MFA Comment Letters

Please contact Nick Simpson with any questions or technical difficulties. You can email your request to nsimpson@managedfunds.org or call 202-730-2600. MFA is continuously updating the database, so check back often when searching for comment letters.

Advanced Search Options

MFA Comments on SEC Regulatory Initiatives Under the Dodd-Frank Act09.22.10


MFA submitted initial comments to the SEC and the CFTC on regulatory initiatives in each agencys purview under the Dodd-Frank […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, financial regulatory system, hedge funds, financial crisis, institutional investors, OTC derivatives market, over-the-counter derivatives market, systemic risk, operational risk, transparency, capital markets, U.S. Banking Industry, Columbia University, Investment Company Institute, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, leverage, market discipline, investor confidence, market stability, risk capital, proprietary strategies, international coordination, financial risk, business risk, swap dealer, swap, Counterparty, market maker, futures commission merchant, FCM, futures, Major Swap Participant, msp, non-swap dealer, AIG, initial margin, variation margin, substantial position, offsetting position, clearing, central clearing, liquidity, regulatory capital requirements, creditor, depositor, Tier 1 capital, pension plans, endowments, cleared swaps, uncleared swaps, security-based swaps, collateral, non-bank MSP, Swap Execution Facility, SEF, futures market, risk management, central counterparties, CCP, risk model, customer protection, risk committee, proprietary asset, customer asset, third party custodian, segregation, omnibus account, individual account, reporting, Designated Contract Market, market integrity, physical market, position limits, contract market, commodity trading advisor, CTA, investment adviser, Peavey Commodity Futures Fund no-action letter, commodity pool operator, Financial Stability Oversight Council, FSOC, Office of Financial Research, owned funds, residual value, managed funds, investment portfolio, roll-over, commercial paper, credit exposure, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC, Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP, Federal Reserve, "too big to fail, bankruptcy law, Bondholder, private investment funds, mutual fund, client, pooled vehicle, pooled investment vehicle, Investor Protection, self-regulatory organization, SRO, investment adviser examination, Comptroller General of the United States, capital formation, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, OCIE, private funds, global banks, retail clients, proprietary information, Confidential Information, Venture Capital Fund, family office, accredited investor, qualified client, knowledgeable employees, transitional relief, performance reports, market makers, Broker, fiduciary, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, MSSP, registration, margin requirement, risk profile, financial entities, Price Manipulation, executive compensation, many-to-many platform, covered financial institution, Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements, Regulation D, disqalifying felons, Bad Actors, CUSIP number, short selling, Disclosure, price discovery, volatility, retail funds, global market, equity market, herding, Form SH, beneficial ownership, short swing profit reporting, fiduciary standard, Investor Advisory Committee, European Commission, EC, European Union, EU, European Parliament, EP, European Council of Finance Ministers, alternative investment funds, AIFs, SEC-registered advisers, Secretary Geithner, European Commissioner Michel Barnier, U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, non-bank financial companies,

Comment Letter to Responding to ESMA’s Call for Evidence Regarding Level 2 Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive01.14.11


On January 14, MFA submitted comments to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in response to a call for […]

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Draft Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.13.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIFMD the directive, Level 2, third party managers, European Commission, consultation paper, AIF, UCITS Directive, MiFID, professional investors, retail investors, marketing, counterparties, prime brokers, net asset value, Article 61, AUM, AUM Calculations, mark-to-market, EU investors, sub-investment managers, Dodd-Frank, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Advisers Act, registration, private funds, G-20, international coordination, Article 3(2), Article 9(3), professional indemnity insurance requirements, Gross Method, exposure, leverage, foreign exchange hedging position, interest rate hedging position, Box 93, Box 2, Box 1, NAV, Advanced Method, Box 13, diligence requirement, OTC transaction, securities lending agreement, repurchase agreement, Box 19, Box 29, risk management, risk limits, operational risk, portfolio management, market risk, portfolio risk, liquidity risk, gates, side pockets, redemption policy, depositaries, depositary, bespoke system, Box 78, collateral directive, Box 79, liability standards, Financial Services Authority, FSA, re-hypothecation provisions, Box 81, Box 86, due diligence, sub-custodian, Box 88, segregation, Box 89, omnibus accounts, liability regime, Box 95, Box 99, Value at Risk, VaR, Commitment Method, European Central Bank, ECB, Committee on European Securities Regulators, CESR Guidelines, credit default swap, CDS, remuneration, EU Passport, transparency, Box 106, passport regime, safe-keeping function, confidentiality, proprietary information, systemic risk, semi-annual reporting, collateral, counterparty exposures, Form PF, reporting period, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, valuation agents, underwriters, unobservable,

