MFA Comment Letters

Please contact Nick Simpson with any questions or technical difficulties. You can email your request to nsimpson@managedfunds.org or call 202-730-2600. MFA is continuously updating the database, so check back often when searching for comment letters.

Advanced Search Options

Comment Letter Responding to FDIC’s Proposed Rules to Implement Certain Provisions of the Orderly Liquidation Authority in Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act.01.18.11


MFA filed a comment letter with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) in response to the FDICs proposed rules […]

Comment Letter to Responding to ESMA’s Call for Evidence Regarding Level 2 Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive01.14.11


On January 14, MFA submitted comments to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in response to a call for […]

Comment Letter to the Canadian Securities Administrators, Responding to Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 31-103, Registration of non-Canadian Investment Fund Managers01.13.11


On January 13, MFA filed a comment letter with the Canadian Securities Administrators in response to the CSAs proposed amendments […]

Comment Letter Regarding SEC Study on the Whether the Establishment of a Self-Regulatory Organization Would Improve the Frequency of Examinations of Investment Advisers12.16.10


MFA submitted a letter today providing comments to the SEC on Section 914 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires the […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: investment adviser examination self-regulatory organization, SRO, securities market, hedge fund managers, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Commodities Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, private fund manager, capital formation, broker dealers, oversight, derivative, derivatives trading activities, investment activity, insider trading, short selling, Disclosure, purchase, sale, nregistered securities, broker-dealer, clearing agencies, over-the-counter derivatives, OTC derivatives, swap dealers, swaps, major swap participants, msp, initial margin, variation margin, transparency, Transaction Reporting, systemic risk, assets under management, leverage, trading positions, counterparties, liquidation, Investor Protection, Compliance Policies, chief compliance officer, Obama Administration's Financial Regulatory Reform Proposals, Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury, National Association of Securities Dealers, NASD, over-the-counter securities markets, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, OCIE, forensic accounting, compliance, registration, check-the-box, fiduciary duty, securities transactions, investment advisory firm, financial planners, traditional asset management firm, wealth managers, small advisers, mutual fund, pension, FINRA, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, clearing, custody, securities lending, reporting, Financial Stability Oversight Council, FSOC, Investment Adviser Association and National Regulatory Services, Dodd-Frank Act,

MFAs Response to Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories11.11.10


MFAs Response to Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives European Union, central clearing, derivatives market, European Commission, Council on OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories, Over-the-counter Derivative Market, OTC, Risk Management Activities, Market Particpants, Class of Derivatives, clearing, Manadatory Clearing Obligation, interest rate swaps, IRS, central counterparties, CCPs, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, European Parliament, Council of Ministers, financial counterparty, Alternative Investment Fund, investment manager, Derivative Contracts, clearing obligation, operational risk, counterparty risk, transparency, competition, Top Down, Bottom Up, Determination Process, Trade Reporting Obligations, risk mitigation techniques, Segregated Exchange of Collateral, Proportionate Holding of Capital, capital requirements, Collateral Posting, Segregate and Exchange Margin, Hold Capital, initial margin, variation margin, Mark-to-Market Changes, Follow-on Effects, Market Exposure, Maximum Time Lag for Confirmation, systemic risk, third country CCPs, Non-European Countries, non-discriminatory access, Interoperability, Equivalency Test, Cross-Border Efficiency and Consistency, risk committees, Effective Supervision, Co-Operation Arrangement, Particpation Requirements, Admissable Clearing Members, Standard Capital Requirements, segregation, portability, Protection of Client Positions and Collateral, U.S. Treasury and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, U.K. House of Lords, European Policymakers, Insolvency Regimes, Unwinding Costs, Swiftly Collapse Offsetting Positions, Optimal Netting, Derivative Contract's Lifecycle, client collateral, Risk Profiles, Financial Strength, default, Trigger, Shortfall, Unmanageable Risk, capital formation, Investment Policy, Highly Liquid Collateral, Minimal Credit Risk, Highly Liquid Financial Instruments, market risk, credit risk, Highly Liquid, Denominated in G7 Currencies, Government Securities, default procedures, confidentiality, trade repositories, competent authorities, reasonable threshold, nexus, Coordination with Third-Country Regulators, Central Banks,

Comment Letter Responding to the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s Advance Notice and Request for Comment on the Criteria for Designating a Nonbank Financial Company as Systemically Important.11.05.10


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Financial Stability Oversight Council in response to the Councils advance notice and request […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Systemically Important Institutions Financial Stability Oversight Council, FSOC, Nonbank Financial Company, Systemically Important Financial Companies, market participants, Systemic Risk Monitoring, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System, Systemically Relevant Firms, Congress, "too big to fail, U.S. Financial Stability, hedge funds, Financial Market Participants, counterparty risk management, banks, broker-dealer, hedge fund industry, collateral, Borrowing, counterparties, capital markets, financial system, global mutual fund industry, U.S. Banking Industry, systemic risk, assets under management, leverage, Colombia University, Investment Company Institute, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, BofA Merrill Lynch, risk monitoring, due diligence, Collateral Posting, credit exposure, Structure of the Industry, Financial Assets, investment portfolio, sophisticated investors, ultra-high net worth individuals, retail investors, diversified portfolio, Liquidity Restrictions, Periods of Redemption, Redemptions, gates, Side Pocket Vehicles, Highly Illiquid Assets, alignment of interests, performance fees, high water marks, risk-adjusted returns, Legally Distinct Funds, Common Adviser, financial institutions, insurance companies, Long Term Capital Managment, LTCM, Position Size, Inadequate Counterparty Risk, leverage ratio, OTC Derivatives Trades, OTC, Counterparty Risk Management Policy Group, Fed Chairman Bernanke, Securities Exchange Commission, SEC, regulatory regime, over-the-counter derivatives, Standardized Transactions, swap dealers, major swap participants, CFTC, Cleared Transaction, Uncleared Transaction, margin requirements, prime brokerage, Short-Term Funding, overnight borrowing, asset mix, off-balance sheet exposures, bank holding companies, Equity Capital Stability, FDIC, FDIC deposit insurance, Debt Guarantees, Government-Issed Charter, Government-Funded Capital, Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP, Federal Reserve's Discount Window,