MFA submitted a comment letter to the Committee of European Banking Supervisors in response to its consultation paper on remuneration […]
MFA filed a comment letterwith the UKs Financial Services Authority, in response to the FSAs consultation paperon revising its remuneration […]
MFA submitted a letter to the SEC today in response to its proposal to, among other things, restrict political contributions […]
MFA submits comments in response to IOSCO’s “Call for Views on Issues that Could Be Addressed by IOSCO on Funds […]
Comment Letter on Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements05.31.11
MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC in response to the joint agency proposed rules that would prohibit incentive-based […]
Topics: Incentive-Based Compensation Agreements Joint Agencies, systemic risks, covered financial institutions, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury (OCC), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of Thrift Supervision, Treasury (OTS), National Credit Union Administration, (NCUA), Federal Housing Finance Agency, financial stability, upside performance, hedge fund advisers, adviser employees, risk management, compensation arrangements, align the interests, portfolio management activities, alignment of interest, management fees, performance fees, high water marks, risk-adjusted returns, Financial Stability Oversight Council, systemically different, leverage, liquidity risk, maturity mismatch, regulatory scrutiny, asset management structures, investment managers, borrowing arrangements, derivatives contracts, redemption rights, equity base, redemption-forced liquidations, debt capital, prime brokers, lending parties, liquidations, tax, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, pooled investment vehicles, consolidated balance sheet, accounting principles, net assets, gross assets, deferred compensation, incentive compensation arrangements, inflation,