bank, DCM, DCO, dealers, derivatives, derivatives clearing organization, direct clearing members, directional portfolio, economic barriers, end-users, equity markets, excess margin, FCM, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA, futures commission merchants, Gary Gensler, hedging, ICE Clear Credit LLC, ICE Trust, initial margin, initial margin requirements, insolvency, institutional custodian, interconnectedness, interest rate swaps, Investor Protection, iTraxx Europe, legal segregation with operation commingling, liquidation, liquidity, liquidity requirements, long-short strategies, LSOC, LSOC with excess, margin, margin requirements, margining, market efficiency, market participants, Mary Jo White, master netting agreements, narrow-based index credit default swap, net margin, New York State Banking Department, OCC, offsetting position, Options Clearing Corporation, portfolio margining, price competition, price distortion, proprietary strategies, registered clearing agencies, regulatory framework, risk management, S&P 500, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, security-based swaps, segregation, self-clearing members, sell-side firms, settlement, short straddles, single-name CDS, speculative position, straight-through processing, swaps, systemic risk, tri-party segregation arrangements, variation margin, volatility, voluntary clearing,

MFA Submits Comments on Basel-IOSCO Second Consultative Document on Margin Requirements for Uncleared Derivatives03.15.13


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Working Group on Margining Requirements (WGMR) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision […]

MFA Submits Letter to SEC on Proposed Capital, Margin, and Segregation Rules02.22.13


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on its proposed rules on “Capital, Margin, and […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: "too big to fail \, 111th Congress, accounting, AIG, American International Group, asset class, asymmetrical initial margin exchange, asymmetry, bankruptcy, bankruptcy estate, Bart Chilton, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Ben Bernanke, best practices, bilateral exchange of variation margin, Broker, broker-dealer, buy-side firms, capital, capital charge, capital formation, capital inefficiency, capital requirements, Cash Flow, CCP, CDS, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., Chicago Trading Company, collateral, collateral management, collateral management stystems, commodity broker, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, complexity, compliance, compliance date, Council of the European Union, counterparties, counterparty risk, credit default swap, credit risk, creditworthiness, cross-margining, cross-product master netting agreements, customer collateral, customer protection, customer replicability, customized risk management tools, Darrell Duffie, DCO, Dealer, dealers, default, default segregation model, derivatives, derivatives clearing organization, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, Dodd-Frank Act, efficiency, eligible collateral, endowments, enhanced protections, Eric Chern, European Commission, European Parliament, federal register, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 424, Federal Reserve Board, fellow customer risk, financial contagion, financial crisis, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, financial institutions, financial instrument, financial system, FINRA, forwards, Fraud, haircuts, hedge funds, House Committee on Financial Services, ICE Clear Europe Limited, ICI, independent third party custodian, Individual Segregation, initial margin, insolvency, international harmonization of regulations, International Organization of Securities Commissions, international regulatory standards, Investment Company Institute, investment risk, Investor Protection, IOSCO, ISDA, ISDA Margin Survey 2012, LCH.Clearnet Ltd., legal segregation with operation commingling, Lehman Brothers, leverage, liquidation, liquidation time horizon, liquidity, LSOC, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, Major Swap Participant, mandatory clearing, margin, margin requirements, margining, market participants, market practice, market risk, MF Global Inc., money market instruments, multiplier, netting, New York Portfolio Clearing LLC, non-commercial end-users, Notice of Exclusive Control, omnibus segregation, operational and legal commingling, operational costs, operational risk, Options Clearing Corporation, OTC derivatives, out-of-the-money, pension, Peregrine Financial Group, portability, portfolio compression, portfolio margining, portfolio reconciliation, Private Funds Managers, pro-cyclical effects, product type, proprietary information, prudential regulators, reconciliation, reform, registered clearing agencies, regulation, regulatory arbitrage, repurchase agreements, risk, risk management, Robert Wasserman, Russell Wasendorf, SEC, securities, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Transactions, security-based swaps, segregation, segregation model, sell-side firms, settlement, settlement risk, SIFMA, state and federal laws, state bank regulator, swap dealer, swap dealers, Swap Trading Relationship Documentation, systemic risk, tentative net capital, third-party custody arrangement, too interconnected to fail, trade repositories, trading costs, transparency, tri-party custodial arrangements, two-way margining, U.S. dollar, university endowment, Value at Risk, VaR, variation margin, White Paper, Working Group on Margining Requirements,

