MFA Comment Letters

Topic: Chicago mercantile exchange

MFA Submits Accompanying Portfolio Margining Letter11.26.12


MFA submitted a supplemental comment letter to the U.S. prudential regulators during the reopened comment period for their proposed rulemaking […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: affiliate-held collateral bankruptcy, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, broker-dealer, buy-side, capital markets, capital requirements, caps, CCP, CDS, central counterparties, CFTC, Chevron Products Co. v. SemCrude L.P., Chicago mercantile exchange, Cleared Products, CME Clearport, CME Group, collateral, Collecting Futures Commission Merchant, commodity broker, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, covered swap entities, covered swap entity, credit default swap, cross-currency swaps, cross-margining, Dealer, debt obligation, Depositing Futures Commission Merchant, derivatives clearing organization, Dodd-Frank Act, eligible collateral, end-users, Farm Credit Administration, Farm Credit System, FCM, FDIC, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Federal National Mortgage Association, floors, futures, futures commission merchant, hedging, ICE Clear Credit, ICE Clear Europe, In re Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc et al, index CDS, inflation swaps, initial margin, insured obligation, LCH.Clearnet Ltd., liquidity, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, Major Swap Participant, mandatory clearing, margin, market liquidity, market participants, master netting agreements, New York Portfolio Clearing LLC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, options, Options Clearing Corporation, OTC derivatives, over-the-counter derivatives, portfolio margining, posted margin, prudential regulators, redundant margin, regulatory regime, risk, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Security-Based Swap Dealer, security-based swaps, segmentation, swap dealer, swaps, swaptions, systemic risk, triangular setoff, uncleared swaps,

MFA Submits Letter to ESMA on Straight-Through-Processing08.05.12


On August 5, MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to advocate for the […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: aggregate limit Allocations, alternative liquidity providers, anti-competitive effects, anti-competitive restrictions, bid-ask spread, bilateral credit agreement, bilateral derivatives transactions, bilateral market, bilateral master agreements, bilateral risk management, block transactions, breakage, bundled trade, CCP, CCP Requirements Task Force, CDS, central counterparty, central limit order books, CFTC, Chicago mercantile exchange, Christopher Seagon v. Deko Marty Belgium NV, clearing, clearing acceptance process, clearing agreement, clearing member, clearing obligation, clearinghouse, CME, Commission v. Council ERTA, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, competition, competitive liquidity, Continental Cans, cost-benefit analysis, Council of the European Union, counterparty credit risk, Court of Justice of the European Union, credit default swap, credit intermediation, credit limit, credit limit order bookc, credit limits, credit risk, customer clearing documentation, DCM, DCO, dealer-to-customer platforms, dealer-to-dealer clearing, dealers, delegated acts, derivatives, derivatives clearing organization, derivatives markets, derivatives transactions, Designated Contract Market, designation notice, direct clearing members, directive, documentation, Dodd-Frank Act, due diligence, efficiency, electronic trading, EMIR, endowments, energy derivatives, ESMA, ESMA Task Forces, EU, EU Member State, European Commission, European Parliament, European Securities and Markets Authority, European Union, executing counterparty, execution, execution platform, FIA, financial stability, Financial Stability Board, financial system, FSB, futures, Futures Industry Association, futures market, ICE Clear Credit LLC, ICE energy swaps, institutional investors, interconnectedness, interest rate swap, international harmonization of regulations, International Swaps and Dealers Association, investment managers, ISDA, latency, LCH Clearnet, limit check, liquidity, liquidity fragmentation, Liquidity Providers, Major Swap Participant, Managed Funds Association, mandatory clearing, market access, market participants, matched transactions, operational market processes, operational risk, OTC derivatives, OTC Derivatives Task Force, OTC derivatives transactions, over-the-counter derivatives, pension fund, real economy, real-time acceptance, real-time processing, regulatory technical standards, risk, risk management, risk-based, SEF, settlement, straight-through processing, swap dealer, Swap Execution Facility, systemic risk, technical standards, trade repositories, Trade Repositories Task Force, trading desk, trading venues, transaction capture facility, transparency, trilateral clearing agreements, trilateral documentation, underlying clients, United States, voice execution, volatility,

