MFA Comment Letters

Topic: buy-side market participants

MFA and AIMA Submit Joint Letter to CFTC on Further Proposed Cross-Border Guidance02.06.13


MFA and AIMA jointly submitted a comment letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on its “Further Proposed Guidance […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, Cross-Border, swaps, duplicative regulation, Alternative Investment Management Association, AIMA, Dodd-Frank Act, prime brokers, hedge fund managers, U.S. person, interpretive guidance, market participants, Corporation, partnership, Limited Liability Company, LLC, Trust, joint-stock company, direct or indirect ownership, commodity pool, pooled accounts, collective investment vehicles, commodity pool operator, CPO, pension, estate, income tax, principal place of business test, investment manager, limited liability partnership, LLP, investment fund, ownership test, derivatives, OTC derivatives, over-the-counter derivatives, OTC derivatives market, international harmonization of regulations, regulatory framework, swap dealer, Major Swap Participant, msp, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, central counterparty, CCP, trade repositories, mandatory clearing requirements, clearing, central clearing, systemic risk, Gary Gensler, Mary Schapiro, OTC derivatives reform, CPPSS-IOSCO, IOSCO, International Organization of Securities Commissions, European Union, EU, Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Hong Kong, Monetary Authority of Singapore, Singapore, MAS, foreign regulators, Dealer, buy-side market participants, registration, adviser registration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, OCC, majority ownership, Look Through, fund of funds, listed entity, Form CPO-PQR, de minimis, commodities, phase-in period, execution, G20, G20 commitments, transparency,

MFA Submits Comment Letter to CFTC on Proposed Dodd-Frank Implementation Rules for Mandatory Swap Clearing, Trade Execution, and Margin Rules11.04.11


The OTC derivatives reforms (Title VII) resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act will cause sweeping transformation of the OTC derivatives markets […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, swaps, swap transaction, swap transaction compliance, clearing, trade execution, margining, margining requirements, Dodd-Frank Act, mandatory clearing, Rulemaking, Gary Gensler, central clearing, market participants, buy-side participants, end-user exemptions, product definition rules, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, security-based swaps, swap dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, collateral, full-scale clearing, uncleared swaps, liquidity, execution, Category 2 Entities, Category 1 Entities, active fund, buy-side market participants, private funds, swap execution facilities, SEF, Designated Contracts Markets, DCMs, real-time reporting, swap data, Regulators, derivatives clearing organization, futures commission merchants, FCM, non-dealer market participants, clearing mandate, G20, OTC derivatives, over-the-counter derivatives, exchanges, electronic platform, central counterparties, CCP, federal register, class of swaps, voluntary clearing, Category 3 Entities, Scott O'Malia, compliance schedules, compliance date, made available for trading, partial tear-ups, novations, third-party subaccount, non-MSP counterparties, interest rate swaps, broad-based index credit default swaps, commodity swaps, systemic risk, real-time clearing, cost-benefit analysis, price distortion, bilateral execution, execution venue, listing, security-based swap SEF, Category 4 Entities, trading documentation, phased implementation, transparency, prudential regulators, variation margin, netting, counterparties,
  • Page
  • 1