MFA Comment Letters

Topic: limited partnership

MFA Submits List of Priorities to CFTC Chairman Massad and Commissioners07.30.14


MFA submitted letters to Timothy Massad, the newly confirmed Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), along with the […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: CFTC Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Timothy Massad, Mark Wetjen, Scott O'Malia, Sharon Bowen, J. Christopher Giancarlo, swaps, commodity pool operators, CPO, commodity trading advisors, CTA, alternative investment strategies, Dodd-Frank Act, OTC derivatives, systemic risk, transparency, central clearing, swap execution facilities, SEF, designated contract markets, DCM, regulation, package transactions, market infrastructures, recordkeeping requirements, swap data reporting, Cross-Border, central counterparties, CCP, third country, regulatory requirements, alternative investment funds, EMIR, JOBS Act, private investment vehicles, regulatory framework, hedge fund, fund of funds, private equity fund, real estate investment trust, burdensome, CPO delegation, temporary interim relief, private funds, harmonization, no-action relief, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Policy Makers, customer protection, U.S. Congress, Bankruptcy Code, futures commission merchant, FCM, legal segregation with operation commingling, LSOC, market participant, MF Global Inc., Peregrine Financial Group, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Peregrine Financial Group Inc. and Russel R. Wasendorf, segregated account, FCM counterparty, position limits, buy-side, straight-through processing, made available for trading, MAT, inter-dealer market, anonymity, execution, proprietary trading tools, dealer-to-customer platforms, liquidity, derivatives clearing organization, DCO, Dealer, interest rate markets, swap curves, swap butterflies, invoice spreads, swaptions, Vincent A. McGonagle, exchange for related position, EFRPs, benchmark contracts, SIFMA AMG, Asset Management Group of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, Division of Market Oversight, introducing broker, assets under management, AUM, trading privileges, commodity pool, floor brokers, Alternative Investment Management Association, AIMA, swap data repository, SDR, Commodity Markets Council, alpha swap, beta swap, gamma swap, Major Swap Participant, MSPs, European Union, EU, bespoke swaps, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, ISDA, master agreement, European Commission, OTC Derivatives Regulators Group, mandatory clearing, United States, Cayman Islands, U.S. person, swap dealer, financial counterparty, commodity interests, privately offered commodity pools, Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission, Financial Conduct Authority, Hong Kong, Securities and Futures Commission, private investment funds, limited partnership, general partner, corporations, Trust, limited liability companies, public investment fund, board of directors, chilling effect, NFA, National Futures Association, due diligence, compliance, registered investment adviser, President Obama, Obama Administration, U.S. Department of the Treasury, quarterly account statements, service providers, illiquid assets, Form PF, Form CPO-PQR, Form CTA-PR, custody rules, generally accepted accounting principles, GAAP, Form PQR, haircuts, Committee of Payment and Settlement Systems, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, Financial Stability Board, FSB, risk management, initial margin, variation margin, loss allocation, Full Physical Segregation, customer collateral, collateral, insolvency, cleared swaps, hedgers, short, price discovery, spot-month position limits, physically settled, cash-settled contracts, natural gas, gold, silver, owned entities, passive ownership, exemptive relief, speculation, aggregation,

MFA Response to FSA Discussion Paper on Implementation of the AIFMD03.23.12


Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: FSA Discussion Paper "Implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive" Financial Services Authority, FSA, Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, AIFMD, non-EU AIFM, Member State competent authorities, letter-box entity, MiFID, MiFID firm, AIFMD firm, retail customers, professional investors, remuneration provisions, CRD3 framework, functional and hierarchal independence, risk management, internationally coordinated approach to reporting, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, single AIFM, family relationship, family investment vehicle, UK AIFM, preferential treatment, side letters, retail consumers, FSA Principles for Business, FCA, UCITS Directive, retail investors, EU Passport, FCA Approach Document, conflicts of interest, SYSC 10 of the FSA Handbook, remuneration guidelines, MiFID portfolio managers, tier 4 firm, FSA Remuneration Code, compliance function, audit function, proportionality principle, regulatory requirements, regulatory risks, chief compliance officer, functional and hierarchical separation, portfolio management, portfolio management personnel, interest alignment, qualitative risk limit, UCITS investors, institutional investors, leverage, NAV, third country, Final Advice on the AIFMD, third country managers, capital requirements, PII requirements, IPRU (INV), professional indemnity insurance, professional negligence, internally managed AIF, CAD-defined terms, valuation procedures, external valuer, net asset value, limited partnership, hedge funds, NAV per share, liquidity requirements, redemption terms, less than fully invested, risk/return profile, net assets under management, investor capital, Value at Risk, VaR methodology, European Central Bank, foreign exchange, interest rate risk, EUR denominated bonds, portfolio risk, hedging arragements, CESR Guidelines on Risk Management and the Calculation of Global Exposure and Coutnerparty Risk for UCITS, CDS, Advanced Method, QIS disclosure requirements, prime brokers, exchanges, swap data warehouses, Dodd-Frank Act, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Form PF, proprietary business information, depositary, unregulated CIS, segregated account, valuation oversight duties, depositary liability, marketing, reverse solicitation process, MiFID investment services, private placement, public offers,

