<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Managed Funds Association -- MFA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.managedfunds.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.managedfunds.org</link>
	<description>global hedge fund, regulation, policy, legislation, managed futures, Managed Funds Association - MFA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Study Provides Analysis of Proposed European Financial Transaction Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-study-provides-analysis-of-proposed-european-financial-transaction-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-study-provides-analysis-of-proposed-european-financial-transaction-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Transaction Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study commissioned by the Association for Financial Markets in Europe by Oxera provides analysis of the proposed European [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent study commissioned by the Association for Financial Markets in Europe by Oxera provides <a href="http://www.managedfunds.org/industry-resources/industry-research/analysis-of-european-commission-staff-working-document-on-the-proposed-financial-transaction-tax/">analysis of the proposed European financial transaction tax (FTT)</a>.  This paper shows some of the costs and effects of the proposed FTT plan, including the increase in costs to investors and companies raising capital, reducing liquidity, an increase in sovereign borrowing costs, and a reduction in returns of pension funds.</p>
<p>Oxera notes a number of findings in this analysis, noting in particular:</p>
<ul>
<li>The effect of taxing intermediate transactions would be either to multiply the costs to end-users (such as end-investors and companies raising capital) and/or to reduce market making and therefore reduce liquidity—neither of which is in the interests of endusers.</li>
<li>The extent by which taxing secondary market transactions in government debt will increase sovereign borrowing costs and reduce market liquidity could be greater than the Commission assumes—these impacts are not consistent with the objective of reducing the burden of sovereign debt costs.</li>
<li>The effect of taxing repos would be to make many valuable transactions uneconomic, and to introduce inefficiency into the repo market itself, and inefficiencies into those activities that use repos as a mechanism to reduce their costs and/or risks—these costs would ultimately fall on end-users.</li>
<li>Taxing derivatives will hit some hedging activities much harder than others, deterring some forms of prudent risk management—this means that the Commission’s assumption that the loss of derivatives trading will have no wider economic impact is less tenable.</li>
<li>The effect of taxing transactions undertaken by pension funds, together with the effect of taxing intermediate transactions, would be to reduce the returns of pension products—this is not in the interests of people saving for their retirement.</li>
</ul>
<p>Specifically regarding pensions, Oxera found that the impact of the FTT accumulates significantly over time for an actively managed pension fund, ultimately reducing the final pension by almost 8%.  This impact, Oxera noted, would “vary across different pension products, and potentially encourage funds to shift into untaxed investments, which may or may not be in the interests of consumers.”</p>
<p>Learn more about this report by <a href="http://www.managedfunds.org/industry-resources/industry-research/analysis-of-european-commission-staff-working-document-on-the-proposed-financial-transaction-tax/">downloading and reading it online here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-study-provides-analysis-of-proposed-european-financial-transaction-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MFA and Other Trade Associations Submit Letter to CFTC Staff Requesting Extension of 1.73 Bunched Order Agreement Compliance Date</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-and-other-trade-associations-submit-letter-to-cftc-staff-requesting-extension-of-1-73-bunched-order-agreement-compliance-date/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-and-other-trade-associations-submit-letter-to-cftc-staff-requesting-extension-of-1-73-bunched-order-agreement-compliance-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bunched orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Futures Trading Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futures commission merchant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Company Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIFMA AMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MFA, the Futures Industry Association, the Investment Company Institute, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s Asset Management Group [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MFA, the Futures Industry Association, the Investment Company Institute, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s Asset Management Group <a href="https://www.managedfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/173-Request-for-Extension-052113-Revised2.pdf">submitted a joint letter</a> to the Division of Clearing and Risk of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) requesting a 90-day extension of Rule 1.73(a)(2)(v)(B).  Rule 1.73(a)(2)(v)(B) requires futures commission merchants (FCMs) and account managers to enter into an agreement for bunched orders that requires the account manager to screen the bunched order for compliance with applicable risk limits.  In the letter, MFA and the other trade associations expressed that, although the industry is actively working on complying with the obligations of the rule, more time is necessary to disseminate the industry standard agreement and promote industry-wide education regarding the agreement and the requirements of the rule.  Therefore, MFA and the other trade association requested that CFTC Staff extend the compliance date for the rule from June 1, 2013 to September 1, 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-and-other-trade-associations-submit-letter-to-cftc-staff-requesting-extension-of-1-73-bunched-order-agreement-compliance-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Reports Focus on Clearing Deadline Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-reports-focus-on-clearing-deadline-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-reports-focus-on-clearing-deadline-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category II firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearing members]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TABB Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodbine Associates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent research reports from the TABB Group and Woodbine Associates explore the issues facing firms in the alternative investment industry [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent research reports from the TABB Group and Woodbine Associates explore the issues facing firms in the alternative investment industry as they approach the June 10 clearing deadline for Category II firms.  