MFA Comment Letters

Please contact Nick Simpson with any questions or technical difficulties. You can email your request to nsimpson@managedfunds.org or call 202-730-2600. MFA is continuously updating the database, so check back often when searching for comment letters.

Advanced Search Options

MFA Submits Letter to ESMA on Draft Technical Standards on OTC Derivatives08.05.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) in response to its Consultation Paper on “Draft Technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: European Securities and Markets Authority ESMA, over-the-counter derivatives, OTC derivatives, CCP, trade repositories, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, OTC derivatives transactions, central counterparty, EMIR, central clearing, systemic risk, transparency, collateral, segregation, regulatory technical standards, straight-through processing, OTC derivatives market, market participants, Dealer, portability, client protections, contractual relationship, clearing member, CPSS-IOSCO, CPSS-IOSCO standards, CCP governing bodies, margin valuation, margin, risk management, risk management framework, conflicts of interest, fiduciary duty, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, proprietary trading tools, risk committee, derivatives contracts, derivatives, risk profile, interlocking governance arrangements, trading venues, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, internal controls, over-collateralization, in-the-money swap, "delta" hedge, swaps, credit default swap, CDS, negative correlation, capital, trading costs, credit risk, indirect clearing, non-linear products, Europe, European Union, EU, administrator, omnibus account, default, principal basis, agency basis, gross basis, net basis, LCH Clearnet, indirect client, direct client, close-out, extraterritorial application of EMIR, extraterritoriality, risk mitigation, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Asia, regulatory arbitrage, Regulators, counterparty risk, duplicative regulation, mutual recognition, third country regime, interpretive guidance, Cross-Border, index, foreign exchange, Euro, currency, interest rate derivatives, EU Member State, non-cleared OTC derivatives, compliance, default fund, portfolio reconciliation, portfolio compression, self-regulatory organization, SRO, swap dealers, major swap participants, Derivative Contracts, bilateral non-cleared OTC derivatives transactions, execution, hedging, upfront payment, floating rate payment, coupon, maturity, bespoke non-cleared trades, security-based swaps, debt-security based swaps, total return swaps, settlement prices, Proprietary Trading Strategy, public disclosure, confidence interval, margin requirements, financial instrument, posted collateral, interest rate swaps, Stan Ivanov, Lee Underwood, variation margin, initial margin, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III, liquidation horizons, bilateral counterparty credit risk, netting, transaction fees, liquidity fragmentation, affiliated market participants, money market instruments, credit institutions, stress testing, back testing,

MFA Submits Letter to ESMA on Straight-Through-Processing08.05.12


On August 5, MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to advocate for the […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority, OTC derivatives, CCP, trade repositories, straight-through processing, regulatory technical standards, EMIR, over-the-counter derivatives, derivatives, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, OTC derivatives transactions, central counterparty, systemic risk, counterparty credit risk, credit risk, market access, efficiency, operational market processes, clearing, execution, executing counterparty, market participants, clearing obligation, documentation, clearing member, interest rate swap, credit default swap, CDS, CME, Chicago mercantile exchange, alternative liquidity providers, liquidity, risk, electronic trading, bilateral derivatives transactions, bilateral master agreements, risk management, real-time processing, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, Designated Contract Market, DCM, Swap Execution Facility, SEF, execution platform, Allocations, cost-benefit analysis, European Union, EU, ESMA Task Forces, transparency, OTC Derivatives Task Force, CCP Requirements Task Force, Trade Repositories Task Force, derivatives transactions, international harmonization of regulations, Financial Stability Board, FSB, European Commission, delegated acts, customer clearing documentation, directive, due diligence, operational risk, Court of Justice of the European Union, Continental Cans, EU Member State, Commission v. Council ERTA, financial stability, Christopher Seagon v. Deko Marty Belgium NV, clearing agreement, financial system, United States, Dodd-Frank Act, real-time acceptance, competition, settlement, liquidity fragmentation, central limit order books, International Swaps and Dealers Association, ISDA, bid-ask spread, limit check, trading venues, credit intermediation, derivatives markets, bilateral risk management, volatility, derivatives clearing organization, DCO, swap dealer, Major Swap Participant, dealer-to-dealer clearing, dealer-to-customer platforms, mandatory clearing, clearinghouse, bilateral credit agreement, bilateral market, competitive liquidity, block transactions, investment managers, breakage, Futures Industry Association, FIA, trading desk, anti-competitive effects, ICE energy swaps, ICE Clear Credit LLC, LCH Clearnet, clearing acceptance process, trilateral documentation, designation notice, Managed Funds Association, bundled trade, futures, futures market, credit limit order bookc, credit limit, interconnectedness, dealers, real economy, pension fund, endowments, institutional investors, Liquidity Providers, trilateral clearing agreements, energy derivatives, technical standards, voice execution, matched transactions, direct clearing members, credit limits, risk-based, latency, transaction capture facility, anti-competitive restrictions, aggregate limit, underlying clients,

MFA Submits Joint Letter Requesting Extension of CFTC Cross-Border Comment Deadlines07.16.12


On July 16, MFA and nine other trade associations submitted a joint comment letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission […]

MFA Submits Amicus Brief on Issue of Creditor Coordination06.29.12


On June 29, MFA filed an amicus brief in the 11th Circuit en banc review of the CompuCredit case.  At […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Compucredit Holdings Corporation v. Akanthos Capital Management LLC, Loan Syndications and Trading Association, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, SIFMA, Moses Silverman, Aidan Synnott, Daniel Crane, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Edward Altman, Brendy Kuehne, New York University Salomon Center, Stern School of Business, John Coffee Jr., William Klein, Conrad Duberstein, Tomotaka Fujita, Marcel Kahan, corporate bonds, Michael MacKenzie, Nicole Bullock, Glenn Merrick, Ali Stoeppelwerth, banks, investment banks, broker-dealer, alternative investment industry, securities firms, capital formation, chilling effect, borrowers, distressed debt, contractual relationship, interest rates, creditor, credit squeeze, credit market, bonds, secondary loan markets, institutional lender, leverage, systemic risk, Shared National Credit Review, syndicated loan market, Bondholder, maturity date, debtor, Bankruptcy Filing, Bankruptcy Code, collective action risks, capital, primary market, risk portfolio, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Judge Easterbrook, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, price-fixing, hedge funds, price competition, contract, bilateral monopoly, per se rules, par value, debt instruments, high-velocity market, low-velocity market, creditor coordination, market power, anticompetitive, competition, pre-packaged bankruptcy, Broad. Music Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting Sys. Inc, Bus. Elecs. Corp. v. Sharp Elecs. Corp., Classic Cheesecake Co. Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. New York Life Ins. Co., Federal Trade Commission v. Brown Shoe Co., Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association, Finnegan v. Campeau Corp., United States v. Giordano, Ireland v. Craggs, Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, Maris Distrib. Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc., National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents, Northwest Wholesale Stationers Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co., Palmyra Park Hosp. Inc. v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Reisner v. General Motors Corp., Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank NA, Smith v. The Ferncliff, State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Physicians Injury Care Center Inc., United States v. Topco Assocs Inc., Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co., Unijax Inc. v. Champion International Inc., United Airlines Inc. v. U.S. Bank NA, Volt Info. Scis. Inc. v. Board of Trs. of Leland Stanford Jr. University,