MFA Submits Comment Letter in Response to Basel-IOSCO’s Consultative Document on Margin Requirements for Non-Cleared Derivatives09.28.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Working Group on Margining Requirements (WGMR) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: asset classes Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, best practices, bilateral exchange, bilateral exchange of variation margin, buy-side firms, CCP, CDS, CDS spreads, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, cleared derivatives, clearing, clearing house, commodities, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, concentration limits, correlated financial instruments, cost mitigation, credit, credit default swap, credit risk, cross-product master netting agreements, currency, custodian accounts, delta, Denominated in G7 Currencies, derivatives, derivatives markets, diversification, Dodd-Frank Act, eligible collateral, equities, EU, Eurodollar futures, European Union, financial instruments, foreign exchange, forwards, G7, haircuts, harmonization, hedge, hedge funds, hedged portfolios, implementation timeline, initial margin, interest rates, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, IOSCO, ISDA, liquidation, liquidity, liquidity characteristics, liquidity costs, liquidity mechanism, major swap participants, mandatory clearing, margin, margin requirements, margin threshold, margining, market advantage, market infrastructures, market liquidity, market participants, market practices, market value, minimum transfer amount, MTA, mutually offsetting transactions, netting, non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions, non-cleared derivatives, non-cleared interest rate swaps, non-compliance, notional value, novating parties, novation, novation arrangements, over-collateralization, party stepping in, party stepping out, phase-in period, portfolio margining, Portfolios, prudential regulators, prudentially regulated financial counterparties, quantitative impact study, re-hypothecation, Regulators, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory authorities, remaining party, replacement transaction, repurchase agreements, risk characteristics, risk management, risk offsets, risk profile, risk/reward profile, segregated account, segregation, SIFI, standard practice, swap dealers, swaps, systemic importance, systemic risk, systemic risk level, systemically important, systemically important non-financial firm, third-party segregation, transparency, two-way margining, U.S. Treasury futures, uniformity, United States, unlevel playing field, unsecured credit extension, variation margin, Working Group on Margining Requirements,

MFA Submits Letter to ESMA on Draft Technical Standards on OTC Derivatives08.05.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) in response to its Consultation Paper on “Draft Technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: "delta" hedge administrator, affiliated market participants, agency basis, Asia, back testing, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III, bespoke non-cleared trades, bilateral counterparty credit risk, bilateral non-cleared OTC derivatives transactions, capital, CCP, CCP governing bodies, CDS, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, clearing member, client protections, close-out, collateral, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, compliance, confidence interval, conflicts of interest, contractual relationship, Council of the European Union, counterparty risk, coupon, CPSS-IOSCO, CPSS-IOSCO standards, credit default swap, credit institutions, credit risk, Cross-Border, currency, Dealer, debt-security based swaps, default, default fund, Derivative Contracts, derivatives, derivatives contracts, direct client, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, duplicative regulation, EMIR, ESMA, EU, EU Member State, Euro, Europe, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Union, execution, extraterritorial application of EMIR, extraterritoriality, fiduciary duty, financial instrument, floating rate payment, foreign exchange, gross basis, hedging, in-the-money swap, index, indirect clearing, indirect client, initial margin, interest rate derivatives, interest rate swaps, interlocking governance arrangements, internal controls, International Organization of Securities Commissions, interpretive guidance, IOSCO, LCH Clearnet, Lee Underwood, liquidation horizons, liquidity fragmentation, major swap participants, margin, margin requirements, margin valuation, market participants, maturity, money market instruments, mutual recognition, negative correlation, net basis, netting, non-cleared OTC derivatives, non-linear products, omnibus account, OTC derivatives, OTC derivatives market, OTC derivatives transactions, over-collateralization, over-the-counter derivatives, portability, portfolio compression, portfolio reconciliation, posted collateral, principal basis, Proprietary Trading Strategy, proprietary trading tools, public disclosure, Regulators, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory technical standards, risk committee, risk management, risk management framework, risk mitigation, risk profile, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, security-based swaps, segregation, self-regulatory organization, settlement prices, SRO, Stan Ivanov, straight-through processing, stress testing, swap dealers, swaps, systemic risk, third country regime, total return swaps, trade repositories, trading costs, trading venues, transaction fees, transparency, upfront payment, variation margin,

