MFA Comment Letters

Topic: Disclosure

MFA Submits Letter in Response to SEC Investor Advisory Committee Recommendations on Implementation of the JOBS Act03.22.13


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in response to its proposed implementation of Section […]

MFA Submits Comments on AIFMD Remuneration09.27.12


MFA submitted comments to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on its consultation on guidelines on sound remuneration policies […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: affiliated group AIFM, AIFMD, alignment of interests, alternative instruments, Annual Report, assets under management, audit, AUM, Balance Sheet, bank, bonuses, capital requirements, carried interest, chief compliance officer, Claw-Back, commissions, compliance, compliance staff, Confidential Information, consultation paper, control function, control functions, Council of the European Union, counsel, credit institutions, deferral of remuneration and pension, deferred remuneration, delegate, deposit-taking entity, Disclosure, distributions, ESMA, EU, EU Passport, European Commission, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Union, excessive risk-taking, fee structure, fees, financial institutions, financial stability, governing body, government insurance, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, Identified Staff, institutional investor, Insurance, investors, junior partner, Limited Liability Company, limited liability partnership, LLC, LLP, management bodies, management committees, marketing, material risk, Member State, Member State competent authorities, MiFID, MiFID firms, minimum capital requirements, non-deferred remuneration, non-EU AIFM, non-executive directors, operational risk, other risk taker, own account dealer, owner-managed AIFM, parent company, pension, performance fee, performance measures, Policy Makers, private placement, private placement regime, proportionality principle, public shareholders, redemption rights, Regulators, RemCo, remuneration, remuneration policies, retention policy, risk alignment, risk management, risk profile, Senior Management, service providers, shareholders, sophisticated investors, stakeholders, tax, Tax Implications, third country, UCITS, underperformance, United Kingdom, variable remuneration,

Petition to SEC for Rulemaking on Rule 502 of Regulation D, Ban General Solicitation01.06.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC requesting that the Commission amend Rule 502(c) of Regulation D to eliminate […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: accredited investors Administrative Costs, Anti-Fraud Provisions, Auditors, Ban on General Solicitation, Ban on General Solicitation and Advertising, Broadcast Over Television, Broker, Business Practices, capital formation, Chairman Schapiro, Competitiveness, Congressman Darrell Issa, Consulting Firm, Continuous Offerings, Disclosure, Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Investment Management, Economic Growth, Federal Securities Laws, Fraud, Fund Managers, General Advertising, General Solicitation, hedge funds, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, Inadvertent Violation, Independent Regulatory Agencies, Industry Conferences, Inquiries, Interpretive Framework, investment company, Investor Criteria, Investor Protection, Investor Protections, Issuer, Job Creation, Legal Costs, Limited Partnerships, Offerings or Sales, Offers or Sales Securities, Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets, oversight, Petition for Rulemaking, Policy Makers, Pre-Existing Relationship Doctrine, Pre-Existing Substantive Relationship, prime brokers, private funds, Private Funds Managers, Private Offering, Proprietary Investment Data, Protecting Investors: A Half Century of Investment Company Regulation, Public Offering, Qualified Potential Investors, qualified purchasers, Radio, Regulators, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Selling Agent, Senate, sophisticated investors, Subscription Agreement, Systemic Risk Assessment, Third-Party, transparency, United States Congress, Unsophisticated Investors, Waiting Period, Wealth Tests,

Comment Letter in Response to the FDICs Interim Final Rule Implementing Certain Provisions of the Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA),03.28.11


MFA filed a comment letter in response to the FDICs interim final rule implementing certain provisions of the orderly liquidation […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: allocation of capital Bankruptcy Code, Board of Directors of FDIC, bond holders, bridge financial company, chapter 7 liquidation, claim disallowance, contingent claims, covered financial institution, creditor involvement, creditor losses, creditor participation, critical vendors, debt instrument, default, Disclosure, distress, doctrine of necessity, equality of distribution, estate, fair market value, favored creditors, FDIC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, financial market meltdown, insolvency laws, insolvency proceeding, investor, judicial review, Liquidation Authority provisions, liquidation framework, liquidation process, liquidation value, longer-term financing, market data, market discipline, market expertise, market fluctuations, moral hazard, non-statutory considerations, OLA, orderly liquid authority, preferred creditors, providers of lines of credit, publicly traded securities, quotes, ratable payments, receivership, receivership estate, repurchase agreements, secured creditor, securities contracts, shareholder losses, short-term creditors, short-term financing, short-term lenders, swaps, systemic risk, systemically significant firm, third-party market participants, transparency, true market valuation, underlying collateral, unduly delay, Union Bank v. Wolas, unsecured claim, unsecured creditors, unsecured deficiency claim, US government securities, valuation date, valuation of collateral, valuation rules, volatility,

