MFA Comment Letters

Topic: General Advertising

MFA Submits Letter in Response to SEC Investor Advisory Committee Recommendations on Implementation of the JOBS Act03.22.13


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in response to its proposed implementation of Section […]

Petition to SEC for Rulemaking on Rule 502 of Regulation D, Ban General Solicitation01.06.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC requesting that the Commission amend Rule 502(c) of Regulation D to eliminate […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Petition for Rulemaking Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Offers or Sales Securities, Private Funds Managers, Economic Growth, Competitiveness, Job Creation, Independent Regulatory Agencies, Investor Protections, Offerings or Sales, private funds, Administrative Costs, sophisticated investors, House of Representatives, United States Congress, Ban on General Solicitation and Advertising, Senate, Public Offering, investment company, Interpretive Framework, Broadcast Over Television, Radio, Fund Managers, Issuer, Selling Agent, Pre-Existing Substantive Relationship, Continuous Offerings, Limited Partnerships, Broker, accredited investors, Pre-Existing Relationship Doctrine, Qualified Potential Investors, Industry Conferences, Inquiries, Legal Costs, Business Practices, transparency, hedge funds, Policy Makers, Regulators, Proprietary Investment Data, Systemic Risk Assessment, Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets, Disclosure, Third-Party, oversight, Private Offering, prime brokers, Auditors, General Solicitation, General Advertising, Fraud, Unsophisticated Investors, Ban on General Solicitation, Protecting Investors: A Half Century of Investment Company Regulation, Division of Investment Management, Investor Criteria, qualified purchasers, Division of Corporation Finance, Anti-Fraud Provisions, Wealth Tests, Federal Securities Laws, Chairman Schapiro, Congressman Darrell Issa, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Investor Protection, capital formation, Inadvertent Violation, Waiting Period, Consulting Firm, Subscription Agreement,

MFA Letter to SEC Chairman Cox Regarding Hedge Fund Transparency and Other Issues04.24.08


MFA President and CEO, Richard H. Baker, met with SEC Chairman Christopher Cox this morning and discussed the topics addressed […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, Christopher Cox, alternative investment industry, Policy Makers, Regulators, investors, hedge funds, hedge fund offerings, transparency, hedge fund investors, capital markets, systemic risk, General Solicitation, Ban on General Solicitation and Advertising, General Advertising, safe harbor, Regulation D, hedge fund managers, sophisticated investors, accredited investors, qualified purchasers, private offerings, securities, Protecting Investors: A Half Century of Investment Company Regulation, Division of Investment Management, United States Congress, Implications of the Growth of Hedge Funds Staff Report to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Rulemaking, advertising materials, Clover Capital no-action letter, staff guidance, no-action letters, accredited natural person, large accredited investor, Federal Securities Laws, inflation, mutual recognition, Nancy Morris, regulatory barriers, Cross-Border Investments, market participants, transaction costs, global capital markets, financial services industry, Australia, European Union, EU, Canada, broker-dealer, best practices, Sound Practices for Hedge Fund Managers, NYRO OCIE, chief compliance officer, trade associations, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, Memorandum of Understanding, public commodity pools, National Futures Association, NFA, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA, public commodity pool offerings, futures, futures market, pooled investment vehicle, public offering disclosure requirements, Direct Participation Programs, DPP, annual cap, lifetime cap, offering proceeds, trail commissions, managed futures, brokers,

MFA Letter to Senate Republican Capital Markets Task Force Regarding United States Capital Markets Competitiveness in the Global Financial Services Marketplace02.29.08


MFA submits a comment letter to the Senate Republican Capital Markets Task Force in response to the Task Force’s request […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Senate Republican Capital Markets Task Force United States Congress, capital markets, U.S. Capital Markets, global financial system, regulatory regime, tax, capital formation, capital efficiencies, financial regulatory system, principles-based regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, regulation, non-U.S. investors, capital, hedge funds, venture capital funds, oil and gas partnerships, Strategy and Financial Innovation, Investor Protection, Financial Services Roundtable, Blue Print for U.S. Financial Competitiveness, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, safe harbor, exchanges, market crisis, market participants, duplicative regulation, public commodity pools, National Futures Association, NFA, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA, commodity futures markets, energy commodities, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC, natural gas futures market, Federal Trade Commission, financial services industry, President's Working Group on Financial Markets, PWG, Department of the Treasury, Secretary of the Treasury, Federal Reserve Board, assets under management, investment advisers, retail investors, prudential regulators, Henry Paulson, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, OCIE, Economic Club of New York, no-action letters, General Solicitation, General Advertising, transparency, Cross-Border, U.S. immigration policies, skilled non-U.S. professional workers, H-1B visa, student visa, harmonization, generally accepted accounting principles, GAAP, International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS, mutual recognition, Canada, Enron Corporation, Cendant, Financial Services Forum, United Kingdom, European Union, EU, chilling effect, equity markets,

MFA Comments to SEC Regarding Proposals to Revise Limited Offering Exemptions in Regulation D10.19.07


MFA submits a comment letter to the SEC regarding their proposals to revise the limited offering exemptions in Regulation D.

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Limited Coffering Exemptions global alternative investment industry, hedge funds, managed futures funds, policymaker, flexibility, issuers, Accerdited Investor, accredited natural person, offers, securities, limited announcement, offering, pooled investment vehicles, transactions, Public Offerings, General Solicitation, General Advertising, investor, accredited investor, higher dollar-amount thresholds, qualification, capital, Private Pooled Investment Vehicle Release, financial sophistication standards, federal regulations, natural persons, privated pools of captial, inflation, financial eligibility standard, joint income thresholds, Office of Economic Analysis, capital formation, compliance, implications of the growth of hedge funds, Offerings, private placement offerings, qualifies purchasers, Qualified Purchaser Definition, Qualified Client Definition, marital assets, Joint Investments, qualified client, qualified purchaser, Subscription Agreement, pooled investment fund, subscription agent, sophisticated investors, United States, Future Inflation Adjustment, dollar-amount threshols, private placement, knowledgeable employees, Trust Grantors, Trustees, beneficiaries, Sophisticated Investor Standards, risk, transaction costs, economic efficiency, Investor Protection, Investor relations professionals, research analysts, attorneys, traders, brokers, traders of a fund affiliate, senior financial, operational, accounting officers, risk/return, deferred compensation, net worth, investments tests, Issuer, fund principals, pooled investment funds, retention tool, start up company, sotck, equity owners, primary beneficiary, Grandfathered, inflation adjustments, dollar-amount thresholds, grandfather provision, due diligence, committed capital, Interation Safe Harbor, transparency, Manner of Offering, sale limitations, Disqualification Provisions, predecessor, affiliated issuer, director, executive officer, general partner, managing member, 20% beneficial owner, promoter, cease and desist, Fraud, Form D, blue sky filing, bad actor disqualification provisions, recdivism, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Congress, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, threshold,