MFA Comment Letters

Related Legislation: Dodd-Frank

Comment Letter to ESMA on its Draft Technical Advice to the European Commission for Implementing AIFMD09.13.11


MFA submitted comments to ESMA on its consultation on possible implementing measures of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: AIFMD the directive, Level 2, third party managers, European Commission, consultation paper, AIF, UCITS Directive, MiFID, professional investors, retail investors, marketing, counterparties, prime brokers, net asset value, Article 61, AUM, AUM Calculations, mark-to-market, EU investors, sub-investment managers, Dodd-Frank, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Advisers Act, registration, private funds, G-20, international coordination, Article 3(2), Article 9(3), professional indemnity insurance requirements, Gross Method, exposure, leverage, foreign exchange hedging position, interest rate hedging position, Box 93, Box 2, Box 1, NAV, Advanced Method, Box 13, diligence requirement, OTC transaction, securities lending agreement, repurchase agreement, Box 19, Box 29, risk management, risk limits, operational risk, portfolio management, market risk, portfolio risk, liquidity risk, gates, side pockets, redemption policy, depositaries, depositary, bespoke system, Box 78, collateral directive, Box 79, liability standards, Financial Services Authority, FSA, re-hypothecation provisions, Box 81, Box 86, due diligence, sub-custodian, Box 88, segregation, Box 89, omnibus accounts, liability regime, Box 95, Box 99, Value at Risk, VaR, Commitment Method, European Central Bank, ECB, Committee on European Securities Regulators, CESR Guidelines, credit default swap, CDS, remuneration, EU Passport, transparency, Box 106, passport regime, safe-keeping function, confidentiality, proprietary information, systemic risk, semi-annual reporting, collateral, counterparty exposures, Form PF, reporting period, generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Level 2 inputs, Level 3 inputs, valuation agents, underwriters, unobservable,

Comment Letter to SEC and CFTC on Proposed Rules Defining ‘Swap,’ ‘Security-Based Swap,’ and ‘Security-Based Swap Agreement,’ and Guidance on Mixed Swaps and Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping07.22.11


MFA submitted comments to the SEC and CFTC in response to their request for comments on their proposal on the […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, further definitions of swap, Security-Based Swap, security-based swap agreement, mixed swaps, security-based swap agreement recordkeeping, forward contract exclusion, commodities, 1993 energy exemption, loan participants, OTC derivatives, systemic risk, book-out contracts, market participants, nonfinancial commodity, security, deferred shipment, delivery, physically settled, physical commodity, energy commodities, oil, alternative delivery procedures, loan participations, direct or indirect ownership, beneficial ownership interest, true participation, Federal Securities Laws, netting, loan markets, participation agreements, assignment and assumption agreements, grantor, participant, Loan Syndications and Trading Association, LSTA, loan market association, LMA, lender of record, loan agreement, loan payments, true sale, bankruptcy estate, current debtor-creditor relationship, true participants, loan total return swaps, total return receiver, total return payer, reference loan, synthetic exposure, loan transfer mechanism, primary loan markets, secondary loan markets, exchange trading, central clearing, capital, margin, reporting, recordkeeping, business conduct requirements, eligible contract participants, material non-public information, private market, antifraud liabilities, loan arrangers, alternative transfer structure, syndicated loan market, institutional investors, liquidity, U.S. domiciled counterparties, non-U.S. counterparties,

Supplementary Letter to the SEC in Response to its Proposed Antifraud Rule with Respect to Security-Based Swaps03.29.11


MFA submitted a letter to supplement our December 23, 2010 letter to the SEC in response to its proposed antifraud […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, Fraud, Manipulation, Deception, security-based swaps, anti-fraud rule, security based swaps market, cost-benefit analysis, honest markets, legitimate market activity, US OTC derivatives market, derivatives market, swaps market, legitimate market participation, purchase, sale, definitions, statutory authorization, security based swap anti-fraud rule, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc, The Loan Syndications and Trading Association, maturity date, context, bilateral contracts, novations, unwinds, assignments, execution, termination, assignment, exchange, transfer of rights/obligations, conveyance of rights/obligations, extinguishment of rights/obligations, total return swaps, credit default swaps, transferor, credit events, corporate actions, underlying shares, disruption events, termination events, collateral, systemic risk, interim payments, premium payments, spread payments, material non-public information, ISDA master agreement, clearing agreement, counterparty defaults, bankruptcy proceedings, Bankruptcy Code, automatic stay provisions, price discovery process, fair dealing, competition, capital formation, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, single name credit default swaps, non-index multi-name credit default swaps, equity linked forwards, equity-linked swaps, unallocated swaps, Bank of International Settlements, BIS, price discovery, primary participant, secondary participant, credit exposure, equity exposure, institutional leveraged loans, investment grade bonds, Financial Stability Board, primary debt issuance, investment grade loans, leveraged loans, LBO-related loans, corporate loans, high yield bonds, Loan market Review, Reuters, SEC v. Rotech, FCIC, CDS market, swap market, financial crisis, price efficiency, investor confidence, material dislocation,

Comment Letter to the CFTC in Response to its Request for Comments on Position Limits for Derivatives03.28.11