Comment Letter Responding to SECs Proposed Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management, and Foreign Private Advisers01.24.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC in response to the SECs proposal Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, Exemptions, venture capital funds, Private Fund Advisers, assets under management, foreign private advisers, Exemptions Release, Private Fund Registration, Statutory Exemption, commodity trading advisors, Single Investor Private Funds, investor, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, commodity trading advisor, CTA, Securities-Related Advice, CFTC, Peavey Commodity Futures Fund, SEC No-Action Letter, 1983 SEC No-Act. LEXIS 2576, Tonopah Mining Co. of Nevada, 26 S.E.C. 426, Subadvisers, Subsidiary Advisers, Regulatory Authority, Investment Adviser Industry, Specialized Expertise, Foreign Advisers and Subadvisers, no-action letters, Domestic, Non-U.S. Investment Advisory Firms, Control, Participating Affiliate, Mercury Asset Management Plc., affiliate letters, Registered and Non-Registered Entities, Factual Representations, Associated Persons, Full Regulatory Access, oversight, Non-Registered Adviser, Multi-Jurisdicational Advisory Firms, Non-U.S. Activities, systemic risk, Hedge Fund Adviser Registration Rules, Unio de Banco de Brasileiros S.A., Kleinwort Benson Investment Management Limited, AMRO Bank N.V., Royal Bank of Canada, ABA Subcommittee on Private Investment Entities, Compliance and Management Structures, Non-Control, affiliated entities, U.S. law, Non-U.S. Law, Affiliated Person, Form ADV, private fund, Master-Feeder Structure, Side-by-Side Structure, Specialized Feeder, Outstanding Voting Securities, pooled investment vehicle, limited partnership, Limited Liability Company, Independent Verification of Assets Requirement, general partner, Nominal Capital Account, Limited Partner, Instrument, total return swap, Record Owner, Equity Security, prudential regulators, Secretary of the Treasury, Security-Based Swap, Staff Responses to Questions About the Custody Rule, Question VI.11, Voting Rights, Redemption, Transparency Rights, regulatory assets under management, de minimis exemption, Regulatory Assets, separate account structure, Gross Assets Calculation, Fair Value, valuation methodology,

MFA Comments to SEC on Pay to Play Proposal10.06.09


MFA submitted a letter to the SEC today in response to its proposal to, among other things, restrict political contributions […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, pay to play practices, government assets, political contributions, investment adviser, investment management services, government entities, third party placement agents, municipal securities, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, MSRB, investment management industry, municipal underwritings, municipal securities underwriters, municipal securities professional, chief compliance officer, American Bar Association, Committee on Federal Regulation of the American Bar Association, state and local entities, legal authorities, compliance burden, agency, authority, instrumentality of the State, plan, program, pool of assets, political action committee, inauguration or transition committee, local or state political party, Foundation, charitable institution, government official, Regulators, covered associates, general partner, executive officer, Broker, Dealer, municipal securities business, municipal securities representative, municipal securities principals, sales principals, principal business unit, look-back provision, look-back period, securities firms, academic institutions, chilling effect, soliciting, personal political activities, beneficial owners, family members of covered associates, portfolio manager, written compliance policies and procedures, pre-approval procedures, disproportionately severe punishment, private fund, limited partnership, redemption rights, public pension plans, interest, contractual rights and obligations, management fees, liquidity, fund assets, redemption requests, investment services, fiduciary duty, assets, compensation arrangements, institutional investor, incentive fee structure, backward-looking provisions, operational challenges, compliance procedures, pooled investment vehicle, de minimi exception, returned contribution, Inadvertent Violation, inadvertent contribution, covered investment pool, registered investment companies, publicly offered securities, fund of funds, direct investment, platform arrangement, direct investors, third party placement agent, pension, third party solicitors, placement agent, hedge fund managers, hedge funds, offshore managers, marketing activities, broker-dealer, requests for proposals, due diligence, investment advisory services, investment techniques, investment objectives, risk management, anti-competitive effects, California Public Employees' Retirement System, CalPERS, CalSTRS, Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement System, Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System, New Mexico Educational Retirement Board, Teacher Retirement System of Texas, Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Pennsylvania State Employment Retirement System, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Washington, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New Mexico Investment Council, New York, Illinois, pay to play scandals, Disclosure, transparency, state and federal laws, regulations, registration, cash solicitation, Wall St. Journal, code of ethics rule, compliance costs, Form ADV, registered investment adviser, unregistered adviser, pre-approval policies, affiliated broker-dealer,
  • Page
  • 1