MFA Comment Letters

Topic: ESA

MFA and AIMA Submit Joint Response on EMIR Risk Mitigation Techniques for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives07.10.15


MFA and AIMA submitted a joint response to the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) on their “Second Consultation Paper on Draft […]

MFA Submits Comments to European Supervisory Authorities in Response to Joint Discussion Paper on Risk Mitigation Techniques04.02.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Supervisory Authorities in response to their Discussion Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: assurance undertakings asymmetry, bankruptcy-remote, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel II, Basel III, Basel rules, best practices, bilateral arrangements, bilateral exchange, bilateral initial margin arrangements, buy-side firms, capital, CDS, central clearing, CFTC, collateralization, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, competitive advantages, counterparty credit risk, covered swap entities, credit default swap, credit exposure, credit institutions, creditworthiness, current market practice, daily valuation of collateral, de minimi exception, deep and liquid markets, derivatives markets, discriminatory distortions, dispute resolution procedures, due diligence, eligible collateral, EMIR, ESA, ESMA, EU, Eurodollar futures, European Banking Authority, European Commission, European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Supervisory Authorities, European Union, exposures, haircuts, hedging, highly correlated assets, incremental compliance costs, independent third party custodian, initial margin, insolvency estate, institutions for occupational retirement provision, insurance undertakings, interest rate swap, internal model method, internal models, international harmonization of regulations, intraday change, investment firms, Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities, legally required transparency, liquidity, major swap participants, margin, margin calculations, mark-to-market, market transparency, net margin, netting, NFCs+, non financial counterparties above the clearing threshold, non-cleared derivative contracts, non-cleared derivatives, non-cleared OTC derivatives, non-financial assets, non-prudentially regulated financial counterparties, NPRFC, OTC derivatives, over-collateralization, over-the-counter derivatives, party-specific variables, perceived systemic relevance, physically-settling forwards, posting party, PRFC, prudential regulators, prudentially regulated financial counterparties, receiving party, regulatory arbitrage, reinsurance undertakings, repurchase agreements, revaluation, risk mitigation techniques, risk-based margin requirements, security lending agreements, segregated account, segregation, segregation of counterparty assets, segregation regime, standardized method, substantial counterparty exposure, substantial position in swaps, systemic importance, tri-party custodial arrangements, uncollateralized, uniformity of application, variation margin,

MFA Responds to ECON’s MiFID Questionnaire01.13.12


MFA submitted responses to MEP Markus Ferbers Questionnaire on MiFID/MiFAR 2, which asks for further information on certain aspects of […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: abnormal trading conditions algorithmic trading, alternative arrangements, alternative investment funds, alternative investment managers, APA, approved publication arragement, approved reporting mechanism, arbitrage trading, ARM, bilateral credit agreement, bilateral execution documentation, broker crossing network, broker dealers, broker liquidity, CCP, central limit order book, circuit breakers, clearing obligation, CLOB, co-location services, commodity derivatives, confidentiality requirements, confidentiality safeguards, conflicts of interest, consolidated tape provider, corporate governance, corporate governance rules, correlating instruments, counterbalancing benefits, CTP, custody, dark pools, DEA, depositary receipts, derivatives, derivatives trading venues, direct electronic access, ECON, Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, EEA venues, eligible counterparties, EMIR, energy swaps, equivalence, ESA, ETF, European Commission, European Market Infrastructure Regulation, European Parliament, European Supervisory Authorities, exchange traded funds, financial activity, flash crash, hedging transactions, high frequency trading, high frequency/low latency, limit up-limit down measure, liquidity, listed equity derivatives, listed futures, management bodies, market-making activities, Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, Markus Ferber, MiFID passport, MTF SME, mutual funds, non-discriminatory access, non-discriminatory access to market infrastructure, non-structured UCITS, organized trading facility, organized venues, OTF, packaged retail investment product, position limits, position management powers, pre-trade market data, PRIP, professional clients, public consultation, Questionnaire on MiFID/MiFIR 2 by Markus Ferber MEP, real-time clearing, real-time registration, reciprocal access, reciprocal recognition, regulatory capital, regulatory investigation, relevant counterparties, request for quote system, retail clients, RFQ, risk caps, safekeeping, sanction, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, shares, SME, straight-through processing, structured UCITS, third country firms, third country trading venues, trading obligation, trading venues, transparency, UCITS IV, voice brokerage systems,
Results 1 - 3 of 3