MFA Comment Letters

Please contact Scott McDonald with any questions or technical difficulties. You can email your request to smcdonald@managedfunds.org or call 202-730-2600. MFA is continuously updating the database, so check back often when searching for comment letters.

Advanced Search Options

MFA Submits Comments to ESMA in Response to Draft Technical Standards on OTC Derivatives, CCPs and Trade Repositories03.19.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in response to its Discussion Paper on […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: OTC derivatives European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, EMIR, European Union, EU, over-the-counter derivatives, central clearing, counterparty and operational risk, market oversight, market integrity, systemic risk, derivatives market, OTC derivatives market, ESMA Discussion Paper on Draft Technical Stanards for the Regulation on OTC Derivatives CCPs and Trade Repositories, central counterparty, CCP, risk management expertise, straight-through processing, CCPs governance structure, clearing, competitive execution, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, execution platform, alternative liquidity providers, electronic trading, real-time processing, international harmonization of regulations, client clearing models, third country counterparities, clearing obligation, extraterritorial application of EMIR, fund domicile, manager domicile, reference entity domicile, market location, reference security, underlying instrument, third country entities, principal of business, foreign exchange derivatives, interest rate derivatives, Euro, EU member currency, settlement currency, notional amount, indirect contractual arrangements, Cayman Islands, American Depository Receipt, ADR, Hong Kong, segregation, portability, indirect clearing models, guarantor, credit intermediary, execution documentation, credit intermediation, FIA-ISDA Cleared Derivatives Execution Agreement, futures commission merchant, FCM, swap dealer, SD, sublimit, Futures Industry Association, FIA, International Swap Derivatives Association, ISDA, clearing member, counterparty credit risk, indirect clearing, executing counterparty, back-to-back arrangements, trade acknowledgment, Dodd-Frank Act, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, security-based swaps, bespoke and customized transactions, electronically processed, CCP governance arragements, chief risk officer, chief technology officer, chief compliance officer, sound governance requirements, non-dealer representatives, risk committees, CCP committee, CCP Board, conflicts of interest, disclosure requirements, clients, record keeping, privacy and confidentiality of information, confidentiality agreements, CCP's margin models, confidence interval, liquidation period, lookback period, margin levels, margin requirements, technical standards, stress tesing, back testing, CCP data, non-default clearing members, clearing members, default, aggregation, public dissemination of information, transaction volumes, reasonably liquid traded instruments, confidentiality of counterparty identities, disclosure thresholds,

MFA, SIFMA and GFXD Submit Joint Letter to the CFTC with Proposed Safe Harbor for the ECP Definition01.19.12


On January 19, MFA, SIFMA, and GFXD submitted a joint letter to the CFTC with a proposed safe harbor from […]

Comment Letter to SEC and CFTC Regarding Definition of ‘Eligible Contract Participant’01.10.12


MFA and SIFMA submitted a letter and attachment to the CFTC and the SEC on their proposed definition of “eligible […]

MFA Submits Comment Letter to CFTC on Proposed Dodd-Frank Implementation Rules for Mandatory Swap Clearing, Trade Execution, and Margin Rules11.04.11


The OTC derivatives reforms (Title VII) resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act will cause sweeping transformation of the OTC derivatives markets […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, swaps, swap transaction, swap transaction compliance, clearing, trade execution, margining, margining requirements, Dodd-Frank Act, mandatory clearing, Rulemaking, Gary Gensler, central clearing, market participants, buy-side participants, end-user exemptions, product definition rules, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, security-based swaps, swap dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, collateral, full-scale clearing, uncleared swaps, liquidity, execution, Category 2 Entities, Category 1 Entities, active fund, buy-side market participants, private funds, swap execution facilities, SEF, Designated Contracts Markets, DCMs, real-time reporting, swap data, Regulators, derivatives clearing organization, futures commission merchants, FCM, non-dealer market participants, clearing mandate, G20, OTC derivatives, over-the-counter derivatives, exchanges, electronic platform, central counterparties, CCP, federal register, class of swaps, voluntary clearing, Category 3 Entities, Scott O'Malia, compliance schedules, compliance date, made available for trading, partial tear-ups, novations, third-party subaccount, non-MSP counterparties, interest rate swaps, broad-based index credit default swaps, commodity swaps, systemic risk, real-time clearing, cost-benefit analysis, price distortion, bilateral execution, execution venue, listing, security-based swap SEF, Category 4 Entities, trading documentation, phased implementation, transparency, prudential regulators, variation margin, netting, counterparties,