Questions regarding readiness and testing loom large.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.managedfunds.org/industry-resources/industry-research/category-ii-clearing-expediting-onboarding/">TABB Group</a> notes that 500 buy-side firms will fall under the Category II mandate and that 75% of those firms, or 375 institutions, will fail to meet the deadline.  Noting that many risks in the lead-up to the deadline are avoidable, the report states that customer onboarding and testing are the most time-critical elements involved in new clearing arrangements.</p>
<p>TABB Group also identifies a number of questions emerging as the deadline approaches:</p>
<ul>
<li>Will there be a legal bottleneck as players rush to comply with regulation at the last minute?</li>
<li>Will some market participants be temporarily locked out of the swaps market come June 10?</li>
<li>Will investors have to find alternative ways to meet their investment objectives?</li>
<li>How will buy side firms handle portfolio risk in the event of a major market disruption?</li>
</ul>
<p>Furthermore, a separate <a href="http://www.managedfunds.org/industry-resources/industry-research/the-fast-track-to-central-clearing-and-optimal-margin-management/">report from Woodbine Associates</a> notes that, “There is no time to waste for Category Two firms that expect to trade swaps after June 10….Category Two firms must rapidly select, register with, and put in place documentation with FCM, CCP and technology partners.”  The report also notes that systems integration must work flawlessly for these firms with ongoing transactions, and any issues or shortcomings must be identified and resolved before clearing large risk positions.  As Woodbine Associates observed, “The capabilities put in place today will dictate how well organizations are able to adapt to change and exploit opportunities in the future.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-reports-focus-on-clearing-deadline-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MFA and AIMA Submit Letter to BaFin on the Interpretation of the German HFT Law</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-and-aima-submit-letter-to-bafin-on-the-interpretation-of-the-german-hft-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-and-aima-submit-letter-to-bafin-on-the-interpretation-of-the-german-hft-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithmic trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BaFIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Frequency Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Frequency Trading Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA Comment Letter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, the Managed Funds Association (MFA) and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) submitted a letter to BaFin, the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today, the Managed Funds Association (MFA) and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) <a href="https://www.managedfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/HFT-BAFIN-MFA-AIMA-Submission-on-German-HFT-Law-2013-Response-to-Consultation.pdf">submitted a letter to BaFin, the German regulator</a>, on the interpretation of the German High Frequency Trading Act.  In the letter, MFA and AIMA request that BaFin issue guidance that an investment manager trading on behalf of its funds would not be interpreted to be “dealing on own account” and subject to the definition of high frequency trading and the associated licensing regime.  MFA and AIMA also make recommendations on the interpretation of certain terms used in the HFT Act, including infrastructure intended to minimize latency times, high intraday message rate, algorithmic trading, and flagging of algorithmic orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-and-aima-submit-letter-to-bafin-on-the-interpretation-of-the-german-hft-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Says Institutional Investments in Hedge Funds Will Climb 56% by 2017</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-report-says-institutional-investments-in-hedge-funds-will-climb-56-by-2017/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-report-says-institutional-investments-in-hedge-funds-will-climb-56-by-2017/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets under management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions & Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preqin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report from Citi Prime Finance says that global institutional investments in hedge funds will increase 56%, to $2.3 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new report from Citi Prime Finance says that global institutional investments in hedge funds will increase 56%, to $2.3 trillion, by the end of 2017.  The report also noted that institutional investors’ assets will represent 71% of all global hedge fund assets at that time.  According to Preqin, institutional assets account for 65% of all current capital invested in hedge funds.</p>
<p>Citi’s report, “The Rise of Liquid Alternatives &amp; the Changing Dynamics of Alternative Product Manufacturing and Distribution,” predicts that assets managed in U.S. liquid alternative funds – which including hedge fund strategies and exchange traded funds – will jump 198% to $908 billion by the end of 2017.  <i>Pensions &amp; Investments</i> has also reported that the percentage of global defined benefit plan assets that hedge funds represent will increase 5.3% by the end of 2017, compared to 4.2% at the end of last year.</p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://citi.com/transactionservices/home/demo/tutorials8/Hedge_Fund_May2013/index.html#/1/zoomed">full Citi Prime Finance report online here</a>.  