Comment Letter to the CFTC on Business Conduct Standards for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants with Counterparties02.22.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the CFTC on its proposal on Business Conduct Standards for Swap Dealers and Major […]

Letter to the European Commission in Response to its Consultation Paper, Review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)02.02.11


MFA submitted comments to the European Commission in response to its Consultation Paper, Review of the Markets in Financial Instruments […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: "strict equivalence" regime accurate price discovery, actionable IOIs, affirmative and negative obligations, aggregate open interest/notional amount, AIFM directive, algorithmic trading, alternative investment fund managers, alternative trading systems, APAs, approved publication arrangements, arbitraging, article 4(8) of MiFID, Asian Markets, asset managers, ATSs, automated execution technology, automated trading, banks, block sized trades, Bloomberg L.P., broker dealers, broker-dealer capital, brokers, capital flows, capital formation, cash balance, CCP, CDS market, certificates, CESR, circuit breakers, client identifier, co-location facilities, commodity derivatives, commodity derivatives market, composite quotation system, comprehensive notional data, comprehensive price date, concentrated risk solution, confidentiality obligation, conflicts of interest, Congress, consolidated core data, Consolidated Tape, Consolidated Tape Association, consolidated transaction reporting system, consultation papers, contract, core date, cost-effective manner, cost/benefit analysis, CQ plan, credit default swaps, credit flows, daily trading volume threshold, dark pools, data consolidation, deep market, depositary receipts, depth of market quotations, depth-of-market fees, derivatives position, direct market access, Disclosure, due diligence obligations, electronic market-making, electronic trading platforms, EMIR, equity investors, equity markets, equivalence mechanism, ESMA, EU, European Commission, European Commission on Standardisation and Organised Platform Trading of OTC Derivatives, European Commission Request for Additional Information in relation to the Review of MiFID, European Commission's report of Sovereign CDS, European Consolidated Tape, European Market Infrastructure Regulation, European OTC derivatives markets, European Union, ex-ante disclosure, ex-post disclosure, exchange traded funds, exchange trading, exchange-traded products, financial institutions, financial regulatory system, Financial Stability Board, flash crash, fleeting arbitrage opportunities, G20, global connectivity infrastructure, Google, hard position limits, harmonised position information, hedge funds, hedgers, HFT, HFT trades, high frequency trading, horizon strategies, indications of interest, information requirements, insurance companies, inter-market arbitrage, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, inventory risk, investment strategies, investor confidence, Investor Protection, IOIs, ISDA, latency, lending flows, level playing field, limit down system, limit orders, limit up system, liquid derivatives, liquid market, liquidity, liquidity provision requirements, low latency technology, low latency technology chain, margin requirements, market connectivity intermediaries, market data, market disorder, market efficiency, market impact, market makers, market manipulation, market stability, market turmoil, market-wide single stock circuit breakers, Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, mechanical imposition, member states, MiFID, MiFID framework directive, minimum duration of orders, minimum quantitative threshold, minimum tick sizes, national best bid and offer, National Market System, NetCoalition, NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, nexus, non-equity instruments, non-EU asset managers, non-EU investment firms, non-EU markets, non-hedging, non-HFT trade, non-retail clients, opaque market centers, order flow, order stubs, order-slicing methodologies, Organised Trading Venues, OTC, OTC contract, physical commodity markets, portfolio manager, position management, position-level data, post-trade reporting proposals, post-trade transparency, pre-trade checks, pre-trade transparency, pre-trade transparency waivers, price discovery, price movement, proprietary strategies, quotations, reasonable threshold, reduced transaction costs, regulatory "tax, regulatory authorities, regulatory framework, regulatory transparency thresholds, reporting obligations, reporting protocols, reporting regimes, retail client, risk capital, risk controls, risk exposure, risk management, risk warnings, safeguards, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, securities financing transaction, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, security-based derivatives, sharp shoot, short-term price swings, sovereign CDS, specified maximum execution speeds, speed bumps, stale orders, statutory obligation, strategy holding periods, strict equivalence, sufficiently liquid, summary disclosure, surveillance tools, systemic risk, systemic risk grounds, technological innovation, technology-driven market makers, third country firms, third country regime, third party information vendors, title transfer collateral arrangement, title transfer collateral arrangements, trade repository, trader ID, trading delays, transaction report, transparency directive, UCITS, UCITS Directive, UK Treasury and Financial Services Authority, ultra low-latency technology, unilateral bans, US markets, US Securities Industry Automation Corporation, volatility, waivers, Yahoo Inc,
Results 1 - 10 of 24