MFA Comment Letters

Topic: commodity pool operators

Comment Letter on Joint Release Regarding Reporting by Investment Advisors to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors on Form PF04.08.11


MFA filed a comment letter with the SEC and CFTC in response to their joint proposal to require private fund […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: private funds commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors, Form PF, systemic risk, Financial Stability Oversight Council, market participants, managed futures, absolute return strategies, SEC, CFTC, Dodd-Frank Act, Council and Office of Financial Research, OFR, global regulators, overcounting, undercounting, threshold for enhanced performance, assets under management, reporting period, confidentiality protections, inadvertent disclosure, non-bank financial companies, lending institutions, interconnectedness, liquidity risk, maturity mismatch, regulatory scrutiny, systemically significant, Federal Reserve System, the Fed, Form CPO, Form PQR, Form CTA-PR, targeted requests, tiered reporting system, threshold, trading and investment strategies, borrowing arrangements, collateral practices, operational capabilities, illiquid assets, investment advisers, bespoke contracts, private equity, privately issued convertible bonds, equity derivatives, distressed debt, unaffiliated third party sources, generally accepted accounting principles, GAAP, Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, Financial Accounting Standards Board, audited financial statements, UK Financial Services Authority, FSA, Form 13F, public companies, Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, portfolio management, CUSIP number, semi-annual reporting, counterparty exposures, market noise, short-term market fluctuations, margin requirements, hedge fund defaults, large private fund manager, qualifying fund, hedge fund assets under management, Form ADV, proposed reporting thresholds, interpretive guidance, private fund managers, recordkeeping requirements, section 404, confidentiality of information, proprietary information, Investment Adviser Registration Depository, Schedule 13G, individual certification, valuation methodology, proprietary methodology, alternative methodology, de minimis, master-feeder, parallel funds, equity prices, interest rates, currency rates, Form PF question 36, form PF questions 28 and 35, funds of funds, direct investments, aggregate gross asset value, collateral, operational efficiency, ten-year option, five-year option, master agreement, regulatory assets under management, net assets under management, leverage, parallel managed accounts, net asset value, gross asset value, creditor, net borrowings, aggregate borrowings, beneficial owners, record owners, fixed advisory fees, investment expenses, performance fees, inception class, statistical arbitrage-equity, other quantitative strategies, strategy exposure, risk capital allocation, NAV, futures commission merchants, FCMs, direct clearing members, DCMs, prime brokers, clause (iii), loan commitments, offsetting exposure, tri-party collateral accounts, market value, asset-backed securities, debt securities, swap contracts, futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, notional value of derivatives, notional amount, long positions, short positions, LMV, SMV, maturity brackets, short-term interest rate, DV01, CR01, duration, non-rated issues, short term high quality corporate debt, foreign exchange derivatives, turnover rate, GMV, Bloomberg, risk methodology, repos, sensitivity analyses, liquidity management, balance sheet value, delta adjusted, variation margin, equity exposure, rehypothecated initial margin, CCPs, central clearing counterparties, Value at Risk, VaR, CDS, CDX, default rates, corporate bonds, short borrowing, synthetic borrowing, uncommitted lines of credit, side pocket arrangement,

MFA Joins Amicus Curiae Brief in the case of Hunter v. FERC Regarding Jurisdiction to Regulate Futures Trading07.08.10


MFA, together with FIA, CME and NFA, filed an amicus curiae brief in the Hunter v. FERC case. In our […]

