MFA Comment Letters

Topic: operational challenges

MFA and AIMA Submit Joint Letter to ESMA in Response to Call for Evidence on Short Selling Regulation03.15.13


MFA and AIMA jointly submitted a comment letter to ESMA responding to its Call for Evidence regarding its evaluation of […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority, AIMA, Alternative Investment Management Association, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, short selling, credit default swap, CDS, short selling regulation, Europe, equity, assets under management, AUM, harmonization, competent authorities, reporting requirements, short positions, European Commission, operational challenges, short selling bans, market participants, securities, sovereign issuer, capital, liquidity, price discovery, market distortions, hedging, risk, sovereign debt, Latvia, bond, sovereign bonds, EU Member State, futures, futures market, public disclosure, stock, reverse engineer, efficiency, short squeeze, volatility, reporting obligation, T+1 reporting, hedge funds, price formation, corporate issuer, Lehman Brothers, duration, delta, derivatives, share capital, index derivatives, AIFMD, MiFID, EMIR, net short position, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, BaFin, United Kingdom, Commissione Nazionale per le Societa e la Borsa, Committee of European Securities Regulators, CESR, issued share capital, T+2, Bundesanstalt fur Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, settlement, locate, prime broker, index, third party managers, technical standards, non-EU investment firms, extraterritoriality, reasonable expectation, uncovered sovereign CDS, eurozone, mark-to-market, single-name CDS, France, Spain, Italy, trading volume, Steven Maijoor, bid-ask spreads, price efficiency, derivative instrument, depositary receipts, London Stock Exchange, PRNewswire, Stock Exchange Daily Official List, compliance, market disruption, interpretive guidance,

MFA Comments to SEC on Pay to Play Proposal10.06.09


MFA submitted a letter to the SEC today in response to its proposal to, among other things, restrict political contributions […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, pay to play practices, government assets, political contributions, investment adviser, investment management services, government entities, third party placement agents, municipal securities, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, MSRB, investment management industry, municipal underwritings, municipal securities underwriters, municipal securities professional, chief compliance officer, American Bar Association, Committee on Federal Regulation of the American Bar Association, state and local entities, legal authorities, compliance burden, agency, authority, instrumentality of the State, plan, program, pool of assets, political action committee, inauguration or transition committee, local or state political party, Foundation, charitable institution, government official, Regulators, covered associates, general partner, executive officer, Broker, Dealer, municipal securities business, municipal securities representative, municipal securities principals, sales principals, principal business unit, look-back provision, look-back period, securities firms, academic institutions, chilling effect, soliciting, personal political activities, beneficial owners, family members of covered associates, portfolio manager, written compliance policies and procedures, pre-approval procedures, disproportionately severe punishment, private fund, limited partnership, redemption rights, public pension plans, interest, contractual rights and obligations, management fees, liquidity, fund assets, redemption requests, investment services, fiduciary duty, assets, compensation arrangements, institutional investor, incentive fee structure, backward-looking provisions, operational challenges, compliance procedures, pooled investment vehicle, de minimi exception, returned contribution, Inadvertent Violation, inadvertent contribution, covered investment pool, registered investment companies, publicly offered securities, fund of funds, direct investment, platform arrangement, direct investors, third party placement agent, pension, third party solicitors, placement agent, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, offshore managers, marketing activities, broker-dealer, requests for proposals, due diligence, investment advisory services, investment techniques, investment objectives, risk management, anti-competitive effects, California Public Employees' Retirement System, CalPERS, CalSTRS, Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement System, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System, New Mexico Educational Retirement Board, Teacher Retirement System of Texas, Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Pennsylvania State Employment Retirement System, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Washington, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New Mexico Investment Council, New York, Illinois, pay to play scandals, Disclosure, transparency, state and federal laws, regulations, registration, cash solicitation, Wall St. Journal, code of ethics rule, compliance costs, Form ADV, registered investment adviser, unregistered adviser, pre-approval policies, affiliated broker-dealer,
  • Page
  • 1