MFA Comment Letters

Topic: international regulatory standards

MFA Submits Letter to SEC on Proposed Capital, Margin, and Segregation Rules02.22.13


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on its proposed rules on “Capital, Margin, and […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, margin, capital, segregation, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, capital requirements, broker-dealer, risk, security-based swaps, customer collateral, Dodd-Frank Act, CFTC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Private Funds Managers, Investor Protection, regulation, international regulatory standards, efficiency, capital formation, liquidity, collateral, margin requirements, market participants, variation margin, netting, margining, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA, international harmonization of regulations, regulatory arbitrage, federal register, bilateral exchange of variation margin, best practices, counterparty risk, systemic risk, risk management, portfolio margining, securities, cross-product master netting agreements, initial margin, financial system, asset class, counterparties, prudential regulators, leverage, derivatives, tri-party custodial arrangements, customer protection, omnibus segregation, default, fellow customer risk, legal segregation with operation commingling, LSOC, swap dealers, Major Swap Participant, Individual Segregation, buy-side firms, non-commercial end-users, hedge funds, credit risk, capital inefficiency, transparency, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, Working Group on Margining Requirements, central clearing, compliance, registered clearing agencies, mandatory clearing, compliance date, two-way margining, reform, collateral management, asymmetrical initial margin exchange, pension, endowments, university endowment, financial crisis, "too big to fail, too interconnected to fail, American International Group, AIG, House Committee on Financial Services, Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Board, 111th Congress, financial contagion, financial institutions, asymmetry, portfolio reconciliation, portfolio compression, Swap Trading Relationship Documentation, swap dealer, collateral management stystems, trading costs, complexity, settlement risk, credit default swap, CDS, OTC derivatives, forwards, repurchase agreements, Value at Risk, VaR, financial instrument, cross-margining, Options Clearing Corporation, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., New York Portfolio Clearing LLC, LCH.Clearnet Ltd., customer replicability, proprietary information, reconciliation, market risk, haircuts, Cash Flow, pro-cyclical effects, creditworthiness, multiplier, customized risk management tools, sell-side firms, liquidation time horizon, product type, market practice, ISDA, U.S. dollar, settlement, money market instruments, eligible collateral, capital charge, Lehman Brothers, bankruptcy, bankruptcy estate, third-party custody arrangement, enhanced protections, Notice of Exclusive Control, Investment Company Institute, ICI, White Paper, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, SIFMA, liquidation, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, tentative net capital, dealers, Eric Chern, Chicago Trading Company, \, operational risk, Security-Based Swap Transactions, Darrell Duffie, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 424, ICE Clear Europe Limited, segregation model, DCO, derivatives clearing organization, portability, insolvency, out-of-the-money, operational and legal commingling, default segregation model, MF Global Inc., Peregrine Financial Group, Fraud, investment risk, Russell Wasendorf, accounting, operational costs, Broker, Dealer, ISDA Margin Survey 2012, European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, central counterparty, CCP, trade repositories, commodity broker, Bart Chilton, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, Robert Wasserman, independent third party custodian, state bank regulator, state and federal laws,

MFA Submits Letter to Department fo the Treasury Regarding Review by the Treasury Department of the Regulatory Structure Associated with Financial Institutions11.21.07


MFA submits letter to the U.S. Department of the Treasury in response to its request for recommendations on how to […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Department of the Treasury Regulatory Structure, optimal regulatory structure, marketplace, hedge funds, managed futures funds, Policy Makers, global alternative investment industry, trading business activties, United States, state securities regulators, regulatory oversight, regulatory framework, conflicting regulatory edicts, private sector self-regulation, Sound Practices for Hedge Fund Managers, peer-to-peer guidance for hedge fund managers, valuation, Portfolios, risk management, adequate disclosure, hedge fund investors, international organizations, International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), Market Particpants, public interest, market and financial integrity, United Kingdom's Financial Services Authority (FSA), Japan's Financial Services Agency, BaFin, Australia, Netherlands, twin peaks model, prudential safety, soundness regulation, conduct-of-business, U.S. capital market competitiveness, Investor Protection, market price transparency, principles-based approach, rules-based approach, flexibility, futures exchange, derivatives clearing organizations, safe harbor, compliance, exchange, statutory core principles, uniform set of basic principles of regulation, public interest goals, customer protections, retail foreign exchange (FX), transactions, Fraud, Congress, state regulators, local law enforcement, Europe, Financial Services Action Plan, Asian Countries, regions, international regulatory standards, costs, foreign markets, competitiveness concerns, G-8 finance ministers and deputies, international portfolio valuation principles, securities, futures, intermediaries, common stock, options contracts, ownership interest, capital raising process, stock index, natural gas, gold, wheat, stock price, stock world, net long, higher prices, short, fair prices, financial products, bonds, security futures, futures contracts, underlying asset, crude oil, currency options template, trading platforms, liquid trading markets, margin area, risk-based performance bond system, margin levels, options trading, natural gas futures price manipulation, substantial inefficiency, intemediary brokerage firms, duplicative systems, unwarranted costs, portfolio margining, collateral management stystems, financial integrity systems, net capital, cross-recognition efficiencies, commodity pool operator, private pools of capital, NFA, mutual, business models, retail customers, Disclosure, public managed futures fund offerings, FINRA, futures brokerage commission payments, federal government, wholesale, commercial, hedging, derivatives, commodity pool operators, collective investment vehicles, pool offerings, tired system of regulation, private transactions, counterparites, funds, exchanges, regulation of intermediaries, Henry Paulson, financial institutions, fund of funds, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, CFTC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, National Futures Association, President's Working Group on Financial Markets, PWG, Financial Services Roundtable, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC,
  • Page
  • 1