MFA Comment Letters

Topic: redemption rights

MFA Submits Comments on AIFMD Remuneration09.27.12


MFA submitted comments to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on its consultation on guidelines on sound remuneration policies […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority, remuneration, consultation paper, remuneration policies, AIFMD, European Union, EU, Policy Makers, proportionality principle, AIFM, excessive risk-taking, Identified Staff, limited liability partnership, LLP, management committees, junior partner, RemCo, deferral of remuneration and pension, European Commission, Council of the European Union, European Parliament, hedge fund managers, financial institutions, deposit-taking entity, government insurance, private placement, institutional investor, sophisticated investors, bank, Insurance, alignment of interests, owner-managed AIFM, shareholders, public shareholders, third country, Regulators, carried interest, fees, service providers, commissions, delegate, performance fee, Senior Management, investors, other risk taker, risk profile, Balance Sheet, own account dealer, operational risk, United Kingdom, affiliated group, governing body, Limited Liability Company, LLC, risk management, compliance, audit, compliance staff, counsel, chief compliance officer, control functions, parent company, credit institutions, capital requirements, MiFID, MiFID firms, distributions, minimum capital requirements, management bodies, non-executive directors, hedge funds, assets under management, AUM, Member State, Member State competent authorities, control function, pension, variable remuneration, risk alignment, material risk, UCITS, performance measures, deferred remuneration, non-deferred remuneration, Claw-Back, fee structure, redemption rights, tax, Tax Implications, bonuses, underperformance, alternative instruments, retention policy, financial stability, non-EU AIFM, marketing, EU Passport, private placement regime, Disclosure, Annual Report, Confidential Information, stakeholders,

MFA Comments to SEC on Pay to Play Proposal10.06.09


MFA submitted a letter to the SEC today in response to its proposal to, among other things, restrict political contributions […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, pay to play practices, government assets, political contributions, investment adviser, investment management services, government entities, third party placement agents, municipal securities, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, MSRB, investment management industry, municipal underwritings, municipal securities underwriters, municipal securities professional, chief compliance officer, American Bar Association, Committee on Federal Regulation of the American Bar Association, state and local entities, legal authorities, compliance burden, agency, authority, instrumentality of the State, plan, program, pool of assets, political action committee, inauguration or transition committee, local or state political party, Foundation, charitable institution, government official, Regulators, covered associates, general partner, executive officer, Broker, Dealer, municipal securities business, municipal securities representative, municipal securities principals, sales principals, principal business unit, look-back provision, look-back period, securities firms, academic institutions, chilling effect, soliciting, personal political activities, beneficial owners, family members of covered associates, portfolio manager, written compliance policies and procedures, pre-approval procedures, disproportionately severe punishment, private fund, limited partnership, redemption rights, public pension plans, interest, contractual rights and obligations, management fees, liquidity, fund assets, redemption requests, investment services, fiduciary duty, assets, compensation arrangements, institutional investor, incentive fee structure, backward-looking provisions, operational challenges, compliance procedures, pooled investment vehicle, de minimi exception, returned contribution, Inadvertent Violation, inadvertent contribution, covered investment pool, registered investment companies, publicly offered securities, fund of funds, direct investment, platform arrangement, direct investors, third party placement agent, pension, third party solicitors, placement agent, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, offshore managers, marketing activities, broker-dealer, requests for proposals, due diligence, investment advisory services, investment techniques, investment objectives, risk management, anti-competitive effects, California Public Employees' Retirement System, CalPERS, CalSTRS, Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement System, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System, New Mexico Educational Retirement Board, Teacher Retirement System of Texas, Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Pennsylvania State Employment Retirement System, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Washington, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New Mexico Investment Council, New York, Illinois, pay to play scandals, Disclosure, transparency, state and federal laws, regulations, registration, cash solicitation, Wall St. Journal, code of ethics rule, compliance costs, Form ADV, registered investment adviser, unregistered adviser, pre-approval policies, affiliated broker-dealer,

MFA Comments to SEC on FINRA Regulation of Compensation, Fees and Expenses in Public Offerings of Real Estate Investment Trusts and Direct Participation Programs06.04.08


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC on FINRA’s rule 2810 with respect to trail commissions along with the […]

  • Page
  • 1