MFA Letter to FTC on Prohibition of Energy Market Manipulation Rule05.20.09


MFA jointly with FIA, CME Group, ICE and NFA submitted a letter to the Federal Trade Commission regarding its “Prohibition […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Federal Trade Commission FTC, Market Manipulation Rulemaking, futures group, Part 317, anti-manipulation protections, non-futures, wholesale markets, crude oil, gasoline, commodities, Manipulation, fraud proscriptions, Commodity Futures Trade Commission, CFTC, petroleum distillates, exclusive jurisidiction provision, safe harbor, federal register, exclusive jurisdiction provision, price discovery, forward market business activities, regulatory, CEA, anti-manipulation system, false reports, commodity prices, resource limitations, congressional grant, energy markets, John M. Damgard, Futures Industry Association, FIA, Jerrold E. Salzman, CME Group Inc., Thomas W. Sexton, National Futures Association, NFA, Jeffrey Sprecher, IntercontinentalExchange, ICE, Donald S. Clark, Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, wholesale purchase, options trading, energy futures, futures exchange, Chciago Mercantile Exchange Inc., Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., CBOT, new York Mercantile Exchange Inc., NYMEX, Commodity Exchange, COMEX, ICE Futures U.S., New York Board of Trade, ICE Futures of Europe, ICE Futures Canada, Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, over-the-counter energy trading platform, commercial market, limited-purpose national securities association, customer protection, merchants, brokers, commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors, registered account executives, sugar, corn, ethanol, price effects requirements, compliance burden, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC, 677 F.2d 1137 (7th Cir. 1982), Chicago Mercantile Exch. v. SEC, 883 F.2d 537 (7th Cir. 1989), Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. SEC 677 F.2d 1137, 1145 (7th Cir. 1982), FTC v. Roberts, 276 F.3d 583 (D.C. Cir. 2001), 276 F.3d at 592, chain of precedent, 276 F.3d at 591, SEC vs. Hopper, corporate disclosures, US vs. Reliant Energy Services, 420 F Supp.2d 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2006), exclusive regulatory authority, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC, instruments, accounts, Ken Roberts Co. v. FTC, No. 01-1772, 537 U.S. 820, 2002 WL 32135703, speculative limits, Energy Department, DOE, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, emissions credit, Agriculture Department, USDA, Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, Trichilo v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 823 F.2d 702, 706 (2d Cir. 1987), SEC v. American Commodity Exch., 546 F.2d 1361, International Trading Ltd. v. Bell, 556 S.W.2d 420 (Ark. 1977), Clayton Brokerage Co. v. Mouer, 531 S.W.2d 805 (Tex. 1975), Minnesota v. Coin Wholesalers, 250 N.W.2d 583 (Minn. 1976), Amaranth, statutory authority, non-petroleum based commodities, agricultural feed-stocks, price artificiality, contract markets, intermediaries, agents, counterparties, contractual privity, contradictory requirements, United States Congress, 2006 WL 778640 (S.D. Tex. March 24 2006),

MFA Letter to IRS Regarding Compliance Issues for Private Investment Funds Filing a Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report05.13.09


MFA submitted a letter as a follow up to its meeting on April 7 with officials from the IRS to […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: FBAR Requirements private investment funds, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Reports, hedge funds, prior submissions, Patton Boggs LLP, Office of Chief Counsel, regulations, covered financial accounts, U.S. tax-exempt investors, master-feeder structures, domestic feeder fund, group filings, Form TD 90-22.1, cost-efficient, Fund Managers, compliance, adverse guidance, Glen Kirkland, IRS Reports Clearance Officer, OMB No. 1545-2038, limited liability companies, signature authority, taxpayer identification number, banks, publicly-traded corporations, tax-exempt organization, SRZ, Partnerships, bonds, notes, stock certificates, equity interest, John G. Gaine, Don Carbaugh, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, FinCEN, United States Department of the Treasury, William Langford, federal tax return, Form TDF 90-22.1, Detroit Computing Center of the Internal Revenue Service, private equity, domestic limited partnerships, domestic limited liability companies, flow through, brokerate accounts, foreign currencies, foreign securities, interpretive guidance, general definitions, derivatives, savings, demand, checking, deposit, mutual fund, illiquid, lock-up periods, tax forms, Form 990, Form 990-PF, Form 5500, Form 1040, schedule B, Question 7a, Form 1065, Question 9, Form 1120, Schedule N, Questioon 6a, AML program rule, pooled interest, control the disposition, Form TD F 90-22, Betty Santangelo, Nancy Rose, Carl E. Kennedy, Don Moorehead, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, legislators, President's Working Group on Financial Markets, PWG, Side-by-Side Structure, board directors, filing exception, FBAR, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, federal register,