MFA Comment Letters

Topic: OTC transaction

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Draft Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.13.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIFMD the directive, Level 2, third party managers, European Commission, consultation paper, AIF, UCITS Directive, MiFID, professional investors, retail investors, marketing, counterparties, prime brokers, net asset value, Article 61, AUM, AUM Calculations, mark-to-market, EU investors, sub-investment managers, Dodd-Frank, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Advisers Act, registration, private funds, G-20, international coordination, Article 3(2), Article 9(3), professional indemnity insurance requirements, Gross Method, exposure, leverage, foreign exchange hedging position, interest rate hedging position, Box 93, Box 2, Box 1, NAV, Advanced Method, Box 13, diligence requirement, OTC transaction, securities lending agreement, repurchase agreement, Box 19, Box 29, risk management, risk limits, operational risk, portfolio management, market risk, portfolio risk, liquidity risk, gates, side pockets, redemption policy, depositaries, depositary, bespoke system, Box 78, collateral directive, Box 79, liability standards, Financial Services Authority, FSA, re-hypothecation provisions, Box 81, Box 86, due diligence, sub-custodian, Box 88, segregation, Box 89, omnibus accounts, liability regime, Box 95, Box 99, Value at Risk, VaR, Commitment Method, European Central Bank, ECB, Committee on European Securities Regulators, CESR Guidelines, credit default swap, CDS, remuneration, EU Passport, transparency, Box 106, passport regime, safe-keeping function, confidentiality, proprietary information, systemic risk, semi-annual reporting, collateral, counterparty exposures, Form PF, reporting period, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, valuation agents, underwriters, unobservable,

MFA Comments on Consultation on Increasing Short Position Transparency10.09.09


MFA submitted a letter to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) today in response to its Consultation Paper […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Futures Commission SFC, short positions, Hong Kong, manipulative conduct, short selling, efficiency, liquidity, public disclosure of short positions, price discovery, risk management, financial stocks, net long position, financial services sector, non-public disclosure, confidentiality, market participants, anonymised disclosure, short selling bans, global equity markets, bid-ask spreads, short sellers, short selling disclosure regime, transparency, cash markets, close out indicators, on-market transactions, derivatives, exchange trading, off-exchange transaction, hedging strategies, stocks, delta adjusted, designated securities, listed corporations, non-designated securities, OTC transaction, dual-listed securities, CESR, pan-European short selling disclosure regime, primary market, Hong Kong market, net short positions, transitory short position, reporting threshold, FSA, Financial Services Authority, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, turnover ratio, price volatility, capital raising, settlement, SEHK, market volatility, investment managers, private reporting, chilling effect, market efficiency, price formation, short squeeze, herding, volatility, institutional investors, retail investors, transaction costs, alternative investment classes, pensions, endowments, foundations, market liquidity, capital formation, convertible arbitrage, convertible bonds, copycat behavior, proprietary research, market making, Journal of Finance,
  • Page
  • 1