MFA Comment Letters

Topic: risk mitigation techniques

MFA Submits Comments to European Supervisory Authorities in Response to Joint Discussion Paper on Risk Mitigation Techniques04.02.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Supervisory Authorities in response to their Discussion Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, European Supervisory Authorities, ESA, European Union, EU, over-the-counter derivatives, OTC derivatives, central clearing, risk-based margin requirements, risk mitigation techniques, European Banking Authority, European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority, European Commission, liquidity, segregation regime, initial margin, posting party, receiving party, bankruptcy-remote, prudentially regulated financial counterparties, PRFC, segregation, netting, margin, investment firms, credit institutions, insurance undertakings, assurance undertakings, reinsurance undertakings, institutions for occupational retirement provision, non-cleared derivative contracts, hedging, prudential regulators, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, counterparty credit risk, bilateral initial margin arrangements, variation margin, capital, derivatives markets, net margin, best practices, collateralization, non-cleared OTC derivatives, over-collateralization, highly correlated assets, credit default swap, CDS, interest rate swap, Eurodollar futures, physically-settling forwards, repurchase agreements, security lending agreements, intraday change, segregation of counterparty assets, NPRFC, non-prudentially regulated financial counterparties, NFCs+, non financial counterparties above the clearing threshold, non-cleared derivatives, buy-side firms, asymmetry, current market practice, perceived systemic relevance, systemic importance, uncollateralized, exposures, credit exposure, Basel rules, uniformity of application, due diligence, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel II, Basel III, creditworthiness, regulatory arbitrage, major swap participants, deep and liquid markets, substantial position in swaps, substantial counterparty exposure, international harmonization of regulations, bilateral exchange, market transparency, covered swap entities, de minimi exception, mark-to-market, standardized method, internal models, competitive advantages, discriminatory distortions, internal model method, legally required transparency, incremental compliance costs, segregated account, independent third party custodian, insolvency estate, tri-party custodial arrangements, bilateral arrangements, non-financial assets, eligible collateral, revaluation, haircuts, EMIR, margin calculations, daily valuation of collateral, dispute resolution procedures, party-specific variables,

MFAs Response to Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories11.11.10


MFAs Response to Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives European Union, central clearing, derivatives market, European Commission, Council on OTC Derivatives, Central Counterparties and Trade Repositories, Over-the-counter Derivative Market, OTC, Risk Management Activities, Market Particpants, Class of Derivatives, clearing, Manadatory Clearing Obligation, interest rate swaps, IRS, central counterparties, CCPs, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, European Parliament, Council of Ministers, financial counterparty, Alternative Investment Fund, investment manager, Derivative Contracts, clearing obligation, operational risk, counterparty risk, transparency, competition, Top Down, Bottom Up, Determination Process, Trade Reporting Obligations, risk mitigation techniques, Segregated Exchange of Collateral, Proportionate Holding of Capital, capital requirements, Collateral Posting, Segregate and Exchange Margin, Hold Capital, initial margin, variation margin, Mark-to-Market Changes, Follow-on Effects, Market Exposure, Maximum Time Lag for Confirmation, systemic risk, third country CCPs, Non-European Countries, non-discriminatory access, Interoperability, Equivalency Test, Cross-Border Efficiency and Consistency, risk committees, Effective Supervision, Co-Operation Arrangement, Particpation Requirements, Admissable Clearing Members, Standard Capital Requirements, segregation, portability, Protection of Client Positions and Collateral, U.S. Treasury and U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, U.K. House of Lords, European Policymakers, Insolvency Regimes, Unwinding Costs, Swiftly Collapse Offsetting Positions, Optimal Netting, Derivative Contract's Lifecycle, client collateral, Risk Profiles, Financial Strength, default, Trigger, Shortfall, Unmanageable Risk, capital formation, Investment Policy, Highly Liquid Collateral, Minimal Credit Risk, Highly Liquid Financial Instruments, market risk, credit risk, Highly Liquid, Denominated in G7 Currencies, Government Securities, default procedures, confidentiality, trade repositories, competent authorities, reasonable threshold, nexus, Coordination with Third-Country Regulators, Central Banks,
  • Page
  • 1