MFA submitted comments to the CFTC in response to its request for comments on position limits for derivatives. MFA remains […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: CFTC Commodity Futures Trading Commission, position limits, derivatives, futures, option contract, swap contract, futures market, price risk, commercial participants, operating company, financial institution, energy market infrastructure, liquid price discovery, risk-shifting market, market manipulation, federal limits, crowding out provision, spot month, disaggregation relief, deliverable supply, inter-commodity spread transactions, bona fide hedger, price discovery, risk management, commodity market, annual recalculation methodology, U.S. futures exchange, delivery point, individual class rules, legacy position limits, agricultural commodities, disorderly markets, spot-month position limits, referenced contracts, aggregate spot-month position limits, swaptions, DCMs, physically delivered contracts, cash-settled contracts, conditional-spot month limit, cash position, forward position, physical commodity deliverable, aggregate all-months-combined, aggregate single-month, futures class all-months-combined, futures class single-month, swaps class all-months-combined, swaps class single-month, open interest, non-spot position limits, calendar-spread exemption, hedging transaction, cash market transaction, cash market risk, swap dealer hedge exemption, pool participant, future commission merchants, FCMs, independently controlled and managed trader, account aggregation requirements, enumerated agricultural commodities, open interest formula, position visibility, reporting requirements, offsetting positions, excessive speculation, interstate commerce, physical commodity, interest rates, stock indices, squeezes, market liquidity, global commodity, regulatory oversight, risk transfer, energy price volatility, CTFC Inter-Agency Task Force on Commodity Markets, GAO, IOSCO, IMG, UK Treasury, CME, The Economist, supply and demand, U.S. dollar, price volatility, NYMEX crude oil price, speculative investment, crude oil futures, International Organization of Securities Commission, IOSCO Technical Committee, IMF World Economic outlook, HM Treasury Global Commodities, OECD publishing, JP Morgan, long positions, hedge funds, short positions, Chicago onions, Berlin wheat, Credit Agricole, Energy Risk, University of Calgary, PKVerleger LLC, Wall St. Journal, Artificial limits, Barclays Capital, OECD Food, Jacks Study, Commission Energy Complex Report, Global Energy Management Institute, Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, House Committee on Agriculture, Pirrong Testimony, price spikes, agricultural model, metal commodity, seasonal variation, market surveillance, OTC, WTI, independently controlled accounts, independent third party, commodity trading advisors, common parent, CPO, CTA, control standard, commodity pool operator, commodity trading advisor, eligible entity, order routing arrangement, disclosure documents, non-financial entity exemption, active trading program, passive trading program, funds of funds, private equity investments, passive investors, pension plan, independent account controller exemption, asset manager, corporate enterprises, speculative trading ventures, CFTC docket no. 11-05, CFTC docket no. 08-02, pool participant exemption, equity interest, market depth, no-action relief, percentage interest, real-time basis, university endowment, liquidity provisions, application based exemption, approval based exemption, annual renewal based exemption, self-executing disaggregation, reporting obligation, surveillance, audit, enforcement, cross-ownership of traders, statement of reporting trader, benchmark contracts, NYMEX Henery Hub Natural Gas contract, commercial hedgers, inter-commodity spread exemption, arbitrage exemption, directional position, outright positions, submarket, large trader data, seasonality, annual limits, CBOT, NYBOT, KCBOT, pre-existing position exemption, significant price discovery contracts, index fund manager, class limits, rounding, hypothetical portfolios, cleared bilateral contracts, non-cleared bilateral contracts, front month position, deferred month positions, last day swaps, penultimate swaps, options, delta, financial cal spread options, physical cal spread options, physical options, HH natural gas,

Comment Letter in Response to the FDICs Interim Final Rule Implementing Certain Provisions of the Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA),03.28.11


MFA filed a comment letter in response to the FDICs interim final rule implementing certain provisions of the orderly liquidation […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC, Liquidation Authority provisions, orderly liquid authority, OLA, creditor losses, shareholder losses, liquidation process, systemically significant firm, non-statutory considerations, Bankruptcy Code, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, financial market meltdown, covered financial institution, insolvency laws, insolvency proceeding, investor, systemic risk, transparency, estate, creditor participation, creditor involvement, market expertise, Disclosure, claim disallowance, judicial review, distress, volatility, moral hazard, market discipline, receivership, short-term creditors, debt instrument, allocation of capital, short-term financing, longer-term financing, bond holders, short-term lenders, providers of lines of credit, preferred creditors, equality of distribution, critical vendors, doctrine of necessity, Union Bank v. Wolas, chapter 7 liquidation, favored creditors, unsecured creditors, Board of Directors of FDIC, ratable payments, liquidation value, valuation of collateral, underlying collateral, unsecured claim, fair market value, US government securities, valuation rules, true market valuation, unsecured deficiency claim, quotes, market data, third-party market participants, valuation date, publicly traded securities, secured creditor, receivership estate, market fluctuations, swaps, repurchase agreements, securities contracts, bridge financial company, default, contingent claims, unduly delay, liquidation framework,

Comment Letter Responding to FDIC’s Proposed Rules to Implement Certain Provisions of the Orderly Liquidation Authority in Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act.01.18.11


MFA filed a comment letter with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) in response to the FDICs proposed rules […]

  • Page
  • 1