MFA Comment Letters

Related Legislation: 124 Stat. 1376

Comment Letter to FSOC on Proposed Rules and Related Guidance on the Criteria for Designating Systemically Significant Nonbank Financial Institutions12.19.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the Financial Stability Oversight Council regarding proposed rules to designate nonbank financial companies as […]

Comment Letter to the CFTC in Response to its Request for Comments on Position Limits for Derivatives03.28.11


MFA submitted comments to the CFTC in response to its request for comments on position limits for derivatives. MFA remains […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: CFTC Commodity Futures Trading Commission, position limits, derivatives, futures, option contract, swap contract, futures market, price risk, commercial participants, operating company, financial institution, energy market infrastructure, liquid price discovery, risk-shifting market, market manipulation, federal limits, crowding out provision, spot month, disaggregation relief, deliverable supply, inter-commodity spread transactions, bona fide hedger, price discovery, risk management, commodity market, annual recalculation methodology, U.S. futures exchange, delivery point, individual class rules, legacy position limits, agricultural commodities, disorderly markets, spot-month position limits, referenced contracts, aggregate spot-month position limits, swaptions, DCMs, physically delivered contracts, cash-settled contracts, conditional-spot month limit, cash position, forward position, physical commodity deliverable, aggregate all-months-combined, aggregate single-month, futures class all-months-combined, futures class single-month, swaps class all-months-combined, swaps class single-month, open interest, non-spot position limits, calendar-spread exemption, hedging transaction, cash market transaction, cash market risk, swap dealer hedge exemption, pool participant, future commission merchants, FCMs, independently controlled and managed trader, account aggregation requirements, enumerated agricultural commodities, open interest formula, position visibility, reporting requirements, offsetting positions, excessive speculation, interstate commerce, physical commodity, interest rates, stock indices, squeezes, market liquidity, global commodity, regulatory oversight, risk transfer, energy price volatility, CTFC Inter-Agency Task Force on Commodity Markets, GAO, IOSCO, IMG, UK Treasury, CME, The Economist, supply and demand, U.S. dollar, price volatility, NYMEX crude oil price, speculative investment, crude oil futures, International Organization of Securities Commission, IOSCO Technical Committee, IMF World Economic outlook, HM Treasury Global Commodities, OECD publishing, JP Morgan, long positions, hedge funds, short positions, Chicago onions, Berlin wheat, Credit Agricole, Energy Risk, University of Calgary, PKVerleger LLC, Wall St. Journal, Artificial limits, Barclays Capital, OECD Food, Jacks Study, Commission Energy Complex Report, Global Energy Management Institute, Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, House Committee on Agriculture, Pirrong Testimony, price spikes, agricultural model, metal commodity, seasonal variation, market surveillance, OTC, WTI, independently controlled accounts, independent third party, commodity trading advisors, common parent, CPO, CTA, control standard, commodity pool operator, commodity trading advisor, eligible entity, order routing arrangement, disclosure documents, non-financial entity exemption, active trading program, passive trading program, funds of funds, private equity investments, passive investors, pension plan, independent account controller exemption, asset manager, corporate enterprises, speculative trading ventures, CFTC docket no. 11-05, CFTC docket no. 08-02, pool participant exemption, equity interest, market depth, no-action relief, percentage interest, real-time basis, university endowment, liquidity provisions, application based exemption, approval based exemption, annual renewal based exemption, self-executing disaggregation, reporting obligation, surveillance, audit, enforcement, cross-ownership of traders, statement of reporting trader, benchmark contracts, NYMEX Henery Hub Natural Gas contract, commercial hedgers, inter-commodity spread exemption, arbitrage exemption, directional position, outright positions, submarket, large trader data, seasonality, annual limits, CBOT, NYBOT, KCBOT, pre-existing position exemption, significant price discovery contracts, index fund manager, class limits, rounding, hypothetical portfolios, cleared bilateral contracts, non-cleared bilateral contracts, front month position, deferred month positions, last day swaps, penultimate swaps, options, delta, financial cal spread options, physical cal spread options, physical options, HH natural gas,

Comment Letter to the CFTC on its Proposed Core Principles and Other Requirements for Swap Execution Facilities03.08.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the CFTC on its proposed Core Principles and Other Requirements for Swap Execution Facilities. […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, swap execution facilities, SEFs, SEF trading platforms, regulatory efficiencies, market efficiencies, market-based competition, transparency, real-time public reporting of swap transaction data, available for trading, competition, grandfather relief, request for quote, RFQ, order book, cleared swaps, block trades, timing delay, required transactions, Designated Contract Market, DCM, Mandatory Execution Requirement, annual review, market liquidity, minimum block threshold, large notional transaction size threshold, reporting requirements, recordkeeping requirements, daily trading records requirements, major swap participants, CEA, RFQ system, Over-the-Counter, OTC, electronic platform, one-to-one voice services, mandatory objective criteria, mandatory transparent criteria, OTC market, connectivity, grace period, liquidity, resting bids, swap data repositories, liquidity characteristics, bilateral trading environment, trading venues, dealer-to-customer platforms, exchanges, swap execution, bilateral trading, voice-based trading, flexibility, execution protocol, order book systems, multiple-to-multiple trading venues, limit order, central limit order variants, non-continuous liquidity, credit default swaps, responsive quote, interstate commerce, mandatory minimum required recipients, quote requesters, institutional investors, voice-based system, security-based swap execution facility, SB SEF, permitted transactions, block trade thresholds, block size, data analysis, minimum block sizes, joint the trade, auction-based methods, matching, fixing, open outcry trading pits, quote-requesting participant, widened bid/offer spreads, exchanges for physical, exchanges for swaps, off-market transactions, linked transactions, packaged transactions, single joint transactions, crossing, matching traders, futures position, physical position, cash position, debt instrument, physical contract, discreet contract, Manipulation, price distortion, congestion, sporadic liquidity, emergency procedure, public information, complete audit trail, conflicts of interest, chief compliance officer, ISDA, SIFMA, Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets, CBOE futures exchange, RFQ response period, Rulebook,

