MFA Comment Letters

Topic: investment fund

MFA and AIMA Submit Joint Letter to CFTC on Further Proposed Cross-Border Guidance02.06.13


MFA and AIMA jointly submitted a comment letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on its “Further Proposed Guidance […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, Cross-Border, swaps, duplicative regulation, Alternative Investment Management Association, AIMA, Dodd-Frank Act, prime brokers, hedge fund managers, U.S. person, interpretive guidance, market participants, Corporation, partnership, Limited Liability Company, LLC, Trust, joint-stock company, direct or indirect ownership, commodity pool, pooled accounts, collective investment vehicles, commodity pool operator, CPO, pension, estate, income tax, principal place of business test, investment manager, limited liability partnership, LLP, investment fund, ownership test, derivatives, OTC derivatives, over-the-counter derivatives, OTC derivatives market, international harmonization of regulations, regulatory framework, swap dealer, Major Swap Participant, msp, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, central counterparty, CCP, trade repositories, mandatory clearing requirements, clearing, central clearing, systemic risk, Gary Gensler, Mary Schapiro, OTC derivatives reform, CPPSS-IOSCO, IOSCO, International Organization of Securities Commissions, European Union, EU, Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Hong Kong, Monetary Authority of Singapore, Singapore, MAS, foreign regulators, Dealer, buy-side market participants, registration, adviser registration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, OCC, majority ownership, Look Through, fund of funds, listed entity, Form CPO-PQR, de minimis, commodities, phase-in period, execution, G20, G20 commitments, transparency,

MFA Submits Letter to IRS on Proposed Rules on Dividend Equivalent Payments04.06.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Internal Revenue Service on the IRS proposed rules under Section 871(m) of the […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Internal Revenue Service IRS, dividend equivalent, tax avoidance, market participants, contractual representations, undue market disruption, swaps, delta-one instruments, customized index, derivatives, equity linked derivatives markets, in connection with standard, in the market, crossing transactions, short-term trades, high-frequency trading, gross witholding, cascading witholding taxes, special dividends, witholding agent, FATCA, specified notional principal contracts, SNPC, outstanding positions, dividend equivalent payments, abusive practices, non-U.S. persons, out-of-the-money, equity-linked swaps, options, futures, underlying security, strike price, dividend payment, dividend swaps, long-party, short-party, future dividend flow, anti-abuse rule, delta-one, International Swaps and Dealers Association, ISDA, delta, delta one instrument, non-delta one instrument, 90-Day Rule, retested, market forces, broad-based indices, market sector, credit, leverage, trading strategies, recognized independent index publisher, options contracts, proprietary index, preferred stock, common stock, illiquid securities, derivatives transactions, private funds, public float, hedge, synthetic exposure, offsetting position, individual trade determinations, investment algorithms, compliance restrictions, long equity swap, investment fund, single strategy fund, multi-strategy fund, average daily trading volume, ADTV, public float test, Bloomberg, direct or indirect "cross", crossing, full notional amount, internal tax review system, real-time identification of offsetting positions, 30 day liquidity, Department of the Treasury, overwitholding, extraordinary dividend, Options Clearing Corporation, OCC, ordinary divident, special dividend, OTC option, options market,