Read more about the report from <i><a href="http://www.pionline.com/article/20130515/DAILYREG/130519932/citi-institutional-hedge-fund-investments-will-climb-to-23-trillion-by-2017">Pensions &amp; Investments </a></i><a href="http://www.pionline.com/article/20130515/DAILYREG/130519932/citi-institutional-hedge-fund-investments-will-climb-to-23-trillion-by-2017">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/new-report-says-institutional-investments-in-hedge-funds-will-climb-56-by-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MFA Publishes May Policy Brief Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-publishes-may-policy-brief-newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-publishes-may-policy-brief-newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy Brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIFMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-border guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decimalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[educational content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Conduct Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund fundamentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investor's Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Jo White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Barnier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard H. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tick size pilot program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Managed Funds Association published the latest edition of its monthly newsletter, the Policy Brief.  In the May issue, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the Managed Funds Association published the <a href="https://www.managedfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/MFA_May2013_PolicyBrief.pdf">latest edition of its monthly newsletter, the Policy Brief</a>.  In the May issue, MFA covers a wide range of stories from the last month, including news updates and the advocacy and educational outreach of the Association.  The stories highlighted include:</p>
<ul>
<li>The international push lead by European Commissioner for Internal Market and Services Michel Barnier and others to limit the cross-border reach of Dodd-Frank swaps rules.</li>
<li>MFA’s recent comment letter to the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority responding to its second consultation paper on implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD).</li>
<li>MFA President and CEO Richard H. Baker’s op-ed published last month by <i>Institutional Investor’s Alpha</i>, addressing Mary Jo White’s recent confirmation as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and outlining a short list of topics that the global hedge fund community hopes she will address as she assumes leadership of the agency.</li>
<li>A recently submitted comment letter by MFA to the SEC on decimalization and a tick size pilot program.</li>
<li>The release of two new educational infographics on Hedge Fund Fundamentals in April that outline how hedge funds are regulated both in the United States and the European Union.</li>
</ul>
<p>Learn more about these stories by <a href="https://www.managedfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/MFA_May2013_PolicyBrief.pdf">downloading and reading this month’s Policy Brief</a>.  You can also take a look through the <a href="http://www.managedfunds.org/news-media/policy-brief/">archives of the Policy Brief</a> to read past issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-publishes-may-policy-brief-newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Jose Pension Allocates $90 Million to Hedge Funds</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/san-jose-pension-allocates-90-million-to-hedge-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/san-jose-pension-allocates-90-million-to-hedge-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolute return strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund allocations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio diversification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose Federated City Employees' Retirement System]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The San Jose Federated City Employees’ Retirement System funded four absolute return mandates last month.  The investments, spread between four [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The San Jose Federated City Employees’ Retirement System funded four absolute return mandates last month.  The investments, spread between four firms, totaled $90 million.</p>
<p><i><a href="http://bloombergbriefs.com/hedge-funds">Bloomberg Brief</a> </i>reported that the allocations were funded on April 1, according to <a href="http://www.sjretirement.com/uploads/Fed/2_8itemFedMay13.pdf">an informational report</a> issued by the pension fund.  The mandates all belong to the absolute return category for the fund.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sjretirement.com/Uploads/Fed/Federated%20IPS%20-%20Approved%20by%20board%2003.21.2013.pdf">According to the city</a>, the pension system has a target allocation for hedge funds of 25% of total assets.  The hedge fund portfolio is structured to be diversified and include multiple managers and strategies, have low correlation to traditional market indices, to lower overall portfolio risk, and to reduce downside risk in bear markets.</p>
<p>Learn more about this story and more online from <i><a href="http://bloombergbriefs.com/hedge-funds">Bloomberg Brief</a></i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/san-jose-pension-allocates-90-million-to-hedge-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MFA Coalition Submits Joint Letter to SEC and CFTC on CDS Customer Portfolio Margining</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-coalition-submits-joint-letter-to-sec-and-cftc-on-cds-customer-portfolio-margining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-coalition-submits-joint-letter-to-sec-and-cftc-on-cds-customer-portfolio-margining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Council of Life Insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker-dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Futures Trading Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterparty risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Default Swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futures commission merchant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Gensler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE Clear Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Jo White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio margining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-name CDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 10, MFA, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) (collectively, the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 10, MFA, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), and the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) (collectively, the “Associations”) <a href="https://www.managedfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CDS-Customer-Portfolio-Margining-Final-MFA-Coalition-Letter.pdf">submitted a joint letter</a> to SEC Chairman White and CFTC Chairman Gensler with a request for action by the two commissions to improve coordination and to facilitate portfolio margining for customers in the cleared credit default swaps (CDS) market.  