MFA Comment Letters

Topic: NAV

MFA Response to FSA Discussion Paper on Implementation of the AIFMD03.23.12


Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: FSA Discussion Paper "Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive" Financial Services Authority, FSA, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, AIFMD, non-EU AIFM, Member State competent authorities, letter-box entity, MiFID, MiFID firm, AIFMD firm, retail customers, professional investors, remuneration provisions, CRD3 framework, functional and hierarchal independence, risk management, internationally coordinated approach to reporting, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, single AIFM, family relationship, family investment vehicle, UK AIFM, preferential treatment, side letters, retail consumers, FSA Principles for Business, FCA, UCITS Directive, retail investors, EU Passport, FCA Approach Document, conflicts of interest, SYSC 10 of the FSA Handbook, remuneration guidelines, MiFID portfolio managers, tier 4 firm, FSA Remuneration Code, compliance function, audit function, proportionality principle, regulatory requirements, regulatory risks, chief compliance officer, functional and hierarchical separation, portfolio management, portfolio management personnel, interest alignment, qualitative risk limit, UCITS investors, institutional investors, leverage, NAV, third country, Final Advice on the AIFMD, third country managers, capital requirements, PII requirements, IPRU (INV), professional indemnity insurance, professional negligence, internally managed AIF, CAD-defined terms, valuation procedures, external valuer, net asset value, limited partnership, hedge funds, NAV per share, liquidity requirements, redemption terms, less than fully invested, risk/return profile, net assets under management, investor capital, Value at Risk, VaR methodology, European Central Bank, foreign exchange, interest rate risk, EUR denominated bonds, portfolio risk, hedging arragements, CESR Guidelines on Risk Management and the Calculation of Global Exposure and Coutnerparty Risk for UCITS, CDS, Advanced Method, QIS disclosure requirements, prime brokers, exchanges, swap data warehouses, Dodd-Frank Act, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Form PF, proprietary business information, depositary, unregulated CIS, segregated account, valuation oversight duties, depositary liability, marketing, reverse solicitation process, MiFID investment services, private placement, public offers,

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Draft Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.13.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIFMD the directive, Level 2, third party managers, European Commission, consultation paper, AIF, UCITS Directive, MiFID, professional investors, retail investors, marketing, counterparties, prime brokers, net asset value, Article 61, AUM, AUM Calculations, mark-to-market, EU investors, sub-investment managers, Dodd-Frank, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Advisers Act, registration, private funds, G-20, international coordination, Article 3(2), Article 9(3), professional indemnity insurance requirements, Gross Method, exposure, leverage, foreign exchange hedging position, interest rate hedging position, Box 93, Box 2, Box 1, NAV, Advanced Method, Box 13, diligence requirement, OTC transaction, securities lending agreement, repurchase agreement, Box 19, Box 29, risk management, risk limits, operational risk, portfolio management, market risk, portfolio risk, liquidity risk, gates, side pockets, redemption policy, depositaries, depositary, bespoke system, Box 78, collateral directive, Box 79, liability standards, Financial Services Authority, FSA, re-hypothecation provisions, Box 81, Box 86, due diligence, sub-custodian, Box 88, segregation, Box 89, omnibus accounts, liability regime, Box 95, Box 99, Value at Risk, VaR, Commitment Method, European Central Bank, ECB, Committee on European Securities Regulators, CESR Guidelines, credit default swap, CDS, remuneration, EU Passport, transparency, Box 106, passport regime, safe-keeping function, confidentiality, proprietary information, systemic risk, semi-annual reporting, collateral, counterparty exposures, Form PF, reporting period, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, valuation agents, underwriters, unobservable,

Comment Letter on Joint Release Regarding Reporting by Investment Advisors to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors on Form PF04.08.11