MFA Submits Comments to the Monetary Authority of Singapore on Proposed Regulations on OTC Derivatives03.26.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in response to its Consultation Paper on Proposed […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: aggregate counterparty credit risk average notional value, backloading, barriers to entry, bilateral market, buy-side clearing, CCP, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, clearing, clearing arrangements, clearing facilities, clearing house, clearing threshold, client access to clearing, commercial banks, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, confidentiality, Consultation Paper on Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, counterparty identification, counterparty risk, customized and proprietary investment strategies, dealers, derivatives transactions, Dodd-Frank Act, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, duplicative regulation, efficient capital flows, ESMA, EU, European Commission, European Union, financial entities, Financial Stability Board, foreign regulator, Form PF, fragmentation of liquidity, FSB, G20, G20 commitments, Gary Gensler, Honk Kong Monetary Authority, intellectual property, international harmonization of regulations, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, legal entity identifiers, liquid and standardized transactions, liquidation horizons, mandary clearing, margin determinations, margin methodologies, margin requirements, market participants, Mary Schapiro, MAS, Monetary Authority of Singapore, money changers, netting, non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions, non-dealer client representation, non-financial entities, OTC derivatives, OTC derivatives market, over-the-counter derivatives, real-time processing, recognized clearing houses, registered insurers, regulatory regime, risk committees, risk management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Futures Commission, settlement risk, Singapore, straight-through processing, swaps, systemic risk, trade repositories, trading costs, trading mandate, transaction data, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture Nutrition and Forestry,

MFA Submits Comments to ESMA in Response to Draft Technical Standards on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories03.19.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in response to its Discussion Paper on […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ADR aggregation, alternative liquidity providers, American Depository Receipt, back testing, back-to-back arrangements, bespoke and customized transactions, Cayman Islands, CCP, CCP Board, CCP committee, CCP data, CCP governance arragements, CCP's margin models, CCPs governance structure, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, chief compliance officer, chief risk officer, chief technology officer, clearing, clearing member, clearing members, clearing obligation, client clearing models, clients, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, competitive execution, confidence interval, confidentiality agreements, confidentiality of counterparty identities, conflicts of interest, counterparty and operational risk, counterparty credit risk, credit intermediary, credit intermediation, default, derivatives market, disclosure requirements, disclosure thresholds, Dodd-Frank Act, electronic trading, electronically processed, EMIR, ESMA, ESMA Discussion Paper on Draft Technical Stanards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives CCPs and Trade Repositories, EU, EU member currency, Euro, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Union, executing counterparty, execution documentation, execution platform, extraterritorial application of EMIR, FCM, FIA, FIA-ISDA Cleared Derivatives Execution Agreement, foreign exchange derivatives, fund domicile, futures commission merchant, Futures Industry Association, guarantor, Hong Kong, indirect clearing, indirect clearing models, indirect contractual arrangements, interest rate derivatives, international harmonization of regulations, International Swap Derivatives Association, ISDA, liquidation period, lookback period, manager domicile, margin levels, margin requirements, market integrity, market location, market oversight, non-dealer representatives, non-default clearing members, notional amount, OTC derivatives, OTC derivatives market, over-the-counter derivatives, portability, principal of business, privacy and confidentiality of information, public dissemination of information, real-time processing, reasonably liquid traded instruments, record keeping, reference entity domicile, reference security, risk committees, risk management expertise, SD, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, security-based swaps, segregation, settlement currency, sound governance requirements, straight-through processing, stress tesing, sublimit, swap dealer, systemic risk, technical standards, third country counterparities, third country entities, trade acknowledgment, transaction volumes, underlying instrument,
Results 1 - 10 of 22