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.23.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on Third Country Provisions in the AIFMD. In our response, among other […]

MFA Submits Comments to ESMA on Short Selling and Sovereign CDS03.09.12


MFA submitted comments in response to ESMAs public consultation on possible delegated acts concerning the Regulation on short selling and […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: European Securities and Markets Authority ESMA, Regulation on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps, uncovered short sales and credit default swaps, Level 2 process, natural or legal person, short sale, civil law, securities law, sovereign issuer, EU Member State, net short positions, sovereign debt, long positions, convertible bond positions, France, Spain, Italy, Belgium, issued share capital, convertible debt securities, holding a share, financial instrument, short selling bans, quantitative threshold for high correlation, market participants, buffer periods, interest rates, Instituto de Credito Oficial, ICO, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Secretariat of State for the Economy, Financial Agency of Spain, liquid market price, maturity bucket, delta adjusted method, notional basis, convertible debt, broad-based indices, Eurostoxx, narrow-based indices/baskets, sector-specific, underlying shares, disaggregation, financial institutions, UK Financial Services Authority, FSA, anti-avoidance provision, publicly available information, debt instruments, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, AIFMD, credit quality, yield curve, sensitivity adjusted method, ETF, fund management activities, aggregation of positions, netting, pan-European short selling disclosure regime, CESR, delegate, group, consolidated accounts, credit default swap, default risk, uncovered credit default swap, sovereign CDS, hedged portfolios, asset managers, correlation test, intra-Member State correlation, subordinated debt, trust preferred securities, RBS, BNP Paribas, Societe Generale, interest rate swap, IRS, bank name CDS, emergent systemic risk, Greece, Ireland, Austria, Portugal, IRS curve, Italian CDS, sovereign bonds, credit protection, anticipated correlation, tail risk hedging, tail risk, severe market turmoil, reference asset, contract of insurance, Leonard Ng, Buttersworth Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, insurable interest, indices, supra-national European body, Markit iTraxx SovX Western Europe Index, proprietary models, listed securities, CDS transaction, eurozone, Italian lira, redenomination, uncovered position, static or dynamic hedging strategy, indirect exposures, threshold of liquidity, OTC instruments, legitimate market operations, illiquid shares, corporate bonds, money market instruments, UCITS, short selling, margin level, clearing house, option, future, swap, forward rate agreement, derivative instrument, central clearing, Italian CONSOB, convertible bonds, Member State regulator, sovereign CDS transactions,

MFA Response to FSA Discussion Paper on Implementation of the AIFMD03.23.12


Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: FSA Discussion Paper "Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive" Financial Services Authority, FSA, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, AIFMD, non-EU AIFM, Member State competent authorities, letter-box entity, MiFID, MiFID firm, AIFMD firm, retail customers, professional investors, remuneration provisions, CRD3 framework, functional and hierarchal independence, risk management, internationally coordinated approach to reporting, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, single AIFM, family relationship, family investment vehicle, UK AIFM, preferential treatment, side letters, retail consumers, FSA Principles for Business, FCA, UCITS Directive, retail investors, EU Passport, FCA Approach Document, conflicts of interest, SYSC 10 of the FSA Handbook, remuneration guidelines, MiFID portfolio managers, tier 4 firm, FSA Remuneration Code, compliance function, audit function, proportionality principle, regulatory requirements, regulatory risks, chief compliance officer, functional and hierarchical separation, portfolio management, portfolio management personnel, interest alignment, qualitative risk limit, UCITS investors, institutional investors, leverage, NAV, third country, Final Advice on the AIFMD, third country managers, capital requirements, PII requirements, IPRU (INV), professional indemnity insurance, professional negligence, internally managed AIF, CAD-defined terms, valuation procedures, external valuer, net asset value, limited partnership, hedge funds, NAV per share, liquidity requirements, redemption terms, less than fully invested, risk/return profile, net assets under management, investor capital, Value at Risk, VaR methodology, European Central Bank, foreign exchange, interest rate risk, EUR denominated bonds, portfolio risk, hedging arragements, CESR Guidelines on Risk Management and the Calculation of Global Exposure and Coutnerparty Risk for UCITS, CDS, Advanced Method, QIS disclosure requirements, prime brokers, exchanges, swap data warehouses, Dodd-Frank Act, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Form PF, proprietary business information, depositary, unregulated CIS, segregated account, valuation oversight duties, depositary liability, marketing, reverse solicitation process, MiFID investment services, private placement, public offers,