MFA Comment Letters

Topic: short selling regulation

MFA and AIMA Submit Joint Letter to ESMA in Response to Call for Evidence on Short Selling Regulation03.15.13


MFA and AIMA jointly submitted a comment letter to ESMA responding to its Call for Evidence regarding its evaluation of […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority, AIMA, Alternative Investment Management Association, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, short selling, credit default swap, CDS, short selling regulation, Europe, equity, assets under management, AUM, harmonization, competent authorities, reporting requirements, short positions, European Commission, operational challenges, short selling bans, market participants, securities, sovereign issuer, capital, liquidity, price discovery, market distortions, hedging, risk, sovereign debt, Latvia, bond, sovereign bonds, EU Member State, futures, futures market, public disclosure, stock, reverse engineer, efficiency, short squeeze, volatility, reporting obligation, T+1 reporting, hedge funds, price formation, corporate issuer, Lehman Brothers, duration, delta, derivatives, share capital, index derivatives, AIFMD, MiFID, EMIR, net short position, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, BaFin, United Kingdom, Commissione Nazionale per le Societa e la Borsa, Committee of European Securities Regulators, CESR, issued share capital, T+2, Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, settlement, locate, prime broker, index, third party managers, technical standards, non-EU investment firms, extraterritoriality, reasonable expectation, uncovered sovereign CDS, eurozone, mark-to-market, single-name CDS, France, Spain, Italy, trading volume, Steven Maijoor, bid-ask spreads, price efficiency, derivative instrument, depositary receipts, London Stock Exchange, PRNewswire, Stock Exchange Daily Official List, compliance, market disruption, interpretive guidance,

MFA Comments to SEC on Interim Final Temporary Amendments to Regulation SHO12.15.08


MFA sent a letter to the SEC providing comments to the Commission’s interim final temporary rule on amendments to Reg […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, emergency orders, short selling, manipulative naked short selling, market dislocations, market participants, liquidity, public interest, efficiency, competition, capital formation, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA, broker-dealer, naked short selling, pricing efficiency, Short Selling Activity in Financial Stocks, SEC July 15 Emergency Order, Arturo Bris, European Corporate Governance Institute, Yale International Center for Finance, three-day settlement cycle, capital raising, risk management, derivatives hedging strategies, hedging, distressed companies, capital, market risk, "delta" hedge, volatility, public companies, fails to deliver, securities, close-out, Voting Rights, prime broker, algorithmic trading, automated trading, manual trading, short selling regulation, clearing, settlement, uptick rule, sell-side firms, buy-side firms, hard to borrow shares, easy to borrow shares, locate, threshold securities list, threshold securities, self-regulatory organization, SRO, short positions, short squeeze, operational efficiency, bid-ask spreads, options, market maker, long sales, market efficiency, market liquidity, delivery, securities depositaries, custodian banks, executing brokers, Continuous Net Settlement, National Securities Clearing Corporation, NSCC, clearing agency, settlement date, market distortions, order to purchase, artificial buying pressure, borrowing costs, G19, G19 securities, Wall St. Journal, regulatory efficiencies, mandatory close-out, T+5, T+2, T+4, pre-fail credit, NYSE, New York Stock Exchange, debt securities, arrangement to borrow,
  • Page
  • 1