MFA filed a comment letter with the SEC and CFTC in response to their joint proposal to require private fund […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: private funds commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors, Form PF, systemic risk, Financial Stability Oversight Council, market participants, managed futures, absolute return strategies, SEC, CFTC, Dodd-Frank Act, Council and Office of Financial Research, OFR, global regulators, overcounting, undercounting, threshold for enhanced performance, assets under management, reporting period, confidentiality protections, inadvertent disclosure, non-bank financial companies, lending institutions, interconnectedness, liquidity risk, maturity mismatch, regulatory scrutiny, systemically significant, Federal Reserve System, the Fed, Form CPO, Form PQR, Form CTA-PR, targeted requests, tiered reporting system, threshold, trading and investment strategies, borrowing arrangements, collateral practices, operational capabilities, illiquid assets, investment advisers, bespoke contracts, private equity, privately issued convertible bonds, equity derivatives, distressed debt, unaffiliated third party sources, generally accepted accounting principles, GAAP, Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, Financial Accounting Standards Board, audited financial statements, UK Financial Services Authority, FSA, Form 13F, public companies, Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, portfolio management, CUSIP number, semi-annual reporting, counterparty exposures, market noise, short-term market fluctuations, margin requirements, hedge fund defaults, large private fund manager, qualifying fund, hedge fund assets under management, Form ADV, proposed reporting thresholds, interpretive guidance, private fund managers, recordkeeping requirements, section 404, confidentiality of information, proprietary information, Investment Adviser Registration Depository, Schedule 13G, individual certification, valuation methodology, proprietary methodology, alternative methodology, de minimis, master-feeder, parallel funds, equity prices, interest rates, currency rates, Form PF question 36, form PF questions 28 and 35, funds of funds, direct investments, aggregate gross asset value, collateral, operational efficiency, ten-year option, five-year option, master agreement, regulatory assets under management, net assets under management, leverage, parallel managed accounts, net asset value, gross asset value, creditor, net borrowings, aggregate borrowings, beneficial owners, record owners, fixed advisory fees, investment expenses, performance fees, inception class, statistical arbitrage-equity, other quantitative strategies, strategy exposure, risk capital allocation, NAV, futures commission merchants, FCMs, direct clearing members, DCMs, prime brokers, clause (iii), loan commitments, offsetting exposure, tri-party collateral accounts, market value, asset-backed securities, debt securities, swap contracts, futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, notional value of derivatives, notional amount, long positions, short positions, LMV, SMV, maturity brackets, short-term interest rate, DV01, CR01, duration, non-rated issues, short term high quality corporate debt, foreign exchange derivatives, turnover rate, GMV, Bloomberg, risk methodology, repos, sensitivity analyses, liquidity management, balance sheet value, delta adjusted, variation margin, equity exposure, rehypothecated initial margin, CCPs, central clearing counterparties, Value at Risk, VaR, CDS, CDX, default rates, corporate bonds, short borrowing, synthetic borrowing, uncommitted lines of credit, side pocket arrangement,

MFA Comments to SEC on Proposed Rule Change by American Stock Exchange to List and Trade Shares of Nuveen Commodities Income and Growth Fund10.15.07


MFA submits comments to the SEC on an American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) rule proposal which would permit commodity pools to […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission American Stock Exchange Pursuant, Nuveen commodities Income and Growth Fund, Amex, closed-end exchange-listed commodity pool, future offerings, Portfolio Holdings, closed-end commodity pool, investor, share, liquidity, market price per share, redeemable security, surplus, Issuer, proportionate share, net assets, cash equivalent, net asset value per share, NAV, demand, supply asset-classes, investment strategies, exchange traded fund, ETF, baskets, net asset value per basket, qualified institutions, portfolio holding, disclosures, securities, daily portfolio composition information, Redemption, creation or redemption transactions, hegde, exposure, robust secondary market, index-tracking vehicles, transparency, index mutual fund, commodity pool, redeemable shares, significant premium, discount, potential harm, closed-end fund, portfolio composition rules, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, market participants, exchange-listed pool, trading posistions, reverse engineer, front-run, National Futures Association, NFA, futures industry, Interpretive Notice, equitable principles, commodity futures business, commodity trading advisor, CTA, investment adviser, hedge funds, managed future strategies, Closed-End Registered Investment Companies, RIC, closed-end exchange-traded registered investment companies, Great Depression, exchange-traded commodity pools, continuous offering, redeemable securities, U.S. Congress, Listed Company Manual of the NYSE, SEC,

MFA Comments to IOSCO on Consultation Report on Principles for the Valuation of Hedge Fund Portfolios06.21.07


MFA submits comment letter to IOSCO on its Consultation Report on Principles for the Valuation of Hedge Fund Portfolios.

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: IOSCO IOSCO's 2007 32nd Annual Conference, Mumbai., India, valuation of investments, hedge funds, global set of principles, conflicts of interest, investors, IOSCO Report, Investment Portfolios, hedge fund management, hedge fund managers, global alternative investment industry, advocate, absolute return strategies, public, private sector, United States, Securities and Exchange Committee, SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commision, CFTC, Federal Reserve, Department of the Treasury, state agencies, Congress, major dealers, derivative market practices, advisory, government bodies, United Kingdom's Financial Services Authority, FSA, Securities Exchange Board of India, MFA's 2005 Sound Practices, Investor Protection, key market soundness, Management and Internal Trading Controls, Responsibilites to Investors, Valuation Policies and Procedures, Business Continutiy and Disaster Recovery, President's Working Group on Financial Markets, PWG, risk management, internal trading controls, Regulatory Controls, Transactional Practices, business continuity, disaster recovery, valuation, macro-level guidance, operational framework, risk monitoring, U.S. regulatory Filings, anti-money laundering, Checklist for Compliance Manuals, Checklist for Code of Ethics, consistency, independence, transparency, financial instruments, market prices, Instrument, organized exchanges, data vendors, governing body, third parties, mission-critical, Third Party Service Providers, investment portfolio, global capital markets, portfolio strategies, material obstacles, net asset value, NAV, Fair Value, pricing poliies and sources, price validation, financial statement close process,