This letter follows up on recent meetings with representatives at the CFTC and the SEC.  In the letter, the Associations further expressed members’ concerns with the SEC Staff’s imposition of needlessly high initial margin requirements on customers who want to participate in ICE Clear Credit’s (ICC) cleared CDS portfolio margining program for CDS indices and single-name CDS.  SEC Staff is imposing a temporary level for customers at 1.5 or 2 times the level imposed on dealers using the same CDS portfolio margining program.  The Associations believe this disparity has undermined policy goals to encourage clearing to reduce systemic risk, to protect investors, to reduce counterparty exposure and interconnectedness of both customers and dealers, and to establish an integrated and coordinated regulatory framework by the two commissions.  The Associations requested the SEC to issue final approval of the margin methodologies of the seven broker-dealer/futures commission merchants that have applied for evaluation by SEC Staff and FINRA in a coordinated manner, at a level that matches the approved level for dealers, and as soon as possible in advance of the CFTC’s June 10 mandatory clearing deadline for Category 2 entities.  In the interim, the Associations requested the SEC to modify the temporary customer margin levels to the ICC baseline margin level to match the level approved for dealers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-coalition-submits-joint-letter-to-sec-and-cftc-on-cds-customer-portfolio-margining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MFA Comment Letter to Financial Conduct Authority on AIFMD Implementation</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-comment-letter-to-financial-conduct-authority-on-aifmd-implementation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-comment-letter-to-financial-conduct-authority-on-aifmd-implementation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIFMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Conduct Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HM Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA Comment Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 10, MFA submitted a comment letter to the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (formerly the Financial Services Authority) in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 10, MFA <a href="https://www.managedfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/MFA-response-to-FCA-consultation-on-AIFMD.pdf" target="_blank">submitted a comment letter</a> to the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (formerly the Financial Services Authority) in response to the FCA’s second consultation paper on implementation of the AIFMD.  In the letter, MFA encouraged the FCA to: (1) amend the proposed FCA regulations in a manner consistent with the proposed regulations of Her Majesty’s Treasury and provide a one-year transition period for all fund managers covered by the AIFMD, and not just for UK fund managers as the FCA previously proposed; (2) also consistent with the position taken by HM Treasury, permit UK fund managers to use one or more depositaries when marketing non-EU funds; (3) adopt, as proposed, a qualitative approach with respect to determining when a delegation arrangement would lead to a so-called “letter box” entity; (4) adopt a residence test, rather than the proposed domicile test, for determining when a manager is marketing to EU investors, in order to promote greater consistency and certainty in applying the AIFMD rules and to avoid potential conflicts of law that could result from applying a test based on domicile; and (5) amend the FCA’s discussion on passive marketing to avoid the use of narrow examples that create uncertainty about the scope of passive marketing activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-comment-letter-to-financial-conduct-authority-on-aifmd-implementation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MFA Associate General Counsel Featured on Panel at SALT Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-associate-general-counsel-featured-on-panel-at-salt-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-associate-general-counsel-featured-on-panel-at-salt-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MFA Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BakerHostetler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Prosek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOBS Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Newell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prosek Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SALT Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SkyBridge Alternatives Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.managedfunds.org/?p=18778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew Newell, Associate General Counsel at the Managed Funds Association, spoke yesterday on a panel at the SkyBridge Alternatives Conference [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew Newell, Associate General Counsel at the Managed Funds Association, spoke yesterday on a panel at the SkyBridge Alternatives Conference in Las Vegas.  The <a href="http://www.saltconference.com/agenda.html">panel discussion focused on the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act</a>.</p>
<p>The panel also focused on different ways that the JOBS Act will impact the hedge fund industry.  Once fully implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the JOBS Act will remove the ban on general solicitation of private funds.</p>
<p>During the presentation, panelists discussed the timing of the implementation of the JOBS Act (which was due to be completed last summer), the effect on dual registrants, and what firms are currently doing to prepare.  Newell presented MFA’s perspective, hoping for swift resolution to the JOBS Act rules and noting their importance to MFA’s members and the industry as a whole.</p>
<p>Joining Newell on the panel was Victor Park, Principal &amp; Founder, Alternative Assets; Marc D. Powers, Partner, BakerHostetler; and Jennifer Prosek, Managing Partner, Prosek Partners.</p>
<p>Learn more about the <a href="http://www.saltconference.com/index.html">SALT Conference online here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.managedfunds.org/2013/05/mfa-associate-general-counsel-featured-on-panel-at-salt-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
