MFA Comment Letters

Topic: side letters

MFA Response to FSA Discussion Paper on Implementation of the AIFMD03.23.12


Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: FSA Discussion Paper "Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive" Financial Services Authority, FSA, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, AIFMD, non-EU AIFM, Member State competent authorities, letter-box entity, MiFID, MiFID firm, AIFMD firm, retail customers, professional investors, remuneration provisions, CRD3 framework, functional and hierarchal independence, risk management, internationally coordinated approach to reporting, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, single AIFM, family relationship, family investment vehicle, UK AIFM, preferential treatment, side letters, retail consumers, FSA Principles for Business, FCA, UCITS Directive, retail investors, EU Passport, FCA Approach Document, conflicts of interest, SYSC 10 of the FSA Handbook, remuneration guidelines, MiFID portfolio managers, tier 4 firm, FSA Remuneration Code, compliance function, audit function, proportionality principle, regulatory requirements, regulatory risks, chief compliance officer, functional and hierarchical separation, portfolio management, portfolio management personnel, interest alignment, qualitative risk limit, UCITS investors, institutional investors, leverage, NAV, third country, Final Advice on the AIFMD, third country managers, capital requirements, PII requirements, IPRU (INV), professional indemnity insurance, professional negligence, internally managed AIF, CAD-defined terms, valuation procedures, external valuer, net asset value, limited partnership, hedge funds, NAV per share, liquidity requirements, redemption terms, less than fully invested, risk/return profile, net assets under management, investor capital, Value at Risk, VaR methodology, European Central Bank, foreign exchange, interest rate risk, EUR denominated bonds, portfolio risk, hedging arragements, CESR Guidelines on Risk Management and the Calculation of Global Exposure and Coutnerparty Risk for UCITS, CDS, Advanced Method, QIS disclosure requirements, prime brokers, exchanges, swap data warehouses, Dodd-Frank Act, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Form PF, proprietary business information, depositary, unregulated CIS, segregated account, valuation oversight duties, depositary liability, marketing, reverse solicitation process, MiFID investment services, private placement, public offers,

MFA Comments to the U.K. Hedge Fund Working Group’s Consultation Paper12.14.07


Today, MFA submitted the following response letter to the U.K. Hedge Fund Working Group on its Consultation Paper. The overall […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Hedge Fund Working Group consultation paper, HFWG, Sound Practices for Hedge Fund Managers, United Kingdom, global relevance, global alternative investment industry, hedge funds, funds of funds, managed futures funds, jurisdictional requirements, fund governing bodies, Third Party Administrators, board of directors, U.S. based funds, net asset value, compliance, Comply or Explain, managers, investors, counterparties, bright line test, Fund Governing Body, President's Working Group on Private Pools of Capital (PWG), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), offshore, non-U.S. exchanges, Irish Stock Exchange, Luxembourg Stock Exchange, regulatory implicationsm Websites, segregation, potential conflicts, third parties, Investment Policy, Risk Disclosure, potential liability, Performance Measurement Disclosure, non-marketable, illiquid securities, portfolio, marketable securities, valuation determinations, Chartered Financial Analyst Institute, Global Investment Performance Standards, independent valuation services providers, portfolio management, independent third parties, independent in-house functions, Difficult-to-Value Assets, exchange traded posistions, uncertainity, Fair Value, fire sale, Disclosure, market price, audited annual accounts, side pocket, market risk, stress testing, Governance of Operational Risk, conflicts of interest, compliance procedures, client confidentiality, Outsourcing Risk, service legal agreement, Key Performance indicators (KPis) Fund Governance Disclosure, spectrum, Market Abuse, Insider Dealing, inside information, disclosure thresholds, U.S. securities law, UK, AML, side letters, commercial terms, reconciliation errors, valuation, legal risks, regulatory risks, trade association, board of trustees, investor groups, Regulators, Lenders/Prime Brokers/Dealers, OTC market particpants, cross-market particpant working group, OTC derivatives transactions, Federal Reserve Bank of New York for OTC equity derivatives, OTC electronic transaction posistions, price sources, cherry picking, performance fee, scenario analyses, counterparty risk, netting agreements, collateral agreements, collateral calls/two way collateral posting, soft limits, Model Risk, Key man risk, one-stop shop, prime brokers, Derivative posistions, Borrowed Stock, exposure, stock lender, proxy voting policy, Alternative Investment Management Association, AIMA,

MFA Submits Comments to SEC on Proposals for Accredited Natural Person and Antifraud Rules03.09.07


MFA submits comment letter and attachment to the SEC on Proposals for Accredited Natural Person and Antifraud Rules.

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, private investment vehicles, Accredited Natural Person Proposal, Prohibition of Fraud by Advisers to Certain Pooled Investment Vehicles, Investor Protection, alternative investment industry, capital markets, hedge funds, managed futures funds, President's Working Group on Financial Markets, PWG, private pools, liquidity, price efficiency, risk distribution, Regulatory Structure, direct investment, Christopher Cox, Robert Steel, venture capital, private equity, industry innovation, Department of the Treasury, cash room, Randal Quarles, Senate Committee on Banking Housing and Urban Affairs, risk-adjusted performance, accredited investor standard, financial eligibility standards, accredited investor, pooled investment vehicles, net worth threshold, financial eligibility standard, Pui-Wing Tam, Jonathan Shieber, Stephen Heuser, qualified client, qualified purchaser, qualified institutional buyer, qualified eligible person, eligible contract participant, joint property, net worth, Office of Economic Analysis, 3(c)(1) funds, illiquid investments, real estate, Lock-up, U.S. economy, Stuatory Authority, 100 beneficial owners, beneficial owners, 3(c)(7) funds, deferred compensation, fund employees, American Bar Association, research analysts, legal counsel, traders, broker dealers, attorneys, brokers, compliance, operational, accounting officers, grandfathering provision, competition, start-up funds, antifraud proposal, Goldstein decision, scienter, transparency, dialogue, Request for Proposal, private placement memorandum, Limited Partnership Agreement, Subscription Agreement, due diligence, management, incentive compensation, conflicts of interest, side letters, withdrawal, transfer procedures, tax issues, ERISA Issues, Thomas Lemke,
  • Page
  • 1