Comment Letter on Proposed Rulemaking for Requirements for Processing, Clearing, and Transfer of Customer Positions04.11.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the CFTC on its proposed rules on Requirements for Processing, Clearing, and Transfer of […]

Comment Letter to the SEC and CFTC on Definitions of “Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer (together, SDs), Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant (together MSPs) and Eligible Contract Participant (ECP)02.22.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC and CFTC on their joint proposed rule to further define swap dealer, […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: abnormal price movement acknowledgment requirements, applicable MSP thresholds, asset mix, bank capital standards, capital markets, cash settled swaptions, CDS, CDS protection, central clearing, centrally cleared positions, CFTC, Chicago mercantile exchange, clearing member defaults, clearinghouse, CME, commercial hedging, commercial loans, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, counterparty domicile, counterparty exposure, credit default swaps, credit ratings, credit spreads, creditworthiness, currency based institutions, current uncollateralized outward exposure test, daily mark requirements, daily variation margin calls, daily volatility, Dealer, dealers, default risk, delta weighting, deregistration period, discount factor, ECP, eligible contract participant, end-users, feeder fund, financial counterparty, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., Financial Stability Oversight Council, FINRA, fixed downside risk, Form PF, Form PQR, FSOC, fund domicile, future exposure discount, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, high yield credit swaps, high-grade corporate securities, highly leveraged, highly liquid assets, independent amount of collateral, independent variable, index CDS, index derivatives, index reference entity, inflation, initial margin, interest rate swap, investment grade, investment-grade credit swaps, ISDA master agreements, jump-to-default risk, know your counterparty requirements, large private fund, liabilities to equity, LIBOR, limited purpose designations, liquidity, liquidity rights, longer-term leverage, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, Major Swap Participant, manager domicile, margin methodologies, mark-to-market exposure, market activity, market growth, market location, market-standard discount rate, master-feeder fund, minimum duration of status, mitigating commercial risk, msp, MSP definitions, MSP determination, MSP test, MSP thresholds, multiplier, non-ECP, non-investment grade, non-U.S. market, non-U.S. regulators., non-US domiciled fund, non-US entities, non-US securities, offshore fund, option expiration date, options on a swap, over-collateralization, overnight borrowing, physically settled swaptions, portfolio risk, potential future exposure calculation, potential future exposure test, potential systemic risk impact, Proposed Form PF section 1b, proposed form PF section 2(a), proposed form PF section 3, proposed form PF section 4, proposed Form PQR, quarters, question 11, question 27, question 38, question 47, question 5, question 68, reevaluation period, reference entity domicile, reproducible test, retail cash, Retail Forex Pool, risk factor multiplier, risk factor multipliers, risk mutualization, risk-mitigating tools, schedule B, SD, SD obligations, SEC, secured debt, Securities Exchange Commission, Security-Based Swap Dealer, security-based swaps, Senator Hagan, Senator Lincoln, short-term financing, short-term leverage, single-name CDS, smaller private fund, spread bank designation, substantial counterparty exposure, substantial position, swap rate, swap underlier, Swaps dealer, swaptions, systemic risk, systemically important, systemically important financial institution, term borrowings, threshold levels, tools of credit protection, trade verification, trading entity, traditional commodity pool, U.S. banking system, uncollateralized exposure, underlying instrument, undiversified market participant, United States financial markets, unpaid premiums, unsecured debt, upward adjustment, US entities, US Treasuries, valuation of collateral, variation margin, volatility,

Comment Letter to CFTC Responding to Proposed Regulations to Implement Federal Speculative Position Limits for Futures and Options Contracts04.26.10


MFA submitted comments to the CFTC in response to its request for comments on its proposed rule on Federal Speculative […]

Results 1 - 8 of 8