MFA Comment Letters

Topic: clearing threshold

MFA Letter to ESAs on EMIR Risk Mitigation Regulatory Technical Standards07.14.14


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) on their joint consultation paper on “Draft regulatory technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIMA alternative investment funds, Alternative Investment Management Association, base currency, Basel Committee for Banking Supervision, Canada, Cayman Islands, clearing threshold, collateral, collateral currency, concentration limits, consultation paper, Council of the European Union, counterparties, counterparty credit risk, dispute resolution procedures, documentation, duplicative regulation, efficiency, EMIR, equivalence, ESMA, European Banking Authority, European Commission, European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority, European Market Infrastructure Regulation, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Supervisory Authorities, financial counterparties, France, G7, Germany, haircuts, harmonization, in-scope entity, Individual Segregation, initial margin, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, IOSCO, ISDA, Italy, Japan, legal opinion, liquidation, liquidity, mandatory margin requirements, margin, market participants, minimum notional threshold, netting, non-financial counterparty, OTC derivatives market, proportionality principle, regulatory arbitrage, regulatory requirements, regulatory technical standards, securities, segregation, settlement currency, settlement period, substituted compliance, systemic risk, third country, third party custodian, trade repositories, trading costs, transparency, uncleared derivative, United Kingdom, United States, US Treasuries, variation margin, verification requirement,

MFA Submits Comments to the Monetary Authority of Singapore on Proposed Regulations on OTC Derivatives03.26.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in response to its Consultation Paper on Proposed […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: aggregate counterparty credit risk average notional value, backloading, barriers to entry, bilateral market, buy-side clearing, CCP, central clearing, central counterparty, CFTC, clearing, clearing arrangements, clearing facilities, clearing house, clearing threshold, client access to clearing, commercial banks, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, confidentiality, Consultation Paper on Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, counterparty identification, counterparty risk, customized and proprietary investment strategies, dealers, derivatives transactions, Dodd-Frank Act, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, duplicative regulation, efficient capital flows, ESMA, EU, European Commission, European Union, financial entities, Financial Stability Board, foreign regulator, Form PF, fragmentation of liquidity, FSB, G20, G20 commitments, Gary Gensler, Honk Kong Monetary Authority, intellectual property, international harmonization of regulations, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, legal entity identifiers, liquid and standardized transactions, liquidation horizons, mandary clearing, margin determinations, margin methodologies, margin requirements, market participants, Mary Schapiro, MAS, Monetary Authority of Singapore, money changers, netting, non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions, non-dealer client representation, non-financial entities, OTC derivatives, OTC derivatives market, over-the-counter derivatives, real-time processing, recognized clearing houses, registered insurers, regulatory regime, risk committees, risk management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Futures Commission, settlement risk, Singapore, straight-through processing, swaps, systemic risk, trade repositories, trading costs, trading mandate, transaction data, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture Nutrition and Forestry,
Results 1 - 4 of 4