MFA Comment Letters

Topic: clearing threshold

MFA Letter to ESAs on EMIR Risk Mitigation Regulatory Technical Standards07.14.14


MFA submitted a comment letter to the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) on their joint consultation paper on “Draft regulatory technical […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: European Banking Authority European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, European Supervisory Authorities, consultation paper, EMIR, European Market Infrastructure Regulation, systemic risk, counterparty credit risk, collateral, OTC derivatives market, market participants, regulatory technical standards, margin, segregation, third country, financial counterparties, non-financial counterparty, clearing threshold, variation margin, initial margin, transparency, G7, harmonization, uncleared derivative, regulatory arbitrage, Basel Committee for Banking Supervision, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United States, United Kingdom, European Commission, duplicative regulation, substituted compliance, equivalence, Cayman Islands, alternative investment funds, AIMA, Alternative Investment Management Association, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, counterparties, mandatory margin requirements, documentation, regulatory requirements, minimum notional threshold, trade repositories, settlement period, netting, trading costs, efficiency, legal opinion, verification requirement, concentration limits, proportionality principle, US Treasuries, securities, liquidity, haircuts, settlement currency, collateral currency, base currency, third party custodian, liquidation, in-scope entity, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, ISDA, dispute resolution procedures, Individual Segregation,

MFA Submits Comments to the Monetary Authority of Singapore on Proposed Regulations on OTC Derivatives03.26.12


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in response to its Consultation Paper on Proposed […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Monetary Authority of Singapore MAS, OTC derivatives, over-the-counter derivatives, Consultation Paper on Proposed Regulation of OTC Derivatives, G20, OTC derivatives market, systemic risk, efficient capital flows, mandary clearing, clearing, bilateral market, risk management, derivatives transactions, trading mandate, liquid and standardized transactions, client access to clearing, clearing arrangements, margin methodologies, straight-through processing, central clearing, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, Gary Gensler, Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary Schapiro, market participants, central counterparty, CCP, average notional value, clearing threshold, buy-side clearing, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Dodd-Frank Act, backloading, Financial Stability Board, FSB, international harmonization of regulations, swaps, European Union, EU, European Commission, ESMA, legal entity identifiers, confidentiality, transaction data, counterparty identification, customized and proprietary investment strategies, intellectual property, International Organization of Securities Commissions, IOSCO, foreign regulator, financial entities, non-financial entities, Singapore, Form PF, margin requirements, netting, trading costs, aggregate counterparty credit risk, settlement risk, commercial banks, dealers, money changers, registered insurers, non-centrally cleared derivatives transactions, margin determinations, liquidation horizons, fragmentation of liquidity, clearing house, counterparty risk, recognized clearing houses, clearing facilities, real-time processing, barriers to entry, non-dealer client representation, risk committees, G20 commitments, regulatory regime, duplicative regulation, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture Nutrition and Forestry, trade repositories, Securities and Futures Commission, Honk Kong Monetary Authority,
  • Page
  • 1