Comment Letter to the CFTC on Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations, Designated Contract Markets, and Swap Execution Facilities; Additional Requirements Regarding the Mitigation of Conflicts of Interest03.07.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the CFTC on Governance Requirements for Derivatives Clearing Organizations, Designated Contract Markets, and Swap […]

Comment Letter to the CFTC on Confirmation, Portfolio Reconciliation, and Portfolio Compression Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants02.28.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the CFTC on its proposal on Confirmation, Portfolio Reconciliation, and Portfolio Compression Requirements for […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CFTC, confirmation, portfolio reconciliation, portfolio compression requirements, swap dealers, major swap participants, SDs, MSPs, operational abilities, market participants, post-trade exercises, mandated timeframes, Counterparty, trade execution, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, valuation data, bilateral portfolio compression exercise, multilateral portfolio compression exercises, swap markets, pre-trade draft acknowledgement requirement, customized swaps, heavily negotiated swaps, time-sensitive swaps, hedging risk, limiting parties, volatility, bid spreads, offer spreads, over-the-counter derivatives, legal risks, rights, trade acknowledgment, consistent timing, confirmation periods, financial entities, pension plans, private funds, insurance companies, banks, swap portfolio trade confirmation, electronic processing, calendar day, financial entity, trade capture system, electronic matching platforms, electronic matching process, complex swap, life cycle events, timing requirements, novation, modification, partial termination, dividend payment, merger, market disruption, compliance period, clearance, exchange execution, clearing satisfying requirements, Designated Contract Market, DCM, Swap Execution Facility, SEF, derivatives clearing organization, DCO, confirmation requirement, collateral management, counterparty risk, market risk, position level discrepancies, margin disputes, position level portfolio reconciliation, best practices, bilateral portfolio reconciliation exercise, multilateral portfolio reconciliation exercise, Valuation Disputes, valuation discrepancy, nominal value, dollar threshold, broader markets, collateral steering committee of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc., ISDA, market-driven solution, portfolio compression rule, operational risk, risk mitigation benefits, multilateral compression, swaps portfolio, liquidity,

Comment Letter to the SEC and CFTC on Definitions of “Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer (together, SDs), Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant (together MSPs) and Eligible Contract Participant (ECP)02.22.11


MFA submitted a comment letter to the SEC and CFTC on their joint proposed rule to further define swap dealer, […]

Click to expand relevant topics

Topics: Commodity Futures Trading Commission Securities Exchange Commission, CFTC, SEC, Swaps dealer, SD, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant, Major Security-Based Swap Participant, msp, security-based swaps, market activity, market growth, systemic risk, United States financial markets, potential future exposure test, systemically important, MSP thresholds, Dealer, end-users, default risk, risk-mitigating tools, hedge fund managers, potential future exposure calculation, over-collateralization, current uncollateralized outward exposure test, independent amount of collateral, initial margin, mark-to-market exposure, ISDA master agreements, daily variation margin calls, valuation of collateral, future exposure discount, centrally cleared positions, central clearing, clearing member defaults, clearinghouse, variation margin, daily volatility, risk mutualization, discount factor, independent variable, tools of credit protection, reproducible test, credit default swaps, CDS, index CDS, unpaid premiums, portfolio risk, fixed downside risk, interest rate swap, LIBOR, swap rate, market-standard discount rate, CDS protection, index reference entity, volatility, jump-to-default risk, single-name CDS, risk factor multiplier, high yield credit swaps, investment-grade credit swaps, credit spreads, credit ratings, investment grade, non-investment grade, margin methodologies, bank capital standards, Chicago mercantile exchange, CME, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., FINRA, multiplier, spread bank designation, swap underlier, swaptions, options on a swap, physically settled swaptions, cash settled swaptions, option expiration date, Form PF, delta weighting, Financial Stability Oversight Council, large private fund, smaller private fund, Form PQR, MSP definitions, Proposed Form PF section 1b, question 11, question 27, proposed form PF section 2(a), question 38, proposed form PF section 3, question 47, proposed form PF section 4, question 68, proposed Form PQR, schedule B, question 5, substantial counterparty exposure, MSP test, substantial position, undiversified market participant, counterparty exposure, systemically important financial institution, commercial hedging, index derivatives, commercial loans, mitigating commercial risk, threshold levels, dealers, uncollateralized exposure, potential systemic risk impact, inflation, upward adjustment, U.S. banking system, highly leveraged, liabilities to equity, asset mix, liquidity, liquidity rights, capital markets, secured debt, unsecured debt, short-term leverage, overnight borrowing, short-term financing, highly liquid assets, US Treasuries, longer-term leverage, term borrowings, risk factor multipliers, high-grade corporate securities, FSOC, hedge funds, eligible contract participant, ECP, non-ECP, financial counterparty, traditional commodity pool, Retail Forex Pool, SD obligations, retail cash, currency based institutions, limited purpose designations, minimum duration of status, quarters, deregistration period, reevaluation period, abnormal price movement, applicable MSP thresholds, master-feeder fund, feeder fund, trading entity, MSP determination, Senator Hagan, Senator Lincoln, creditworthiness, know your counterparty requirements, daily mark requirements, trade verification, acknowledgment requirements, fund domicile, manager domicile, reference entity domicile, market location, underlying instrument, counterparty domicile, US entities, non-US entities, non-US domiciled fund, non-US securities, non-U.S. market, offshore fund, non-U.S. regulators.,