MFA Comment Letters

Related Rules: 76 FR at 8072

Comment Letter on Joint Release Regarding Reporting by Investment Advisors to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors on Form PF04.08.11


MFA filed a comment letter with the SEC and CFTC in response to their joint proposal to require private fund […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: absolute return strategies aggregate borrowings, aggregate gross asset value, alternative methodology, asset-backed securities, assets under management, audited financial statements, balance sheet value, beneficial owners, bespoke contracts, Bloomberg, borrowing arrangements, CCPs, CDS, CDX, central clearing counterparties, CFTC, clause (iii), collateral, collateral practices, commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors, confidentiality of information, confidentiality protections, corporate bonds, Council and Office of Financial Research, counterparty exposures, CR01, creditor, currency rates, CUSIP number, DCMs, de minimis, debt securities, default rates, delta adjusted, direct clearing members, direct investments, distressed debt, Dodd-Frank Act, duration, DV01, equity derivatives, equity exposure, equity prices, FCMs, Federal Reserve System, Financial Accounting Standards Board, Financial Stability Oversight Council, five-year option, fixed advisory fees, foreign currency contracts, foreign exchange derivatives, Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 13F, Form ADV, Form CPO, Form CTA-PR, Form PF, Form PF question 36, form PF questions 28 and 35, Form PQR, FSA, funds of funds, futures commission merchants, futures contracts, GAAP, generally accepted accounting principles, global regulators, GMV, gross asset value, hedge fund assets under management, hedge fund defaults, illiquid assets, inadvertent disclosure, inception class, individual certification, interconnectedness, interest rates, interpretive guidance, Investment Adviser Registration Depository, investment advisers, investment expenses, large private fund manager, lending institutions, Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, leverage, liquidity management, liquidity risk, LMV, loan commitments, long positions, managed futures, margin requirements, market noise, market participants, market value, master agreement, master-feeder, maturity brackets, maturity mismatch, NAV, net asset value, net assets under management, net borrowings, non-bank financial companies, non-rated issues, notional amount, notional value of derivatives, offsetting exposure, OFR, operational capabilities, operational efficiency, other quantitative strategies, overcounting, parallel funds, parallel managed accounts, performance fees, portfolio management, prime brokers, private equity, private fund managers, private funds, privately issued convertible bonds, proposed reporting thresholds, proprietary information, proprietary methodology, public companies, qualifying fund, record owners, recordkeeping requirements, regulatory assets under management, regulatory scrutiny, rehypothecated initial margin, reporting period, repos, risk capital allocation, risk methodology, Schedule 13G, SEC, section 404, semi-annual reporting, sensitivity analyses, short borrowing, short positions, short term high quality corporate debt, short-term interest rate, short-term market fluctuations, side pocket arrangement, SMV, statistical arbitrage-equity, strategy exposure, swap contracts, synthetic borrowing, systemic risk, systemically significant, targeted requests, ten-year option, the Fed, threshold, threshold for enhanced performance, tiered reporting system, trading and investment strategies, tri-party collateral accounts, turnover rate, UK Financial Services Authority, unaffiliated third party sources, uncommitted lines of credit, undercounting, valuation methodology, Value at Risk, VaR, variation margin,

Comment Letter to the SEC and CFTC on Definitions of “Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer (together, SDs), Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant (together MSPs) and Eligible Contract Participant (ECP)02.22.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC and CFTC on their joint proposed rule to further define swap dealer, […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: abnormal price movement acknowledgment requirements, applicable MSP thresholds, asset mix, bank capital standards, capital markets, cash settled swaptions, CDS, CDS protection, central clearing, centrally cleared positions, CFTC, Chicago mercantile exchange, clearing member defaults, clearinghouse, CME, commercial hedging, commercial loans, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, counterparty domicile, counterparty exposure, credit default swaps, credit ratings, credit spreads, creditworthiness, currency based institutions, current uncollateralized outward exposure test, daily mark requirements, daily variation margin calls, daily volatility, Dealer, dealers, default risk, delta weighting, deregistration period, discount factor, ECP, eligible contract participant, end-users, feeder fund, financial counterparty, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., Financial Stability Oversight Council, FINRA, fixed downside risk, Form PF, Form PQR, FSOC, fund domicile, future exposure discount, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, high yield credit swaps, high-grade corporate securities, highly leveraged, highly liquid assets, independent amount of collateral, independent variable, index CDS, index derivatives, index reference entity, inflation, initial margin, interest rate swap, investment grade, investment-grade credit swaps, ISDA master agreements, jump-to-default risk, know your counterparty requirements, large private fund, liabilities to equity, LIBOR, limited purpose designations, liquidity, liquidity rights, longer-term leverage, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, Major Swap Participant, manager domicile, margin methodologies, mark-to-market exposure, market activity, market growth, market location, market-standard discount rate, master-feeder fund, minimum duration of status, mitigating commercial risk, msp, MSP definitions, MSP determination, MSP test, MSP thresholds, multiplier, non-ECP, non-investment grade, non-U.S. market, non-U.S. regulators., non-US domiciled fund, non-US entities, non-US securities, offshore fund, option expiration date, options on a swap, over-collateralization, overnight borrowing, physically settled swaptions, portfolio risk, potential future exposure calculation, potential future exposure test, potential systemic risk impact, Proposed Form PF section 1b, proposed form PF section 2(a), proposed form PF section 3, proposed form PF section 4, proposed Form PQR, quarters, question 11, question 27, question 38, question 47, question 5, question 68, reevaluation period, reference entity domicile, reproducible test, retail cash, Retail Forex Pool, risk factor multiplier, risk factor multipliers, risk mutualization, risk-mitigating tools, schedule B, SD, SD obligations, SEC, secured debt, Securities Exchange Commission, Security-Based Swap Dealer, security-based swaps, Senator Hagan, Senator Lincoln, short-term financing, short-term leverage, single-name CDS, smaller private fund, spread bank designation, substantial counterparty exposure, substantial position, swap rate, swap underlier, Swaps dealer, swaptions, systemic risk, systemically important, systemically important financial institution, term borrowings, threshold levels, tools of credit protection, trade verification, trading entity, traditional commodity pool, U.S. banking system, uncollateralized exposure, underlying instrument, undiversified market participant, United States financial markets, unpaid premiums, unsecured debt, upward adjustment, US entities, US Treasuries, valuation of collateral, variation margin, volatility,
Results 1 - 2 of 2